Pink Floyd - The Final Cut

2

Comments

  • elmer
    elmer Posts: 1,683
    Atom Heart Mother!

    ....not really a fan though, just wanted to contribute.
  • Omega47
    Omega47 Posts: 43
    AndySlash wrote:
    No.

    No. No. No. No. No.

    If any of you are going to get The Final Cut, do yourself a favor and find a version without WTTBF on it. That's how the album was meant to be heard. I've loved WTTBF since the first time I heard it, but it does NOT belong on the TFC album; it is decidedly a part of The Wall narrative. Yes, it was originally released as the lead single, but that was when TFC was still going to be a collection of Wall-era outtakes (of which WTTBF was one)/Wall movie versions of songs and not the thematic album it turned out to be.

    If you want to hear WTTBF, just get Echoes. It belongs more on there than it does The Final Cut.
    When the Tigers Broke Free is really out of place on The Final Cut. But they don't sell it new any other way anymore. I'm lucky my dad bought his copy in the 80's.
    www.myspace.com/fusionsong
  • paddy
    paddy Posts: 104
    Wasn't this basically a Roger Waters album with Gilmour and Mason playing on it?
    Anyhow, I would suggest Animals, Obscured by clouds, atom heart mother, meddle and a saucerful of secrets as much more under-rated than Final cut.
    Hello, is there anybody in there?
  • Omega47
    Omega47 Posts: 43
    paddy wrote:
    Wasn't this basically a Roger Waters album with Gilmour and Mason playing on it?
    Anyhow, I would suggest Animals, Obscured by clouds, atom heart mother, meddle and a saucerful of secrets as much more under-rated than Final cut.
    No way. The Final Cut is only less underrated than some of those albums because it's so underrated. It's like famous because it wasn't famous. Animals, Meddle, Obscured By Clouds, and Saucerful are all REALLY famous compared to The Final Cut. Believe me, I'm a Pink Floyd junkie. I used to not need to eat because my body ran on Pink Floyd. Atom Heart Mother is a great album, only one I agree with you being more underrated than TFC. The first four tracks are masterpieces. The last track is horribly uncalled for, Alan's Psychedelic Breakfast, but it's bearable, since AHM was based quite a bit around food. Animals didn't get much radio airplay only because all the songs were so long, and the others were released before DSOTM, so they're definitely "obscured." Haha, Pink Floyd pun.
    www.myspace.com/fusionsong
  • rrivers
    rrivers Posts: 3,698
    In high school, I had some friends who were big into Pink Floyd. I remember hearing "The Final Cut" then and loving it! For some reason, I didn't buy it then and actually didn't get it until last year. It didn't blow me away when I heard it, but I think that is because I had it built up in my head so much. I also think my musical tastes have changed where back in high school I was much more into a more accessible album like "The Wall" and now I am more open to a weirder album like "Piper at the Gates of Dawn" which I just bought recently.
    "We're fixed good, lamp-wise."
  • I prefer Ummagumma, Relics, Zabriskie point, 'More' and a few dozen rarites, live stuff from that era anyday, like Beset by creatures of the deep, embryo, and thier various recorded jams.

    As for pre solo waters solo albums I much prefer Music From the Body, at least the Waters parts, although Final Cut is a Rememberence Day classic.
  • Ledbetterman10
    Ledbetterman10 Posts: 17,002
    an acquired taste to see the least. I like a couple songs (Fletcher Memorial Home is great) but actually prefer Roger's "Pros and Cons" to it.

    Not Now John is another underrated gem; cut from the cloth of Nile Song and Young Lust
    2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1

    Pearl Jam bootlegs:
    http://wegotshit.blogspot.com
  • pearljim
    pearljim Posts: 1,312
    very good album. Roger's solo tour with selections from this album was awesome....Roger gave the band a choice of The Wall or The Final Cut and the band chose.......So yes The Final Cut was just that and I do consider it a Roger solo project rather than Pink Floyd....still good none the less.




    AMUSED TO DEATH is FANTASTIC!
    If you have a chance to make life better for others, and fail to do so, you are wasting your time on this earth.

    Roberto Clemente.
  • pink1969
    pink1969 Posts: 245
    Animals is by far my favorite floyd album (I mean cd) too.
    Shine on all you crazy diamonds!!!!
    Angel

    Are we getting something out of this......all encompassing trip?

    Paramount, NYC '94; Randall's Island, NYC '96; Brendan Byrne, NJ '98;
    EV solo, NYC 1 '08; EV solo, NJPAC '08; Philadelphia, PA 10/30/2009;
    Hartford, CT '10; Newark, NJ '10
  • Get_Right
    Get_Right Posts: 14,164
    One of my first three cds and still one of my favs

    GREAT CD

    too bad it was the nail in the coffin for PF
  • Nakedeye66
    Nakedeye66 Posts: 94
    Without a doubt the most underrated Floyd album. But what we have here is Floyd chartering into what's awfully close to Roger Waters solo territory. I like to think of The Wall-The Final Cut-Pros And Cons Of Hitchhiking as almost a trilogy. There is a connection between all and they are very similar (with each a bit less powerful than the one that proceeded it).

    Great underrated album, but easy to see why in 1983 the rest of the band was saying "what the f*&k about the rest of us". Great album indeed that doesn't get the credit it deserves, but also a point where Roger's ego was destroying the band and neither Roger nor the remaining Floyd would ever be as good without the other.
  • One of my favorite albums EVER. I love the lyrics to this one:

    The Fletcher Memorial Home (Waters)

    Take all your overgrown infants away somewhere
    And build them a home, a little place of their own.
    The Fletcher Memorial
    Home for Incurable Tyrants and Kings.

    And they can appear to themselves every day
    On closed circuit T.V.
    To make sure they're still real.
    It's the only connection they feel.
    "Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome, Reagan and Haig,
    Mr. Begin and friend, Mrs. Thatcher, and Paisly,
    "Hello Maggie!"
    Mr. Brezhnev and party.
    "Scusi dov'è il bar?"
    The ghost of McCarthy,
    The memories of Nixon.
    "Who's the bald chap?"
    "Good-bye!"
    And now, adding colour, a group of anonymous latin-
    American meat packing glitterati.

    Did they expect us to treat them with any respect?
    They can polish their medals and sharpen their
    Smiles, and amuse themselves playing games for awhile.
    Boom boom, bang bang, lie down you're dead.

    Safe in the permanent gaze of a cold glass eye
    With their favorite toys
    They'll be good girls and boys
    In the Fletcher Memorial Home for colonial
    Wasters of life and limb.

    Is everyone in?
    Are you having a nice time?
    Now the final solution can be applied.
    "All the rusted signs we ignore throughout our lives"--Ed
  • Human Tide
    Human Tide Posts: 329
    One of my favorite albums EVER. I love the lyrics to this one:

    Is everyone in?
    Are you having a nice time?
    Now the final solution can be applied.

    Here's one of the things I love about Roger Waters and Pink Floyd. That last line has just the perfect moral ambiguity to fit the rest of the song. Waters uses a Nazi metaphor to describe an appropriate way to deal with the world leaders that he considers criminals. Would putting them all in a room and killing them really be the best way to go, or isn't that exactly the kind of brutality that they are accused of? Maybe they deserve it. Maybe we should be bigger than that and show the mercy they lack. Is applying a "final solution" acceptable if the people are "bad" enough? Great stuff.
  • The lyrics to the title track always blew my mind too:

    The Final Cut (Waters)

    Through the fish-eyed lens of tear stained eyes
    I can barely define the shape of this moment in time
    And far from flying high in clear blue skies
    I'm spiraling down to the hole in the ground where I hide.

    If you negotiate the minefield in the drive
    And beat the dogs and cheat the cold electronic eyes
    And if you make it past the shotgun in the hall,
    Dial the combination, open the priesthole
    And if I'm in I'll tell you what's behind the wall.

    There's a kid who had a big hallucination
    Making love to girls in magazines.
    He wonders if you're sleeping with your new found faith.
    Could anybody love him
    Or is it just a crazy dream?

    And if I show you my dark side
    Will you still hold me tonight?
    And if I open my heart to you
    And show you my weak side
    What would you do?
    Would you sell your story to Rolling Stone?
    Would you take the children away
    And leave me alone?
    And smile in reassurance
    As you whisper down the phone?
    Would you send me packing?
    Or would you take me home?

    Thought I oughta bare my naked feelings,
    Thought I oughta tear the curtain down.
    I held the blade in trembling hands
    Prepared to make it but just then the phone rang
    I never had the nerve to make the final cut.

    "Hello? Listen, I think I've got it. Okay, listen its a HaHa!"
    "All the rusted signs we ignore throughout our lives"--Ed
  • brain of c wrote:
    it's not pink
    floyd.

    it

    sucks out

    loud.
    It's not Pink Floyd. But Roger Waters was dead on. Everyone involved with that album made it amazing. And even though it was primarily a Waters effort than a Pink Floyd effort, doesn't mean it sucks.
    www.myspace.com/fusionsong
  • dirt
    dirt Posts: 398
    Not only is it a good album, but if any of you still care about great audio quality, this is one of the better rock recordings of the past forty years. Listen to it on a stereo system that has good power and you'll hear what I'm talkin' about.
    drive less - RIDE MORE!
  • Cob
    Cob Posts: 858
    dirt wrote:
    Not only is it a good album, but if any of you still care about great audio quality, this is one of the better rock recordings of the past forty years. Listen to it on a stereo system that has good power and you'll hear what I'm talkin' about.


    I can only assume you are talking about the record and not the CD.
    [img][/img]9/5/92, 11/20/93, 3/14,15/94, 9/16/95, 10/14,15/2000
    4/5,6/9/2003, 9/1/05, 12/7/2005, 7/15,16,18/2006, 8/5/2007
    6/24,25/08,6/27/08,6/28/08,6/30/08
    9/21,22/2009, 10/4/2009
    5/6,7,9/2010, 9/3/2011 9/4/2011, 11/15/2013,
    11/16/2013, 12/8/2013, 10/5/2014, 10/12/2014,
    4/23, 5/10, 5/12, 8/20, 8/22 2016,
    8/8, 8/10, 8/18, 8/20 2018, 5/12, 5/13, 9/20 2022



  • dirt
    dirt Posts: 398
    Cob wrote:
    I can only assume you are talking about the record and not the CD.
    Yes!
    drive less - RIDE MORE!
  • The Final Cut is probably the finest Roger Waters album but, not a great Pink Floyd album. I maybe wrong but, Micheal Kamen had more input on this album than David Gilmour and of course, Richard Wright was already out of the band.

    A good album, yes. A Pink Floyd album, no.
  • Fletcher was Roger Water's father's middle name. Just a bit of trivia.