What's up with our food?

AbookamongstthemanyAbookamongstthemany Posts: 8,209
edited March 2007 in A Moving Train
If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments



  • I watched up until the guy said that farmers around the world have too much food and they don't know what to do with it. :confused:

    I guess food shortages in Africa, India and North Korea don't count.


    I don't mind frankenfood. Do you know who Norman Borlaug is?

    His research with genetically modified food has led him to be credited with saving BILLIONS of lives. That's right, BILLIONS of people didn't starve to death because of one guy who nobody has ever even heard of.
    www.myspace.com/olafvonmastadon
  • I watched up until the guy said that farmers around the world have too much food and they don't know what to do with it. :confused:

    I guess food shortages in Africa, India and North Korea don't count.


    I don't mind frankenfood. Do you know who Norman Borlaug is?

    His research with genetically modified food has led him to be credited with saving BILLIONS of lives. That's right, BILLIONS of people didn't starve to death because of one guy who nobody has ever even heard of.
    The problem is not our ability to grow enough food, the problem is with distribution. Our grocery stores and individual consumers waste tons and tons of food that could go towards feeding poorer nations. Secondly, there is tons of grains, eggs, milk etc purchased and thrown out only to ensure that supply doesn't get out of hand and drive down prices which would hurt farmers.

    Frankenfoods are unnecessary. We do not need cows to produce more milk, nor do we need higher yields of crops. If we want to end hunger in Africa etc, we have to look at where the food is going and how it is being distributed.
  • El_KabongEl_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    I watched up until the guy said that farmers around the world have too much food and they don't know what to do with it. :confused:

    I guess food shortages in Africa, India and North Korea don't count.


    I don't mind frankenfood. Do you know who Norman Borlaug is?

    His research with genetically modified food has led him to be credited with saving BILLIONS of lives. That's right, BILLIONS of people didn't starve to death because of one guy who nobody has ever even heard of.


    where are these BILLIONS of ppl that are now suddenly well fed???

    you don't have a problem w/ puss in milk and consuming antibiotics when you don't need them? or a problem w/ fox firing reporters for refusing to lie in their report on the dangers of rbgh?
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • El_Kabong wrote:
    where are these BILLIONS of ppl that are now suddenly well fed???

    you don't have a problem w/ puss in milk and consuming antibiotics when you don't need them? or a problem w/ fox firing reporters for refusing to lie in their report on the dangers of rbgh?

    Oh ye of little faith Kabong. Here's a little bit on my buddy Norman, cause I guess it was beyond your capacity to google him.

    "During the mid-20th century, Borlaug led the introduction of these high yielding varieties combined with modern agricultural production techniques to Mexico, Pakistan, and India. As a result, Mexico became a net exporter of wheat by 1963. Between 1965 and 1970, wheat yields nearly doubled in Pakistan and India, greatly improving the food security in those nations. These collective increases in yield have been labeled the Green Revolution, and Borlaug is often credited with saving over a billion people from starvation.[2] He was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1970 in recognition of his contributions to world peace through increasing food supply."

    Now as far as puss in milk and (of course) FOX news. There's a difference between modifying fruits and vegetables, and modifying animals.

    I never said shit about stupid fuckin cows, why do you think I mentioned Borlaug?

    Sourdough figured it out and had a great response, why don't you just follow his/her lead next time.
    www.myspace.com/olafvonmastadon
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    GE crops aren't just for higher yields. They also offer greater resistance to natural threats like insects, drouts and floods. In areas like Darfur the land is dried up and normal crops can't survive in the soil. Just think if GE crops can increase crop yields in less than ideal conditions, then they can stop cutting down rain forest to plant coffee.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    I think I'm beginning to like the idea of cloned food. It should be called deja food...
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • El_KabongEl_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    Oh ye of little faith Kabong. Here's a little bit on my buddy Norman, cause I guess it was beyond your capacity to google him.

    "During the mid-20th century, Borlaug led the introduction of these high yielding varieties combined with modern agricultural production techniques to Mexico, Pakistan, and India. As a result, Mexico became a net exporter of wheat by 1963. Between 1965 and 1970, wheat yields nearly doubled in Pakistan and India, greatly improving the food security in those nations. These collective increases in yield have been labeled the Green Revolution, and Borlaug is often credited with saving over a billion people from starvation.[2] He was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1970 in recognition of his contributions to world peace through increasing food supply."

    Now as far as puss in milk and (of course) FOX news. There's a difference between modifying fruits and vegetables, and modifying animals.

    I never said shit about stupid fuckin cows, why do you think I mentioned Borlaug?

    Sourdough figured it out and had a great response, why don't you just follow his/her lead next time.


    ok, so again, where are these BILLIONS of ppl?

    you didn't say anything about the milk, true, but it was the 2nd video....you said you had no problems w/ franken foods, which rbgh could be classified...my bad, i thought you'd actually watch the videos in a thread you replied in, i won't give you as much credit next time

    edit:
    ok, i looked him and found this interesting

    "The phrase "over a billion lives saved" is often cited by others in reference to Norman Borlaug's work (e.g. here, and [1]). According to Jan Douglas here, Executive Assistant to the World Prize Foundation, the source of this number is Gregg Easterbrook's 1997 article "Forgotten Benefactor of Humanity",<ref></ref> the article states that the "form of agriculture that Borlaug preaches may have prevented a billion deaths." "

    MAY have does not equate to actual doing...so one guy says he MAY have and that means it's true, eh?

    well, if Gregg Easterbrook says it then it must be true!!

    LOL
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • El_Kabong wrote:
    ok, so again, where are these BILLIONS of ppl?

    you didn't say anything about the milk, true, but it was the 2nd video....you said you had no problems w/ franken foods, which rbgh could be classified...my bad, i thought you'd actually watch the videos in a thread you replied in, i won't give you as much credit next time

    edit:
    ok, i looked him and found this interesting

    "The phrase "over a billion lives saved" is often cited by others in reference to Norman Borlaug's work (e.g. here, and [1]). According to Jan Douglas here, Executive Assistant to the World Prize Foundation, the source of this number is Gregg Easterbrook's 1997 article "Forgotten Benefactor of Humanity",<ref></ref> the article states that the "form of agriculture that Borlaug preaches may have prevented a billion deaths." "

    MAY have does not equate to actual doing...so one guy says he MAY have and that means it's true, eh?

    well, if Gregg Easterbrook says it then it must be true!!

    LOL


    Laugh it up Mr. Giggles.

    You're right it doesn't necessarily have to be BILLION.

    Let's say the standard deviation could put it at 500 million.
    But I guess that's still not enough for you huh?

    Where are they?
    Pakistan
    India
    Sub-Saharan Africa

    "The form of agriculture that Borlaug preaches..."
    You mean the form of agriculture that this guy was the Grandaddy of.

    "A genetically modified food (Frankenfood) is a product developed from a DIFFERENT, DIFFERENT, DIFFERENT genetically modified organism (GMO) such as a crop plant, animal, or microorganism."

    So what other animal does RBGH come from? Cause i thought it was naturally produced by cows, and RBGH is just a synthetic version of that.

    So now Sourdough AND Ahnimus have it figured out, when are you comin on board?

    I can't believe I got suckered into talking about COWS. Especially with you. Ugh.
    www.myspace.com/olafvonmastadon
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    I have no idea who this Borlaug guy is, I'm not getting into that. I'm just saying GE crops are good. Until some kid is born with 8 legs from the dna they spliced with a spider and carrot mutates his mother. I just don't see it happening, and even if it did, 8 legs would be bonus, right?
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • onelongsongonelongsong Posts: 3,517
    Rankins, D. L., Jr. "The Importance of by-Products to the U.S. Beef Industry." Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 18, no. 2 (2002): 207-11, v. "The use of by-products as nutrient sources for beef cattle will continue to be driven by economics. As landfill prices continue to escalate, more by-product will become economically viable as cattle feed. These considerations will be counter-balanced by safety concerns. American consumers are becoming increasingly concerned with the production aspects of their food. The environmental concerns associated with additional landfills will have to be balanced against which by-products consumers will accept in the production of the beef that they consume. These will most assuredly heighten over the coming years."

    Loerch, S. C. "Efficacy of Plastic Pot Scrubbers as a Replacement for Roughage in High- Concentrate Cattle Diets." J Anim Sci 69, no. 6 (1991): 2321-8.

    Rankins, D. L., Jr., M. H. Poore, D. J. Capucille, and G. M. Rogers. "Recycled Poultry Bedding as Cattle Feed." Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 18, no. 2 (2002): 253-66.
    Tokarnia, C. H., J. Dobereiner, P. V. Peixoto, and S. S. Moraes. "Outbreak of Copper Poisoning in Cattle Fed Poultry Litter." Vet Hum Toxicol 42, no. 2 (2000): 92-5.

    here's a few
  • onelongsongonelongsong Posts: 3,517
    sourdough wrote:
    The problem is not our ability to grow enough food, the problem is with distribution. Our grocery stores and individual consumers waste tons and tons of food that could go towards feeding poorer nations. Secondly, there is tons of grains, eggs, milk etc purchased and thrown out only to ensure that supply doesn't get out of hand and drive down prices which would hurt farmers.

    Frankenfoods are unnecessary. We do not need cows to produce more milk, nor do we need higher yields of crops. If we want to end hunger in Africa etc, we have to look at where the food is going and how it is being distributed.

    or move them to where food can be grown and let them grow their own.
  • CommyCommy Posts: 4,984
    the biggest thing i got out of the first video was the control these small number of corporations have over our food supply. they literally affect billions of lives, and if something small goes wrong in their genetic altering of seeds we could be faced with world-wide famine. these very secret institutions are deciding the fate of billions, literally. for anyone that gives a shit about democracy or freedom this should be a very serious issue. even our very survival as a race could be at stake.
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    Commy wrote:
    the biggest thing i got out of the first video was the control these small number of corporations have over our food supply. they literally affect billions of lives, and if something small goes wrong in their genetic altering of seeds we could be faced with world-wide famine. these very secret institutions are deciding the fate of billions, literally. for anyone that gives a shit about democracy or freedom this should be a very serious issue. even our very survival as a race could be at stake.

    It's a trend these days.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • onelongsongonelongsong Posts: 3,517
    Commy wrote:
    the biggest thing i got out of the first video was the control these small number of corporations have over our food supply. they literally affect billions of lives, and if something small goes wrong in their genetic altering of seeds we could be faced with world-wide famine. these very secret institutions are deciding the fate of billions, literally. for anyone that gives a shit about democracy or freedom this should be a very serious issue. even our very survival as a race could be at stake.

    thus the reason i found a remote part of the country and raise food naturally. when genetically altered pollen contaminates the food chain; you will be coming to me for food. so i bet everything on this.
  • CommyCommy Posts: 4,984
    thus the reason i found a remote part of the country and raise food naturally. when genetically altered pollen contaminates the food chain; you will be coming to me for food. so i bet everything on this.
    remind me to get your address before too long...
  • El_KabongEl_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    Laugh it up Mr. Giggles.

    You're right it doesn't necessarily have to be BILLION.

    Let's say the standard deviation could put it at 500 million.
    But I guess that's still not enough for you huh?

    you're not very consistent, are you?

    you go from saying he saves BILLIONS of starving ppl, to a billion and now down to 500 million...are you gonne stay w/ this number?

    500million would be good enough for me, i just don't buy it.
    Where are they?
    Pakistan
    India
    Sub-Saharan Africa

    ok, that is where they used the franken food, now show me something saying billions, a billion or even 500 million ppl were saved from starving b/c of it. just b/c you grow more doesn't mean more ppl eat. the US produces more than enough food to feed everyone in the country, and yet there are plenty of starving ppl

    "Increasing food production however is not synonymous with increasing food security, and is only part of a larger equation. For example, Amartya Sen’s work has found that large historic famines have not been caused by decreases in food supply, but by socioeconomic dynamics and a failure of public action. [16] There are several claims about how the Green Revolution may have decreased food security for some people. One such claim involves the shift of subsistence-oriented cropland to cropland oriented towards production of grain for export and/or animal feed. For example, the Green Revolution replaced much of the land used for pulses that fed Indian peasants for wheat, which did not make up a large portion of the peasant diet [17]. Also, the pesticides involved in rice production eliminated fish and weedy green vegetables from the diets of Asian rice farmers [18].

    The transition from traditional agriculture in which inputs were generated on-farm to Green Revolution agriculture, which required the purchase of inputs, lead to the widespread establishment of rural credit institutions. Smaller farmers often went into debt, which in many cases result in a loss of rights to their farmland [20]. The increased level of mechanization on larger farms made possible by the Green Revolution removed an important source of employment from the rural economy [21]. Because wealthier farmers had better access to credit and land, the Green Revolution increased class disparities. Because some regions were able to adopt Green Revolution agriculture more readily than others (for political or geographical reasons), interregional economic disparities increased as well."

    "The form of agriculture that Borlaug preaches..."
    You mean the form of agriculture that this guy was the Grandaddy of.

    no, i don't, your boy gregg easterbrook <ya know, the guy who started teh billion starving saved claim> means, take it up w/ him
    "A genetically modified food (Frankenfood) is a product developed from a DIFFERENT, DIFFERENT, DIFFERENT genetically modified organism (GMO) such as a crop plant, animal, or microorganism."

    So what other animal does RBGH come from? Cause i thought it was naturally produced by cows, and RBGH is just a synthetic version of that.

    and it is not needed
    So now Sourdough AND Ahnimus have it figured out, when are you comin on board?

    what did sourdogh get?? that the problem isn't producing enough food, it's the distribution of it? no, i get that...that we waste tons of food that could feed the starving ppl? no, i get that, too...frankenfoods are unnecessary? that we don't need cows to produce more milk? we don't need higher yields of crops? to end hunger look at where the food is going, not how ot make more? no, i understand all that and agree...looks like i'm already on board, you, however don't seem to bo on board. you see how you contradict sourdough?

    sourdough: frankenfood is unnecessary, we don't need it
    you: i don't mind frankenfood, it's a good thing
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    know1 wrote:
    I think I'm beginning to like the idea of cloned food. It should be called deja food...
    hehee

    how about, dijon vu?

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
Sign In or Register to comment.