So now can we get rid of Affirmative Action?

2»

Comments

  • unsung
    unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    What about a few years ago when the Lions wanted Mariucci, he became available and they got him, without interviewing a black candidate. If they were dead set on hiring him in the beginning, as they were, interviewing a black candidate would have been a waste of everyone's time.

    So now if Dungy were to be released from the Colts and say a team wanted him bad should they be forced to interview someone from every ethnicity that is represented in the league?

    If we are ever to get past racism we need to start treating everyone equal and with the same standards.
  • jimed14
    jimed14 Posts: 9,488
    unsung wrote:
    What about a few years ago when the Lions wanted Mariucci, he became available and they got him, without interviewing a black candidate. If they were dead set on hiring him in the beginning, as they were, interviewing a black candidate would have been a waste of everyone's time.

    So now if Dungy were to be released from the Colts and say a team wanted him bad should they be forced to interview someone from every ethnicity that is represented in the league?

    If we are ever to get past racism we need to start treating everyone equal and with the same standards.

    That rule was needed at some point ... but, it doesn't seem they do anymore ... Dungy, Romeo Crennel, Lovie Smith, Mike Singletary, Marvin Lewis, Herm Edwards, Mike Tomlin ... (did I miss any?) ... they needed to do it to get the ball rolling, because the NFL just kept rotating the same shitty white coaches over and over ... but, it worked, now they have proved that black head coaches can be every bit as good, and shitty, as white coaches.

    But, overall, I think the rule was a success.
    "You're one of the few Red Sox fans I don't mind." - Newch91

    "I don't believe in damn curses. Wake up the damn Bambino and have me face him. Maybe I'll drill him in the ass." --- Pedro Martinez
  • justam
    justam Posts: 21,415
    unsung wrote:
    A black man has reached the most powerful job on the planet. There should no longer be any excuses for black people to hold whatever job that they strive for.

    Thoughts?

    I think affirmative action is one of the reasons things have changed.

    It was kinda like a parent forcing kids to share. It has become a habit now--which is good.

    People have become accustomed to the mix of races and genders in the work place more than they would have been without the enforced "sharing" of opportunities.
    &&&&&&&&&&&&&&
  • As far as I am concerned, Affirmative action is OVER.
    I never want to hear about it again. We are all equal. Its over with.
    Get em a Body Bag Yeeeeeaaaaa!
    Sweep the Leg Johnny.
  • PJ_Saluki
    PJ_Saluki Posts: 1,006
    Quote from Timothy Egan's column in the Nov. 6 New York Times.

    "Obama’s ascendancy is likely to have the ironic effect of ending affirmative action, and the old identity politics. He became only the second Democrat since Franklin Roosevelt to win more than 51 percent of the popular vote not because he’s black, but because he is smarter, with better ideas, and showed leadership under fire. This was a victory for meritocracy.

    If affirmative action survives, it will be more class-based, as Obama suggested on the campaign trail."
    "Almost all those politicians took money from Enron, and there they are holding hearings. That's like O.J. Simpson getting in the Rae Carruth jury pool." -- Charles Barkley
  • PJ_Saluki wrote:


    If affirmative action survives, it will be more class-based, as Obama suggested on the campaign trail."

    The Times is a super far left newspaper.
    So now we have to still accept affirmative action if a person makes under a certian amount of money?
    No thanks, thats bullshit. Its over IMO.
    Get em a Body Bag Yeeeeeaaaaa!
    Sweep the Leg Johnny.
  • digster
    digster Posts: 1,293
    As of today, less than 30% of students in all colleges are minorities, which is a hell of an improvement from less than twenty years ago. Today, I believe the number of minorities in so-called 'elite institutions' was at approximately 10%. That being said, affirmative action never sat quite right with me, at least when it came to the workplace. The entire idea of affirmative action is to get minorities the proper training so they will do better, which means their kids will do better, etc. Problem is it serves nobody any good to elevate someone to a position that does not have the proper training and would perform inadequately due to the lack of training. It doesn't serve the business any good, and it doesn't serve the employee any good. The trick is not to get that individual the job, it is to get him the training, it is to get him an education. I understand the use of affirmative action in education better in this regard, but I still feel like it is an inadequate and ill-fitting band-aid on a bullet wound to the head. It's not solving the real problems. The need is to build equal opportunities, or as close as possible, from elementary schools on up. And ideally, with the improvement of our school system from an early age, more and more black students will make the leap to elite colleges without affirmative action, and the process could die away.

    See, the problem with many conservatives when it comes to this issue is that they poo-poo this issue, and simultaneously shoot down any alternatives. If I had my way, I'd do away with affirmative action, but I would heartily increase the money for early childhood education. I'd rebuild every school in the country. I'd make sure kids in the inner cities had smaller class sizes, access to college counselors, and adequate after-school centers. When I float these options, you call it 'welfare.' So what the hell are we supposed to do then? Affirmative action may not be the answer, but going on "as is" is not the answer, either. So until you get serious about supporting these programs and properly funding them, it sounds like you have no solutions to offer besides "Affirmative Action Bad!!!!"
  • Gonzo1977
    Gonzo1977 Posts: 1,696
    I think an important thing to remember as someone else stated earlier, is that we all don't start out on equal ground.

    The odds are stacked on anyone coming from the poorest of neiborhoods and upbringings compared to that of people who automatically Inherit wealth and privilege.

    There are many in this country (no fault of their own) that automatically inherit the access to the top schools, and social networking outlets that the poorest in this country simply do not have.

    Although I ultimately believe that true talent shines through in the end, I don't see it unfair to give someone the equal opportunity and a fighting chance to compete.

    That being said, I can also see the flip side of the coin where some may argue that Afirmative Action is simply currput and nothing more than an unfair punishment put in place to ease our "White Guilt".

    Personally, I think this ultimatley is a product of a broken class system in this country and one that we are merely putting a bandage over rather than focusing on healing a much bigger cut.
  • puremagic
    puremagic Posts: 1,907
    unsung wrote:
    A black man has reached the most powerful job on the planet. There should no longer be any excuses for black people to hold whatever job that they strive for.

    Thoughts?


    So if Obama had lost the election, would affirmative action still be necessary? How about Palin or Hiliary, both of whom, as minorities can use the affirmative action laws, because I'm sure you know that affirmative action was not just for blacks.

    Funny how you never hear these colleges with high profile football and basketball teams complaining about affirmative action. These universities that draw millions of dollars for the sports programs. Athletes on full scholarships, that the read and write on a jr. high level. Athletes who's mathematical, science and english skills make you shudder, yet they somehow always maintain the NCAA qualify grade level.

    I'd like to see affirmative action done away with, it can always be reinstituted if needed.
    SIN EATERS--We take the moral excrement we find in this equation and we bury it down deep inside of us so that the rest of our case can stay pure. That is the job. We are morally indefensible and absolutely necessary.
  • Jeremy1012
    Jeremy1012 Posts: 7,170
    The Times is a super far left newspaper.
    So now we have to still accept affirmative action if a person makes under a certian amount of money?
    No thanks, thats bullshit. Its over IMO.
    Super far left? :D You've never read many super far left newspapers have you?
    "I remember one night at Muzdalifa with nothing but the sky overhead, I lay awake amid sleeping Muslim brothers and I learned that pilgrims from every land — every colour, and class, and rank; high officials and the beggar alike — all snored in the same language"
  • Pacomc79
    Pacomc79 Posts: 9,404
    I think there are probably ways to improve the program but honestly breaking a cycle takes effort.

    If you think anyone can waltz in and change the attitudes of people rebuild old or broken infrastructure and just convince great teachers to go into failing often dangerous schools to change the world good luck.

    Some of the issues are personal attitudes, and Obama winning probably gives some people a great deal of hope they never had, it may mean a few people study harder, care more, or don't join a neighborhood gang not to stereotype a particular group here gangs are just part of lower income life.

    Hopefully this presidency will be a return to focus on our affairs internally and namely our infrastructure.

    I believe Nebraska eliminated their affirmative action program in this election for the record.
    My Girlfriend said to me..."How many guitars do you need?" and I replied...."How many pairs of shoes do you need?" She got really quiet.
  • mammasan
    mammasan Posts: 5,656
    Speaking as a minority I have never been a huge fan of Affirmative Action. It had it's time and place but I think in this day and age we should get rid of it, not because I believe that the playing field is level but because it reflects poorly on minorities. In my opinion the playing field is not level but not because of race, but because of poverty and education. It just so happens that more minorities are affected by poverty and poor education, per capita, than whites so it looks like a racial issue.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • Pacomc79
    Pacomc79 Posts: 9,404
    mammasan wrote:
    Speaking as a minority I have never been a huge fan of Affirmative Action. It had it's time and place but I think in this day and age we should get rid of it, not because I believe that the playing field is level but because it reflects poorly on minorities. In my opinion the playing field is not level but not because of race, but because of poverty and education. It just so happens that more minorities are affected by poverty and poor education, per capita, than whites so it looks like a racial issue.


    makes a lot of sense to change that takes work in the communities though with parents and getting them to care along with teacher retention, quality of education and that brings up other horrific Federal Education policies like NCLB. Yikes.
    My Girlfriend said to me..."How many guitars do you need?" and I replied...."How many pairs of shoes do you need?" She got really quiet.
  • mammasan
    mammasan Posts: 5,656
    Pacomc79 wrote:
    makes a lot of sense.

    A black child born to a upper middle class family is going to have a better chance of success than a white child born to a poor family. The black child will have the opportunity to go to a good school, the white child will probably not. The black child's family will have the financial means to send their child to college, the white child's family will not. The white child will probably be raised in a high crime neighborhood while the black child will not. All of these factors are economic and educational, not racial, so we need to take the focus off of the inequality being a racial issue and of it being one of economics and education.

    I grew up in a poor neighborhood but was fortunate to have been placed in the advanced class in elementary school. These course there had me better prepared for high school and my parent's worked their asses off to send me to a private high school. The local high school was a mess and was more akin to a juvenile detention center than a place of learning. Had my parent's not had the financial means to send me to the private school who knows where I would be today and my race or ethnicity never played a factor and it bothers me that my acceptance to high school or college may have been judged not solely on my merits but on my last name.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul