Nirvana and the Rock 'n' Roll of Fame

13»

Comments

  • SomethingCreative
    SomethingCreative Kazoo, MI Posts: 3,412
    Honestly, Eddie Vedder would be the only person for that job. I honestly think he's the only person Dave and Krist would ever consider doing it with. I seriously doubt Eddie would do it though, so no reunion.

    Why? He's about the last person I'd expect to ever be considered to fill in.

    Because he and Kurt's bands conquered the world as rivals and over time he earned respect from the rest of the band. I feel that out of Ed, you'd get the most honest, heartfelt, respectful tribute.
    "Well, I think this band is incapable of sucking."
    -my dad after hearing Not for You for the first time on SNL .
  • soulsinging
    soulsinging Posts: 13,202
    Honestly, Eddie Vedder would be the only person for that job. I honestly think he's the only person Dave and Krist would ever consider doing it with. I seriously doubt Eddie would do it though, so no reunion.

    Why? He's about the last person I'd expect to ever be considered to fill in.

    Because he and Kurt's bands conquered the world as rivals and over time he earned respect from the rest of the band. I feel that out of Ed, you'd get the most honest, heartfelt, respectful tribute.

    I'm sure Ed would be all of those things, but I imagine their first consideration would be getting someone that can do the songs justice. That's why Ed filled in for Jim Morrison... the voice sounded right and he was as close to Jim as anyone you could have wanted. But Ed sounds nothing like Kurt and it would kinda take the focus off Nirvana and make it more about the other people on the stage I think. I imagine they'd prefer someone that can sing Nirvana songs in the same spirit Kurt did, and that's not really suited to Ed's style. Also, someone that won't at all steal Nirvana's thunder, since the night is about them.
  • Because he and Kurt's bands conquered the world as rivals and over time he earned respect from the rest of the band. I feel that out of Ed, you'd get the most honest, heartfelt, respectful tribute.

    Something similar happened when Lou Reed inducted Frank Zappa. They had a love/hate relationship and Lou felt really guilty when Frank died so he volunteered to induct him. It was sort of strange and uncomfortable.
  • soulsinging
    soulsinging Posts: 13,202
    Because he and Kurt's bands conquered the world as rivals and over time he earned respect from the rest of the band. I feel that out of Ed, you'd get the most honest, heartfelt, respectful tribute.

    Something similar happened when Lou Reed inducted Frank Zappa. They had a love/hate relationship and Lou felt really guilty when Frank died so he volunteered to induct him. It was sort of strange and uncomfortable.

    That's what I'm thinking... you don't want the personalities involved and the drama and backstory to eclipse the inductee's music. It should be about what Nirvana accomplished, not laying the rivalry to rest or about grunge as a whole.
  • they haven't reunited as "Nirvana" with any other singer/guitarist since Kurt's death. I really have respect for them because of that, because there must be so much pressure on them to cash in on the name.
    Really?! Dave has FF and TCV. Krist is doing politics, writing a weekly column AND guesting on Flipper records. Where is this pressure you speak of??

    You cannot replace someone like Kurt. What fantasy land are you people living in where you think anybody can be replaced? There will be no Elliott Smith reunion tours going around anytime soon because Elliott Smith is DEAD. There will be no Nirvana reunion shows EVER because Kurt is DEAD.

    AIC chose to get a new singer for whatever reason. They were more of "band's band" anyway unlike Nirvana where Kurt did 99% of the writing, so I can see how they might have entertained the idea of continuing on. I wholly disagree with replacing Layne but so be it. I'd even go so far as to say they shouldn't use the name AIC anymore but I am a hard-liner. Maybe "World's Greatest Alice In Chains Cover Band" but not Alice In Chains. Shit, Led Zeppelin called it quits after their drummer died. That's respectable.

    I won't even get into Lynyrd fucking Skynyrd. I think I'm next in line as a replacement guitarist if another one of them dies...

    p.s. this is all of course my opinion and should be viewed as such. thanks for reading! :mrgreen:
  • facepollution
    facepollution Posts: 6,834
    goldrush wrote:
    Courtney said in an interview years ago that she offered Mark Lanegan one of Kurt's unrecorded songs and he said he didn't want to record it. It would seem unlikely that he'd sing with them as he knows it would have an effect on Kurt's legacy (he knows there would be too many haters, whether we like it or not!)

    I dunno, I don't think I've ever read a single bad word written about Mark Lanegan, he's a very respected artist. He sang with AIC, so I don't see why he wouldn't guest on a song or two with Nirvana, if he were asked.
  • thunderDAN
    thunderDAN Posts: 2,094
    I could see them getting Mike Arm or Frank Black to come and sing for Kurt.
  • soulsinging
    soulsinging Posts: 13,202
    they haven't reunited as "Nirvana" with any other singer/guitarist since Kurt's death. I really have respect for them because of that, because there must be so much pressure on them to cash in on the name.
    Really?! Dave has FF and TCV. Krist is doing politics, writing a weekly column AND guesting on Flipper records. Where is this pressure you speak of??

    You cannot replace someone like Kurt. What fantasy land are you people living in where you think anybody can be replaced? There will be no Elliott Smith reunion tours going around anytime soon because Elliott Smith is DEAD. There will be no Nirvana reunion shows EVER because Kurt is DEAD.

    AIC chose to get a new singer for whatever reason. They were more of "band's band" anyway unlike Nirvana where Kurt did 99% of the writing, so I can see how they might have entertained the idea of continuing on. I wholly disagree with replacing Layne but so be it. I'd even go so far as to say they shouldn't use the name AIC anymore but I am a hard-liner. Maybe "World's Greatest Alice In Chains Cover Band" but not Alice In Chains. Shit, Led Zeppelin called it quits after their drummer died. That's respectable.

    And then reuinited to make gagillions playing that gig in London not long ago. Don't forget the Who touring for years after Moon died. AC/DC. Black Sabbath. Van Halen. Many bands manage to move forward together without original members.
  • tybird
    tybird Posts: 17,388
    tcaporale wrote:
    goldrush wrote:
    ... I preferred Hole's version of You Know You're Right to Nirvana's.......

    As much as I think Courtney is a complete tool, I have to agree with this comment. I was so disappointed with the Nirvana version after hearing Hole's take on it
    Nirvana's version is so much better it isn't funny.
    Agreed. :twisted:
    All the world will be your enemy, Prince with a thousand enemies, and whenever they catch you, they will kill you. But first they must catch you, digger, listener, runner, prince with the swift warning. Be cunning and full of tricks and your people shall never be destroyed.
  • Them-Bones
    Them-Bones Posts: 518
    The only man who can fill in for Kurt, is Kool Keith

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6oUlDpXahE
    "If my thoughts, dreams, could be seen, they'd probably put my head, in a guillotine, but it's alright ma, it's life and life only."
  • Thoughts_Arrive
    Thoughts_Arrive Melbourne, Australia Posts: 15,165
    Them-Bones wrote:
    The only man who can fill in for Kurt, is Kool Keith

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6oUlDpXahE

    I strongly disagree, I find that this man is the only one!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnuHJZMdako
    Adelaide 17/11/2009, Melbourne 20/11/2009, Sydney 22/11/2009, Melbourne (Big Day Out Festival) 24/01/2014