I think Obama

Abuskedti
Abuskedti Posts: 1,917
edited May 2009 in A Moving Train
is the real deal
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • Anon
    Anon Posts: 11,175
    Was that a question or are we supposed to complete a sentence?

    ...is done in four, while setting us back twenty.
  • megatron
    megatron Posts: 3,420
    JB811 wrote:
    Was that a question or are we supposed to complete a sentence?

    ...is done in four, while setting us back twenty.
    :lol: where did u get that avatar pic?
  • Prince Of Dorkness
    Prince Of Dorkness Posts: 3,763
    I'm pretty impressed so far.

    When the biggest complaints that they throw at him include giving an iPod to the Queen and his wife's arms... he's doing something VERY right.
    I can't drive without Pearl Jam
  • DriftingByTheStorm
    DriftingByTheStorm Posts: 8,684
    Abuskedti wrote:
    is the real deal

    But i thought he said on the campaign trail that he WASN'T a card carying CFR member?
    ;)
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • inmytree
    inmytree Posts: 4,741
    Jasunmark wrote:
    I'm pretty impressed so far.

    When the biggest complaints that they throw at him include giving an iPod to the Queen and his wife's arms... he's doing something VERY right.

    don't forget the latest wingut uproar....

    Spicy DIJON MUSTARD...

    this will set us back 20 years... :lol:
  • Anon
    Anon Posts: 11,175
    The twenty years is speaking about the pork filled bailout spending he and his puppeteers like Pelosi are creating.
  • Anon
    Anon Posts: 11,175
    RACE THAT CANT BE WON wrote:
    JB811 wrote:
    Was that a question or are we supposed to complete a sentence?

    ...is done in four, while setting us back twenty.
    :lol: where did u get that avatar pic?


    A friend created it.
  • WaveCameCrashin
    WaveCameCrashin Posts: 2,929
    edited May 2009
    Is Full of shit...
    Post edited by WaveCameCrashin on
  • Commy
    Commy Posts: 4,984
    is just like all the others with a bit more common sense,

    which could have an impact on policy. like adhering to international law. that could have opened up a can of shit. other countries start violating international law-hey we're the world leader right? if we can do it they can to. pretty soon its common practice around the world...might as well bring back the spanish inquisition yeah? that wonderful time.

    he made the right call, to at least pretend to adhere to international law. it ensures others will do the same. we're still shipping off rendition victims to poland to have them do the dirty work (all you bloodlust pro-torture douchebags shouldn't be too upset about any of it, we still get to torture, yay).

    but what he did was send a message. the us does not support torture (even though we still do) the US adheres to international law (even though some of our allies do not). still the right message. adhering to international law, at least on the surface, very important. it could mean some country who steps out of line down the road doesn't decide it want sto start torturing as well. some good came of that policy.


    lot to be said for common sense.
  • WaveCameCrashin
    WaveCameCrashin Posts: 2,929
    Commy wrote:
    is just like all the others with a bit more common sense,

    which could have an impact on policy. like adhering to international law. that could have opened up a can of shit. other countries start violating international law-hey we're the world leader right? if we can do it they can to. pretty soon its common practice around the world...might as well bring back the spanish inquisition yeah? that wonderful time.

    he made the right call, to at least pretend to adhere to international law. it ensures others will do the same. we're still shipping off rendition victims to poland to have them do the dirty work (all you bloodlust pro-torture douchebags shouldn't be too upset about any of it, we still get to torture, yay).

    but what he did was send a message. the us does not support torture (even though we still do) the US adheres to international law (even though some of our allies do not). still the right message. adhering to international law, at least on the surface, very important. it could mean some country who steps out of line down the road doesn't decide it want sto start torturing as well. some good came of that policy.


    lot to be said for common sense.
    :? :?
    Dont you mean commy sense ? :roll:
  • ledvedderman
    ledvedderman Posts: 7,762
    prfctlefts wrote:
    Commy wrote:
    is just like all the others with a bit more common sense,

    which could have an impact on policy. like adhering to international law. that could have opened up a can of shit. other countries start violating international law-hey we're the world leader right? if we can do it they can to. pretty soon its common practice around the world...might as well bring back the spanish inquisition yeah? that wonderful time.

    he made the right call, to at least pretend to adhere to international law. it ensures others will do the same. we're still shipping off rendition victims to poland to have them do the dirty work (all you bloodlust pro-torture douchebags shouldn't be too upset about any of it, we still get to torture, yay).

    but what he did was send a message. the us does not support torture (even though we still do) the US adheres to international law (even though some of our allies do not). still the right message. adhering to international law, at least on the surface, very important. it could mean some country who steps out of line down the road doesn't decide it want sto start torturing as well. some good came of that policy.


    lot to be said for common sense.
    :? :?
    Dont you mean commy sense ? :roll:

    Clever
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • ajedigecko
    ajedigecko \m/deplorable af \m/ Posts: 2,431
    should audit each person on his staff and each member of the federal government.
    live and let live...unless it violates the pearligious doctrine.
  • inmytree
    inmytree Posts: 4,741
    JB811 wrote:
    The twenty years is speaking about the pork filled bailout spending he and his puppeteers like Pelosi are creating.

    yeah, Gov't spending started on 11/5/08....not a minute before.... :lol: :roll: :lol:

    question: did you fall and bump your head on 11/4/08 when you realized McCain wasn't going to be our next commander and chief...? the reason I ask is you seem to have forgotten a few things....
  • inmytree
    inmytree Posts: 4,741
    ajedigecko wrote:
    should audit each person on his staff and each member of the federal government.

    what would that cost...? would you be ok with taxpayer dollars to paying for this task...? and what would these "audits" be looking for...?
  • ajedigecko
    ajedigecko \m/deplorable af \m/ Posts: 2,431
    inmytree wrote:
    ajedigecko wrote:
    should audit each person on his staff and each member of the federal government.

    what would that cost...? would you be ok with taxpayer dollars to paying for this task...? and what would these "audits" be looking for...?
    question 1. do not know.
    question 2.yes.

    question 3.the audits would give the leaders an opportunity to pay taxes.
    live and let live...unless it violates the pearligious doctrine.
  • inmytree
    inmytree Posts: 4,741
    ajedigecko wrote:
    inmytree wrote:
    ajedigecko wrote:
    should audit each person on his staff and each member of the federal government.

    what would that cost...? would you be ok with taxpayer dollars to paying for this task...? and what would these "audits" be looking for...?
    question 1. do not know.
    question 2.yes.

    question 3.the audits would give the leaders an opportunity to pay taxes.


    :lol:

Categories