The democrats are all about the people

Yes, democrats want to keep people poor to keep in power, that makes fucking sense. So stupid. All I hear all day long is how democrats want to give handouts to people who don't deserve it, and now you want to make the claim they want to keep them poor? Unreal.

As for the $250k in taxes for small businesses ...... it's $250k in PROFITS that will be taxed at a higher rate ... that's *AFTER* expenses ... people are fucking stupid. Since when is making $250k in profits something to be avoided becuase it will be taxed a bit more? It's a few percentage points.

And the Joe the Plumber cries are baseless ... HAVE YOU SEEN THE WHOLE VIDEO??? Here it is, how exactly did he silence Joe???? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFC9jv9jfoA ok, again, did you watch it? Watch the whole video. How did Obama silence him?? Instead of taking 3 words out of a 6 minute discussion out of context, watch the whole interview!

And then, at the end of this video you have posted, this guy claims Obama should be an abomination because he's the product of a white mother and a black father ... great, spread more ignorant race hate.

Finally, people blame the Obama supporters for only liking him because he's a good speaker and yet, I've seen this video MANY times ... so, a slick talker who supports the repubs is ok? Please form your own thoughts.

prytoj wrote:

There was a time when I had no idea who I was voting for
That was until I looked at the record.

Obama can clain credit for ONE SINGLE PIECE of legislation that I can see.
It's called the Exelon bill, passed when he was a state legislator, which was watered down by lobbyists of the same nuclear power industry the bill was aimed at.

Maybe the smarter folks here can tell me what other legislation Obama has brought and was able to pass.

Google "obama exelon" for reference.

The guy is a media creation, plain and simple.

That's called forming my own thoughts, jimjed should try it sometime.
Thanks for the bump

Why don't you take that same comb and take a look at McCain's abhorrent voting record. But of course we can't do that...right?

John's a "Hero"..."A Maverick"..."He Crosses Party Lines"

Oh...Wait a minute. How many times has he voted with Bush?

And how about John's voting in regads to the "Brave Men and Women In The Military" that he so claims to care for...OOPS...Sore spot!!

How about Energy? Sarah Palin's specialty

Ooops...

Forget about Windpower, Solar Power, Alternative Energy...That's absurd.

Funny how an Arizona Senator can get so far when he votes against

THE SUN...

Drill baby Drill

prytoj wrote:

McCain has voted along party lines far less than Obama

Sorry, that's a fact.

Well...I should hope so since he's been doing it about 25 years longer than Obama.

McCain has done nothing but dry hump Big Business his entire political career. The evidence is in his record...It's a fucking joke and it certainly isn't a voting record that one should be very proud of.

Obama's community record in Chicago is unmatched.

Obama after Harvard Law School could have gone on to become one of the richest most successful lawyers in the country and what did he choose...

COMMUNITY SERVICE!!!
TEACHING!!!

Really take a look here and examine these two men. Look at their records.

It's very obvious.

I don't know how anyone could possibly say that McCain is the more progressive candidate.

He's just Reagan, Bush Sr. and W all rolled into one bitter 75 year old hack.

prytoj wrote:

look at the record, not another carefully edited mix tape

refer to north carolina '00

next...

Dude, he's absolutely correct...

http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/is_it_true_john_mccain_voted_with.html

McCain did in fact vote with Bush that often; 95% in 2007 alone. Just because you're right in your own head doesn't make you right in reality.

Since it is Halloween.... was that Karl Rove dressed up as a young black man?

prytoj wrote:

the fact is Obama is the most partisan politician in Congress, there's just no debating that. If anything, McCain is TOO centrist for most conservatives.
That's just plain and simple.
next...

And by the way, this is what we call dodging the argument that we were having. I believe you tried to call jmed out on it in another thread.

prytoj wrote:

Yeah, how'd he get that Harvard education
Look it up and think for yourself....

And If McCain is dry-humping big busineess, then why did he limit himself to public finance, while Obama "has taken money from Corporations and Corporate lawyers by far more than McCain" (nader)

don't drink the coolaid

If McCain is dry-humping, then Obama's holding the KY and a rubber glove.
next...


need any more clarity than that?
any disputing that with some facts?

And you continue to dodge. We were talking about McCain's voting record as being similar to Bush's, remember? I know that's a rough subject to defend.

prytoj wrote:

Thanks for giving me a piece of meterial from an Obama-run (ahhhhh Annenburg-run, sorry) website.

whatever,

the fact is Obama is the most partisan politician in Congress, there's just no debating that. If anything, McCain is TOO centrist for most conservatives.
That's just plain and simple.
next...

ahh yes, the Annenburgs ... while Obama was a part of their foundation ... Walter Annenburg was a well know ... REPUBLICAN ... who served as an ambassador to England under Nixon and did many things for Reagan ...

soooooooo partisan for Obama.