what's wrong with housing gitmo suspects in the US?

CommyCommy Posts: 4,984
edited May 2009 in A Moving Train
AS Jon Stewert put it, "these guys aren't warlocks".


they're just people. we house guys much, much worse than these terror "suspects".


what's wrong with building a prison, giving them fair trials, and ending all of this torture bullshit?
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    its like the nuclear power plant syndrome "not in my backyard"

    but I dont get it either. put them in some supermax prison and give them a trial.
  • g under pg under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
    jlew24asu wrote:
    its like the nuclear power plant syndrome "not in my backyard"

    but I dont get it either. put them in some supermax prison and give them a trial.

    ...And be done with them one way or another. Find out who did what or if they did nothing at all but this on going scenario is ridiculous.

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    Send them to Rikers Island... or Pelican Bay... or San Quentin and make them bunk with Charles Manson.
    We've got some hard ass, hard core, tatted up gang member killers and some real psychos in our prisons. Let them spend their time with those guys and waterborading will seem like a day at the water slide park.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    Cosmo wrote:
    Send them to Rikers Island... or Pelican Bay... or San Quentin and make them bunk with Charles Manson.
    We've got some hard ass, hard core, tatted up gang member killers and some real psychos in our prisons. Let them spend their time with those guys and waterborading will seem like a day at the water slide park.

    No shit. The republicans act like it'd be terrifyingly dangerous to have these guys in our prisons. You've got to be joking. These guys are tame compared to some of our inmates. And they're going to get FUCKED up in an American prison... I actually don't see many of them surviving to trial inside. We have far more dangerous people free in our neighborhoods than these yahoos.
  • blackredyellowblackredyellow Posts: 5,889
    Yeah, if these guys got put in general population, you know the white supremacists or or some backwoods redneck named Bubba is going to fuck these guys up.

    I don't see the big deal with putting them in our prison system either.
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    Cosmo wrote:
    Send them to Rikers Island... or Pelican Bay... or San Quentin and make them bunk with Charles Manson.
    We've got some hard ass, hard core, tatted up gang member killers and some real psychos in our prisons. Let them spend their time with those guys and waterborading will seem like a day at the water slide park.

    No shit. The republicans act like it'd be terrifyingly dangerous to have these guys in our prisons. You've got to be joking. These guys are tame compared to some of our inmates. And they're going to get FUCKED up in an American prison... I actually don't see many of them surviving to trial inside. We have far more dangerous people free in our neighborhoods than these yahoos.
    ...
    I know... I hear all this, "Not in my West Virgina" and "Not in my Nebraska" bullshit from these pussy politicians and I say, "Fuck you, you pussy and fuck your fucking pussy state!!! Bring 'em to fucking California and drop them off in Pelican Bay with fucking gang hardened killers who are the worst convicts in the prisons who are too fucking violent to be in regular prison.".
    There are guys who have eaten people in our prisons!!! Guys who can make a fucking Samurai sword from a Dixie cup, some thread and a paper clip and slice open your carotid artery!!! We already HAVE a bunch of fucking scary people in our prisons... a lot scarier than that fat-ass Sheik Belushi dude.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • South of SeattleSouth of Seattle West Seattle Posts: 10,724
    Nothing is wrong with it. I agree with everyone so far.
    NERDS!
  • People need to get all upset because the president has been doing a good job and they can't think of anything else to bitch about.
  • mca47mca47 Posts: 13,300
    There are already "terrorists" locked up in US prisons. They aren't f'n going anywhere so who the fuck cares?!?!
  • WaveCameCrashinWaveCameCrashin Posts: 2,929
    Cosmo wrote:
    Send them to Rikers Island... or Pelican Bay... or San Quentin and make them bunk with Charles Manson.
    We've got some hard ass, hard core, tatted up gang member killers and some real psychos in our prisons. Let them spend their time with those guys and waterborading will seem like a day at the water slide park.

    :lol::lol::lol: That would make a great episode of lock down or whatever that show is called that comes on MSNBC. Could you Imagine ?
  • keeponrockinkeeponrockin Posts: 7,446
    Did anyone see Stewart own the fox news lady? Something about 'You just made an argument against imprisioning anybody!'
    Believe me, when I was growin up, I thought the worst thing you could turn out to be was normal, So I say freaks in the most complementary way. Here's a song by a fellow freak - E.V
  • ajedigeckoajedigecko \m/deplorable af \m/ Posts: 2,430
    this topic sucks because............................................we all agree.
    live and let live...unless it violates the pearligious doctrine.
  • WildsWilds Posts: 4,329
    ajedigecko wrote:
    this topic sucks because............................................we all agree.

    +1 :D
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    Ron White's take on why we shouldn't execute Osama Bin Laden (and equally relevant to why it's ridiculous to think terror suspects will somehow be a threat in our prisons):

    ""Osama bin Laden is spiritually prepared to die for Islam. But he is spiritually ill-prepared to lick grape jelly from Thunder Dick's asshole."
  • CommyCommy Posts: 4,984
    ajedigecko wrote:
    this topic sucks because............................................we all agree.
    yeah. it does.

    all the congress idiots are saying "not in my backyard" etc,thought i could get a few takers.
  • mca47mca47 Posts: 13,300
    Did anyone see Stewart own the fox news lady? Something about 'You just made an argument against imprisioning anybody!'


    Hahahaha, yeah, I saw that.

    Love me some Daily Show!
  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    suspects??? after all this time is that what they still are???
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • AnonAnon Posts: 11,175
    They are already locked up. Why not just have more oversight and leave them where they are? Then the taxpayers won't have to pay the added expense of moving them, again.
  • WaveCameCrashinWaveCameCrashin Posts: 2,929
    JB811 wrote:
    They are already locked up. Why not just have more oversight and leave them where they are? Then the taxpayers won't have to pay the added expense of moving them, again.

    Maybe... But I doubt it cos it would cost more to keep Gitmo running then it would to just put them in that super Max that Barry mentioned during his last press conference. I think it's in Colorado.They do need to be tried and convicted so when can move on IMO
  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    edited May 2009
    heres the thing people... guantanamo bay is in a foreign country. right now the united states of america is hostile to THAT country. i do not think that an agreement between a suckarse government and an imperial power should be binding beyond the government that made said agreement. therefore, in my opinion the united states of america has absolutely no right to house its prisoners on cuban soil, let alone continue to maintain a base on said soil.
    Post edited by catefrances on
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    anyone see this?

    http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/0 ... detainees/

    Montana town offers to take Gitmo detainees.

    Hardin, Montana - a very small, very poor town with a very new, very empty jail, is willing to take on the responsibility of holding Gitmo detainees:

    Hardin borrowed $27 million through bonds to build the Two Rivers Regional Correctional Facility in hopes of creating new employment opportunities. The jail was ready for prisoners two years ago, but has yet to house a single prisoner.

    People here say politics in the capital of Helena has kept it empty. But the city council last month voted 5-0 to back a proposal to bring Gitmo detainees — some of the most hardened terrorists in the world — to the facility.

    Montanan Senators (both of whom are Democrats) wet themselves in response:

    The state’s congressional leaders have lined up against the plan. “Housing potential terrorists in Montana is not good for our state,” Max Baucus, the state’s senior Democratic senator, wrote to [economic development director Greg Smith]. “These people stop at nothing. Their primary goal in life, and death, is to destroy America.”

    Adds Sen. Jon Tester, “I just don’t think it’s appropriate, that’s all. I don’t think they know what they’re asking for.”

    Of course, they know what they’re asking for. They’re asking for the state government to cough up some regular prisoners to house at Hardin so that the town could generate some revenue and maybe pay off its bond. Failing that, they’re advertising - and if you don’t think that there’s money in prison facilities, go talk to the hardcore Left: they have a bee in their bonnet on the subject, as a Google search of the phrase “prison industry” will quickly determine.

    Of course, the same groups are busily trumpeting out their support of Hardin, MT without quite realizing that the town is mostly trying to get the word out that they can service a contract to incarcerate a few hundred drug dealers and car thieves - not to mention embarrass its Democratic governor and Senators. At least, that’s why I assume this bit at the end:

    Smith voices disdain for members of Congress who supported closing Guantanamo but now oppose putting its prisoners in the U.S.

    “All of the senators are running for the hills, and all of the representatives. So we really are nowhere except we’ve got a town that says, ‘We have the place and we have the will.’ “

    Well played, Mr. Smith. Well played.
  • slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,762
    Cosmo wrote:
    Send them to Rikers Island... or Pelican Bay... or San Quentin and make them bunk with Charles Manson.
    We've got some hard ass, hard core, tatted up gang member killers and some real psychos in our prisons. Let them spend their time with those guys and waterborading will seem like a day at the water slide park.

    No shit. The republicans act like it'd be terrifyingly dangerous to have these guys in our prisons. You've got to be joking. These guys are tame compared to some of our inmates. And they're going to get FUCKED up in an American prison... I actually don't see many of them surviving to trial inside. We have far more dangerous people free in our neighborhoods than these yahoos.

    And yet, we're against waterboarding ...
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • RiverrunnerRiverrunner Posts: 2,419
    I don't get it. What are the reasons the politicians are giving for not housing them in U.S. prisons? The only thing I can think of is that they think a group of terrorists will attack the prison to free them. But I haven't heard anybody say that. It seems downright silly to me to say it is too dangerous to house them here. Like others have said, I can't see that Islamic terrorists are worse than some of the other U.S. prisoners.
    The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way it treats its animals. Ghandi
  • slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,762
    I think what most people are against are trying them in U.S. courts ... in a way, we don't trust our own justice system.

    So long as they are still at Gitmo, it's easy to see them as enemy combatants and to try them using military tribunals. Which is what I think the powers-that-be ultimately want.
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • RiverrunnerRiverrunner Posts: 2,419
    I think what most people are against are trying them in U.S. courts ... in a way, we don't trust our own justice system.

    So long as they are still at Gitmo, it's easy to see them as enemy combatants and to try them using military tribunals. Which is what I think the powers-that-be ultimately want.

    Good point.
    The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way it treats its animals. Ghandi
  • FlaggFlagg Posts: 5,856
    Commy wrote:
    AS Jon Stewert put it, "these guys aren't warlocks".


    they're just people. we house guys much, much worse than these terror "suspects".


    what's wrong with building a prison, giving them fair trials, and ending all of this torture bullshit?

    Nothing. As Obama and others have noted, no one has ever escaped from one of our supermax facilities in the US. Just give them trials and if found guilty off they go.
    DAL-7/5/98,10/17/00,6/9/03,11/15/13
    BOS-9/28/04,9/29/04,6/28/08,6/30/08, 9/5/16, 9/7/16, 9/2/18
    MTL-9/15/05, OTT-9/16/05
    PHL-5/27/06,5/28/06,10/30/09,10/31/09
    CHI-8/2/07,8/5/07,8/23/09,8/24/09
    HTFD-6/27/08
    ATX-10/4/09, 10/12/14
    KC-5/3/2010,STL-5/4/2010
    Bridge School-10/23/2010,10/24/2010
    PJ20-9/3/2011,9/4/2011
    OKC-11/16/13
    SEA-12/6/13
    TUL-10/8/14
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    Cosmo wrote:
    Send them to Rikers Island... or Pelican Bay... or San Quentin and make them bunk with Charles Manson.
    We've got some hard ass, hard core, tatted up gang member killers and some real psychos in our prisons. Let them spend their time with those guys and waterborading will seem like a day at the water slide park.

    No shit. The republicans act like it'd be terrifyingly dangerous to have these guys in our prisons. You've got to be joking. These guys are tame compared to some of our inmates. And they're going to get FUCKED up in an American prison... I actually don't see many of them surviving to trial inside. We have far more dangerous people free in our neighborhoods than these yahoos.

    And yet, we're against waterboarding ...

    Clean hands my man. I don't like our government cold-bloodedly and calculatingly torturing people. It's a power too dangerous to give them the opportunity to abuse. But you lock them up, that's fair. And what happens to them inside... well, if it's good enough for our own citizens, it's good enough for the terrorists.
Sign In or Register to comment.