9/11: BBC reports WTC7 collapse 25 minutes before it happened

DPrival78

if this has been discussed already, i apologize..

if it hasn't..

go here:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/260207building7.htm

and watch the video. a BBC journalist in NYC is reporting live on the collapse of building 7. the only problem is... you can see the building standing behind her - it didn't collapse until almost a half hour later.

huh??

Abookamongstthemany

I saw this! I thought it was pretty interesting, indeed.

jlew24asu

ok so this tells me she is a idiot. what else am I supposed to ascertain from it?

Abookamongstthemany

jlew24asu wrote:

ok so this tells me she is a idiot. what else am I supposed to ascertain from it?

BBC reported the building had collapsed before 5 pm. It didn't actually fall until 5:20. Later they go to this lady in NYC for live coverage of the event and there's the building, still standing, right behind her head! Just watch the clip.

DPrival78

jlew24asu wrote:

ok so this tells me she is a idiot. what else am I supposed to ascertain from it?

well, she wasn't the only person reporting it. bbc first reported at 4:57 that WTC7 collapsed. it actually collapsed at approx. 5:20.

why would they report that when no one expected that building to come down? WTC7 came down accidentally, according to official reports. where were they getting their info from?

they report something that didn't happen yet, and something that was entirely unexpected - then it happens 20 minutes later.. that doesn't seem odd to you?

jlew24asu

Abookamongstthemany wrote:

BBC reported the building had collapsed before 5 pm. It didn't actually fall until 5:20. Later they go to this lady in NYC for live coverage of the event and there's the building, still standing, right behind her head! Just watch the clip.

ok so BBC is the idiot. if they were fed that report from some US official dont you think it would be public knowledge? that can not be kept a secret no matter gag order the government tries to put on it.

jlew24asu

DPrival78 wrote:

well, she wasn't the only person reporting it. bbc first reported at 4:57 that WTC7 collapsed. it actually collapsed at approx. 5:20.

why would they report that when no one expected that building to come down? WTC7 came down accidentally, according to official reports. where were they getting their info from?

they report something that didn't happen yet, and something that was entirely unexpected - then it happens 20 minutes later.. that doesn't seem odd to you?

yes it does seem odd. so where did they get the info from? do you think the government "took out" anyone who knew ?

jlew24asu

movie is not working btw

gue_barium

I hadn't heard about this one.

I found another BBC report, with the timestamp, reporting the collapse 25 minutes before it happened.

http://ken-hall.blogspot.com/

norm

jlew24asu wrote:

movie is not working btw

It part of the conspiracy.


The video isn't working but could it be that she was mistaken as which building she was talking about? This seems like a reach. But then the whole thing seems far fetched to me.

DPrival78

jlew24asu wrote:

movie is not working btw

here's another link:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=rlFDd5Yjn3w

DPrival78

cutback wrote:

It part of the conspiracy.


The video isn't working but could it be that she was mistaken as which building she was talking about? This seems like a reach. But then the whole thing seems far fetched to me.

i don't think she was mistaken. only 2 buildings had collapsed at the time of her report. she was very specific about describing the building, as was the desk anchor who reported the same thing 15 or so minutes before he spoke to her.

i'd love to know who told the bbc wtc7 came down.

farfromglorified

hehe...the mp3 on that link is priceless. Poor woman deserves a raise.

CJMST3K

There was a firefighter on the radio arguing with the creator of one film questioning why WTC7 came down. He said he saw the fire first hand, since he was right there, and he said in his heavy NY accent that the film's producer wasn't there and doesnt know what he's talking about.

However - the footage you are posting is intriguing about it being announced beforehand.

I was living about 25 miles away from manhattan, watching on TV. They were showing WTC7 in the footage before it came down. I recall them talking about WTC7, that it may not last much longer, from either fire or damage. So, I was aware that it was a damaged building well before it fell. They showed close up footage of the building on tv, but I wasnt paying attention to what they were showing at the time - just what they were saying about the damage to WTC7 and how it was damaged.

El_Kabong

CJMST3K wrote:

There was a firefighter on the radio arguing with the creator of one film questioning why WTC7 came down. He said he saw the fire first hand, since he was right there, and he said in his heavy NY accent that the film's producer wasn't there and doesnt know what he's talking about.

However - the footage you are posting is intriguing about it being announced beforehand.

I was living about 25 miles away from manhattan, watching on TV. They were showing WTC7 in the footage before it came down. I recall them talking about WTC7, that it may not last much longer, from either fire or damage. So, I was aware that it was a damaged building well before it fell. They showed close up footage of the building on tv, but I wasnt paying attention to what they were showing at the time - just what they were saying about the damage to WTC7 and how it was damaged.

maybe the nist will finally get around to finishing their report on it....wonder what's taking them so long?

El_Kabong

cutback wrote:

It part of the conspiracy.


The video isn't working but could it be that she was mistaken as which building she was talking about? This seems like a reach. But then the whole thing seems far fetched to me.

she said the buildings name, not just it's number

MakingWaves

DPrival78 wrote:

well, she wasn't the only person reporting it. bbc first reported at 4:57 that WTC7 collapsed. it actually collapsed at approx. 5:20.

why would they report that when no one expected that building to come down? WTC7 came down accidentally, according to official reports. where were they getting their info from?

they report something that didn't happen yet, and something that was entirely unexpected - then it happens 20 minutes later.. that doesn't seem odd to you?

This must mean we need to add BBC to the conspiracy. They were part of it.

I am thinking with the building being on fire and the condition it was in they might have warned it was going to collapse and made sure people were clear of it. As the warning spread someone along the line thought they said the building had collapsed. Sounds like a good explanation to me.

jlew24asu

MakingWaves wrote:

I am thinking with the building being on fire and the condition it was in they might have warned it was going to collapse and made sure people were clear of it. As the warning spread someone along the line thought they said the building had collapsed. Sounds like a good explanation to me.

this is what i'm thinking too. but for the others who dont buy this explaination, why wouldnt the BBC come out and say they were told this by joe doe government official?

MakingWaves

jlew24asu wrote:

this is what i'm thinking too. but for the others who dont buy this explaination, why wouldnt the BBC come out and say they were told this by joe doe government official?

That is a good question. My bet would be they just didn't think it was that big of a deal and paid no attention to it.

Abookamongstthemany

jlew24asu wrote:

this is what i'm thinking too. but for the others who dont buy this explaination, why wouldnt the BBC come out and say they were told this by joe doe government official?

There is no way you guys would have bought this kind of explanation from us. It's quite a reach and involves disregarding what was actually reported.

hippiemom

No way this is a government conspiracy. If our government was going to tip off a network and give them an early exclusive, they sure as hell wouldn't pick the freakin' BBC! Now, if it had been Fox News, we might be onto something .....