9/11: BBC reports WTC7 collapse 25 minutes before it happened

1235

Comments

  • Posts: 1,143
    Very similar to how Australian news had reported Kennedy's shooting before it actually happened.
    11-2-2000 Portland. 12-8-2002 Seattle. 4-18-2003 Nashville. 5-30-2003 Vancouver. 10-25-2003 Bridge School. 9-2-2005 Vancouver.
    7-6-2006 Las Vegas. 7-20-2006 Portland. 7-22-2006 Gorge. 9-21-2009 Seattle. 9-22-2009 Seattle. 9-26-2009 Ridgefield. 9-25-2011 Vancouver.
    11-29-2013 Portland. 10-16-2014 Detroit. 8-8-2018 Seattle. 8-10-2018 Seattle. 8-13-2018 Missoula.  5-10-2024 Portland.  5-30-2024 Seattle.
  • Posts: 10,118
    Milestone wrote:
    Very similar to how Australian news had reported Kennedy's shooting before it actually happened.


    wow is that true? that is not at all similar btw.

    an engineer can look at wtc7 and suspect it might collapse. and then someone can confuse or exaggerate that a collapse is near or happened.

    someone taking a wild guess that the president would be shot is a whole other ballpark.
  • Posts: 5,515
    jlew24asu wrote:
    wow is that true? that is not at all similar btw.

    an engineer can look at wtc7 and suspect it might collapse. and then someone can confuse or exaggerate that a collapse is near or happened.

    someone taking a wild guess that the president would be shot is a whole other ballpark.

    Well, a 47-story building falling down...is a pretty big thing. The shots fired in Dallas on November 22, on the motorcade, with all the speculation the President had been shot...the media kept their mouths shut until the official word came out.
    The towers had fallen. The big ones. To pretend that a building as large as WT7 falling at that point in the day was somehow less than important than anything else that had happened that day is a bit of a stretch.
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • Posts: 5,515
    gue_barium wrote:
    Well, a 47-story building falling down...is a pretty big thing. The shots fired in Dallas on November 22, on the motorcade, with all the speculation the President had been shot...the media kept their mouths shut until the official word came out.
    The towers had fallen. The big ones. To pretend that a building as large as WT7 falling at that point in the day was somehow less than important than anything else that had happened that day is a bit of a stretch.

    Yet, that's how's its been played, treated.

    That's why I think it was being played, even on that day.
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • Posts: 21,037
    jlew24asu wrote:
    ok so this tells me she is a idiot. what else am I supposed to ascertain from it?

    I believe you're personally involved Jlew. What did you say you did for a living again? Covert demolition incorporated or something, wasn't it? :confused: :eek:
  • Posts: 10,118
    Byrnzie wrote:
    I believe you're are personally involved Jlew. What did you say you did for a living again? Covert demolition incorporated or something, wasn't it? :confused: :eek:


    shhhhhhh !!!!




    damn they're on to me
  • Posts: 10,118
    gue_barium wrote:
    Yet, that's how's its been played, treated.

    That's why I think it was being played, even on that day.

    o yea I remember. your the guy who talks to himself.
  • Posts: 5,515
    jlew24asu wrote:
    o yea I remember. your the guy who talks to himself.

    and you're the one-sentence wonder. no offense, i've seen you make a good post or two, but i can tell by the replies you've made on this subjuect that you're not altogether certain what this is all about, either.
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • Posts: 10,118
    gue_barium wrote:
    and you're the one-sentence wonder. no offense, i've seen you make a good post or two, but i can tell by the replies you've made on this subjuect that you're not altogether certain what this is all about, either.

    nor do I claim to know. I believe that bush or any other top US government official had no involvement in the planning or execution of the events on 9/11.

    as for wtc7. I think it is possible that the building was brought down on purpose but my gut tells me that it wasnt.

    IF it was however, I do not see it as some huge conspiracy. not one person was killed or injured and a building that would have had to be taken down at some point was destroyed. should there be a cover up? or does that make it ok ? absolutely not.
  • Posts: 1,294
    gue_barium wrote:
    and you're the one-sentence wonder. no offense, i've seen you make a good post or two, but i can tell by the replies you've made on this subjuect that you're not altogether certain what this is all about, either.

    Well what did happen then besides just someone reporting a building had collapsed before it actually fell. Even though the explanation that they knew it might fall at anytime and someone just misspoke is a very good explanation to me, it obviously isn't to you. So what did happen? Do you really think someone set off explosives in the building?
    Seeing visions of falling up somehow.

    Pensacola '94
    New Orleans '95
    Birmingham '98
    New Orleans '00
    New Orleans '03
    Tampa '08
    New Orleans '10 - Jazzfest
    New Orleans '16 - Jazzfest
    Fenway Park '18
    St. Louis '22
  • Posts: 1,143
    jlew24asu wrote:
    I believe that bush or any other top US government official had no involvement in the planning or execution of the events on 9/11.


    CIA
    11-2-2000 Portland. 12-8-2002 Seattle. 4-18-2003 Nashville. 5-30-2003 Vancouver. 10-25-2003 Bridge School. 9-2-2005 Vancouver.
    7-6-2006 Las Vegas. 7-20-2006 Portland. 7-22-2006 Gorge. 9-21-2009 Seattle. 9-22-2009 Seattle. 9-26-2009 Ridgefield. 9-25-2011 Vancouver.
    11-29-2013 Portland. 10-16-2014 Detroit. 8-8-2018 Seattle. 8-10-2018 Seattle. 8-13-2018 Missoula.  5-10-2024 Portland.  5-30-2024 Seattle.
  • Posts: 10,118
    Milestone wrote:
    CIA


    what about them?


    riot act sucks btw
  • Posts: 5,515
    MakingWaves wrote:
    Well what did happen then besides just someone reporting a building had collapsed before it actually fell. Even though the explanation that they knew it might fall at anytime and someone just misspoke is a very good explanation to me, it obviously isn't to you. So what did happen? Do you really think someone set off explosives in the building?

    I think this goes beyond poor journalism. The reporter was getting feeds from the london bbc office. where was the london bbc getting it's reports?

    The BBC spent an extra £270million on programmes and services in 2001/2002,

    the biggest increase in spending in the BBC’s history. On average people spent

    19 hours 54 minutes a week with the BBC – 43.8% of their viewing and listening

    and over a fifth of their leisure time (21.3%)....
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • Posts: 10,118
    gue_barium wrote:
    I think this goes beyond poor journalism. The reporter was getting feeds from the london bbc office. where was the london bbc getting it's reports?
    why do you answer that question for us. or give us your theory on where they got that information.
    gue_barium wrote:
    The BBC spent an extra £270million on programmes and services in 2001/2002,

    the biggest increase in spending in the BBC’s history. On average people spent

    19 hours 54 minutes a week with the BBC – 43.8% of their viewing and listening

    and over a fifth of their leisure time (21.3%)....

    who gives a fuck
  • Posts: 26,857
    jlew24asu wrote:


    riot act sucks btw
    right on!!!
    Take me piece by piece.....
    Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
  • Posts: 5,515
    jlew24asu wrote:
    why do you answer that question for us. or give us your theory on where they got that information.



    who gives a fuck

    I give a fuck. To a degree. To the degree that people like you are willing to believe what you are told and be happy and fat and not give a fuck.

    do you know who i am, jlew?
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • Posts: 10,118
    gue_barium wrote:
    I give a fuck. To a degree. To the degree that people like you are willing to believe what you are told and be happy and fat and not give a fuck.
    I am happy, not fat, and use common sense to come up with many of my conclusions.
    gue_barium wrote:
    do you know who i am, jlew?

    the fucking easter bunny? nice to meet ya
  • Posts: 5,700
    gue_barium wrote:
    do you know who i am, jlew?

    God, is that you? It's me, Margaret..........
  • Posts: 5,515
    farfromglorified wrote:
    God, is that you? It's me, Margaret..........

    dammit margaret, you weren't due until the next scene, act 3.
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • Posts: 6,038
    farfromglorified wrote:
    God, is that you? It's me, Margaret..........
    aha! So it's not just Stephen King books you like....it looks like you're also a Judy Blume fan! :)
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
Sign In
Register

Quick Links

Categories