Home› A Moving Train

Leaked 1955 Bilderberg Docs: Plan For Single Euro Currency

DriftingByTheStormDriftingByTheStorm Posts: 8,684
edited May 2009 in A Moving Train
For all you goobers that continue to play down Bilderberg's influence, and to arrogantly purport that it is merely a "meet and greet" seminar or even worse, just a golf club, here is your moment of zen.

Leaked 1955 Bilderberg Docs Outline Plan For Single European Currency

Not only DO they help to shape short term and specific business strategies, they are heavily involved in long term, broad range, high level POLITICAL POLICY.

This is from 1955 folks.
HOW MANY YEARS IN ADVANCE DOES THIS SHOW "THEY" PLAN THINGS OUT?
???

Come on.
Give me SOMETHING here, folks.

From the linked "internal document"
[go to the url above, click on the image, and type in the password provided to see it your self]
A Speaker From Europe Said wrote:
"A European speaker expressed concern about the need to achieve a common currency, and indicated that in his view this necessarily implied the creation of a central political authority."

I like how even in their own fucking internal documents they accord each other with anonymity.

Not to start shit, but from the article:
Paul Watson wrote:
Indeed, the sheer stupidity of debunkers to suggest that an event that attracts the titans of government, industry, banking, business and academia, at which the most pressing global issues of the day are vigorously discussed under the cloak of a mutually agreed media blackout, has no bearing on future world events, is the most laughable “conspiracy theory” ever uttered.

If you seriously still refuse to consider the ramifications of Bilderberg, you should actually read that document.
It is essentially the secretary notes for 1955, and it is a HUGE LAUNDRY LIST OF DISCUSSION ITEMS on everything from The Marshall Plan to international trade, to the re-unification of Germany for fucks sake.

THIS IS NOT A GODDAMN TEA PARTY, PEOPLE.

Here are two other choice nuggets from summary section near the bottom that should give you cause for pause:
Leaked Documents wrote:
"Disagreement was, as a rule, largely a matter of emphasis."

and then a sentence or two below, adding to this notion of agreement between the elite, and on the topic of the extreme clandestine nature of their conference:

"Participants in this conference may, in the light of the consensus of opinion expressed during the discussions, and to some extent summarized in this document, be able to pass these views on to public opinion in their own spheres of influence, without disclosing their source."

In other words, GO GET IT IN TO THE MEDIA AND BODY POLITIC IN YOUR COUNTRY, JUST DON'T TELL THEM IT CAME FROM BILDERBERG, FOR JAHBULON'S SAKE!
If I was to smile and I held out my hand
If I opened it now would you not understand?
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • DriftingByTheStormDriftingByTheStorm Posts: 8,684
    Now, from the very bottom of that document,
    and from a section entitled "PRESS RELEASE"

    here is more proof that they clearly seek to CONCEAL THE TRUE NATURE OF THEIR DISCUSSIONS:
    Bilderberg Press Release wrote:
    "The objective was to promote by free discussion a closer understanding between individuals whose countries share a deep desire for peace and for human freedom. It was not he purpose to reach decisions or to establish policy."

    OH REALLY?

    Suggesting a European Union, or "the creation of a central political authority" along with talks about trade imbalances with The Soviet Bloc qualifies as promiting "free discussion [and] a closer understanding [...] for peace and for human freedom" ????

    "NOT [...] TO REACH DECISSIONS OR ESTABLISH POLICY" !?!?!?!
    Here. LET ME SPELL IT OUT FOR YOU.
    Same Goddamn Bilderberg Document from 1955 wrote:
    "The oil import problem was also controversial. The Committee on Fuel Resources had recommended, in order adequately to spur domestic development, that it was necessary to have a policy for the sharing of the market."

    First:
    A COMMITTEE ON FUEL RESOURCES?

    WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH PEACE AND HUMAN FREEDOM?

    Second:
    "RECOMMENDED", and "NECESSARY TO HAVE A POLICY"
    SURE SOUNDS A FUCK-LOT LIKE "SETTING POLICY" and "REACHING DECISIONS"
    DOES IT NOT?
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • CommyCommy Posts: 4,984
    yeah., that is a bit scary. i've always wondered about the bilderberg group.


    why go to all the trouble and assemble the most influential people in the world, shroud everything in secrecy, and have all these closed doors meetings? their excuse /explanation was -how can we implement policy when we can barely plan this meeting? sure.


    of course they are up to something.


    the one currency is a bit of an eye opener. from zeitgeist, any fractional reserve banking policies regarding currencies is basically a way to implement wage slavery. we're forever working off a growing debt, that can never be repaid. over time our share becomes smaller, through inflation, while theirs increases-through default. they said that if all debts in the world were paid off there would be no currency. and if you think about fractional reserve banking that shit makes sense.


    if your goal is control and power-having more people affected by a single currency makes sense as well. they can affect ALL of europe now by affecting the value of the Euro-, as opposed to having to deal with each individual currency. it may be good now, in terms of its value, but down the road, and with fractional reserve banking, its only going to inflate over time, its inherent in the goddamn system. it guaranteed to devalue over time. so we get less they get more.

    I blame capitalism and greed. we need to structure a system that accounts for human greed and selfishness, take away that motivation completely.


    and they should be careful in Europe. those fuckers have brought down governments in the past, many times. if it gets too bad they'll scrap the enitire system and come up with something a little more worker friendly, probably something with a socialist slant-its already naturally leaning that direction. its the next step in social evolution.
  • John Briggs 2008John Briggs 2008 Posts: 1,024
    Well, I am not here to debunk but where is the proof of authenticity regarding this document? If that exists then right on. Other wise this is and will be easily dismissed. No chore at all for a disinformation agent at that anyways.
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    why is having a single currency in Europe a big deal...?

    the goober in me thinks the Euro makes sense...
  • Sludge FactorySludge Factory Posts: 976
    inmytree wrote:
    why is having a single currency in Europe a big deal...?

    the goober in me thinks the Euro makes sense...

    I think maybe Commy summed it up:
    Commy wrote:
    if your goal is control and power-having more people affected by a single currency makes sense as well. they can affect ALL of europe now by affecting the value of the Euro-, as opposed to having to deal with each individual currency. it may be good now, in terms of its value, but down the road, and with fractional reserve banking, its only going to inflate over time, its inherent in the goddamn system. it guaranteed to devalue over time. so we get less they get more.
Sign In or Register to comment.