Options
Ron Paul Warning...
yahamita
Posts: 1,514
I knew all the rules, but the rules did not know me...GUARANTEED!
Hail Hail HIPPIEMOM
Wishlist Foundation-
http://www.wishlistfoundation.org
info@wishlistfoundation.org
Hail Hail HIPPIEMOM
Wishlist Foundation-
http://www.wishlistfoundation.org
info@wishlistfoundation.org
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
People will follow along.
Hail Hail HIPPIEMOM
Wishlist Foundation-
http://www.wishlistfoundation.org
info@wishlistfoundation.org
This part really lets you know Paul calls the straight dope:
If I opened it now would you not understand?
Listen to the interview and see for yourself
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqN2EKuXX2g
:(
I think thats true.
But Perhaps other stations dont really want to have their viewers hear/listen to that kinda stuff.
My hope was that McCain was enough of a patriot, having invested so much in this country, might have been duping the money masters and, once in office, given them the finger.
I was projecting my hopes on a candidate, but when given the options, I played the odds there, long as they certainly were. Cuz Obama was clearly the NWO choice all along, if you connect the dots.
Ah... ya... fucking globalists.
My problem with AJ is the whole nasty overtone, but I guess he's gotta sell tapes or whatever.
Really though, Ron should drop these fucking truthers. Their perception is so misplaced.
And to the truthers: All of your theories miss out on the most important thing. The humans are too stupid. It's the principalities you have to watch out for. That's the true evil. Thus you should turn inward first.
Chew on it.
Have a listen to some of his broadcast stuff from Y2K. It's simply total bullshit. This clip probably isn't the best source since it's commented on by Cooper (another iffy character), but nonetheless it contains plenty of direct broadcast from Alex Jones that should be more than enough to pretty much disqualify this joker from being taken very seriously.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eA6c2PmpNg
Even if you think Alex Jones is completely off his rocker you still can't discount the things Ron Paul is saying.
Cooper is iffy for several reasons. For one, listen to his stuff about aliens. Later on, he reneges on pretty much all of it himself. So if you listen and believe his stuff about aliens, just realize that it later gets mostly disowned by none other than himself. You can find that willingness to change opinion admirable or view it with more cynicism... that's a matter of opinion. The fellow is pretty paranoid on way too many subjects. Now, he did get killed in the end in a suspicious manner... but that alone doesn't validate all of his far out claims.
Here's some stuff pointing toward him being an iffy character as well:
"By 1998, the USA federal government had several outstanding warrants for Cooper and his wife for tax evasion and bank fraud. Cooper’s Chinese-born wife, Annie, and their two daughters had left the United States in June 2000; Cooper remained at his home in Eagar, Apache County, Arizona.
Cooper had made it clear, both online and on air, that he would not surrender to the police. 'According to Glenn Jacobs, a local newspaperman who knew Cooper, "he kept an AK-47 just inside his front door by a magazine rack."'
At 11:40 pm, 5 November, 2001, Apache County Sheriff’s deputies attempted to serve an arrest warrant at Cooper’s residence. Earlier that day Cooper had seen a man driving past his home, ran out, jumped in his car and drove after the man, forcing him to pull over, and threatening him at gunpoint. The man, a local doctor, waited until Cooper left then called the police, who issued a warrant against Cooper for "aggravated assault with a deadly weapon."
His stuff about 9/11, yeah... that warrants a second look since he pretty much predicts Osama being blamed for a major event before it actually took place. That part is hard for me to dispute against him. However, was it a false flag operation? Evidence about that is mixed at best. To the original poster: Check out William (Bill) Cooper on 9/11 for some real juicy conspiracy stuff. It's much more interesting than the stuff that currently has your attention about Obama.
Good Interview.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Obama is a corporate stooge
Favorable coverage from media = Obama preselected by corporations
New monetary system = loss of sovereignty
World government on the horizon
All wealth being transferred to world corporations
Bush was used to fool right wing to accept world government
Obama being rolled out to fool left wing into accepting world government
Control world money, military and resources = world government
World government is too big to be effective
That's the little summary I make out of the interview. There's a lot of huge leaps with little or no evidence provided by either Ron Paul or Alex Jones in all of this. World government is too big and too full of bureaucracy to be effective... yeah, I can believe that. However, I also think world government might be the only thing to bring unity to a world fractured by nationalism... where people don't care much about one another unless they share the same imaginary line forming a border on a map. Our indifference toward places like Africa is often alarming. I'm not going to make any leap and claim I'm for world government or anything like that. But this all starts with an assumption that it is bad, which hasn't really been illustrated.
Sharing a currency does not automatically equate to loss of sovereignty as the EU has demonstrated. It has benefits and detriments unto its own. Barack receiving favorable coverage does not equate to preselection for the presidency. That's a stretch and if it were true, why would any reporting about his reverend or Ayer's have surfaced if he was preselected for only favorable coverage? Do we then need to assume "They" wanted us to not grow suspcious and such? Do you see how many things you have to keep postulating to keep this theory intact and what a boogie man "They" become? What do "They" stand to gain? Why are "They" separate from us and who exactly are "They?"
:rolleyes:
that would be cute if it wasn't so dumb.
"Obama's main opponent in this election on November 4th (was) not John McCain, it (was) ignorance."~Michael Moore
"i'm feeling kinda righteous right now. with my badass motherfuckin' ukulele!"
~ed, 8/7
Hail Hail HIPPIEMOM
Wishlist Foundation-
http://www.wishlistfoundation.org
info@wishlistfoundation.org
Great, good to know that something that should be an American problem and dealt with in America is now going to be dealt with outside interests. It doesn't surprise me though.
you're right about humans being stupid...most of you believe the governments bullshit version of 9-11
Still don't see why the loss of a single superpower in the world (as I believe has been happening in the last 10 years to the US) is a bad thing.
Its everyones problem buddy.
It isn't the loss of the "single worlds superpower" that many are concerned with. It's the loss of sovereignty.
Look, you can say that all you want, and I don't necessarily disagree; however, if you are fine with other countries being able to decide American policy regarding its fiscal and monetary policy, so be it. Just realize that I will not ever agree with something like that. The dollar is an American currency. Yes I know other countries rely on it because its become the currency of the world. That doesn't matter, those countries allowed themselves to get in that position of tying themselves to our currency. Just because they allowed that doesn't mean we are necessarily responsible for their well being if our dollar tanks and it certainly doesn't mean we should let them influence our decisions regarding our country's monetary policy. We've been doing that since 1912 and look where that's getting us. :rolleyes:
Ahahahahaaaa. The truth hurts.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
***********************
"We've laid the groundwork. It's like planting the seeds. And next year, it's spring." - Nader
***********************
Prepare for tending to your garden, America.
World government is unConstitutional.
World currency is unConstitutional.
it is a further centralizing of power, it represents domination, not cohesion. It's inevitable that power structures exist, no matter how much "unity" the utopians might desire. The question is, would we like to have more influence on the power structures (a more localized government), or less?
And review WTO, NAFTA & SPP, the IMF and WHO for direct evidence that the attempt to move to a new world order is on. They don't put it in our face, but they don't really try to hide it either.
Direct, official, documentary evidence.
I've heard of a movement in Europe to abolish the EU, and I hope what I've heard on that is true.
Holy Xenophobic much??? Spoken like someone who truly has NO CLUE how the stock market and your economy works!!
Your stocks are not traded soley by Americans. Products made in America are not only sold IN America!!...so to FIX the crisis he NEEDS to mend some fences OUTSIDE your borders!
Don't let your fear close your mind to what could potentially be a GOOD thing for your country.
No one here is afraid of people who are different. just stop already, you look foolish.
unless of course it turns out to be a good idea.
Holy jumping to conclusions much??? Spoken like someone who assumes I don't know what the stock market is or how my economy works when I have had formal schooling in it.
Mending fences outside our borders and taking other countries' advice on what we should do with our monetary system are two completely different things.