What business model should the record industry follow?

musicismylife78musicismylife78 Posts: 6,116
edited April 2009 in Other Music
No matter how much sticklers whine, the days of the record store, and people paying for 20 dollar cd's is over. Those days are never coming back.

I have said many times, when Napster broke the whole thing open in 1999 the record labels had many responses they could have prepared. The wisest one would have been to have downloads be a monthly charge, like utilities or the tv or phone bill. They could have sent out bills monthly, say, unlimited downloading for 10-20 bucks a month. Instead they started going after fans who downloaded, the fans who had collectively spent billions of dollars yearly buying their label rosters cd's.

So the question is, as the record industry no longer exists, what is the best business model the labels could come up with now?

Whats the smartest one?

Seems to me, there are bands that are already embracing the new times, Radiohead obviously. But Trent Reznor seems to be light years ahead of even them, or anyone in the music world in terms of what he envisions as a new industry of music. And it seems to me, what the future of the music industry will be, will most likely be seen and created by Trent
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • CobCob Posts: 858
    I think the days of record companies as a whole are numbered, and I'm not shedding any tears, they RIPPED OFF bands and artists to no end. They've made tons of money by releasing LP's, cassette's, 8 tracks, reel to reel, re issued Lp's, re issued CD's, they've made their money, they don't promote bands anymore and are an overall complete waste of time to most bands and artist. It's not like it was in the 60's, 70's and 80's, a band would release a record, the label would promote it, get it out to radio stations, send out press kits and releases and promote the band so they could sell records. What was BS about all of this that most people don't know, is that the labels would keep a majority of every dollar spent on each record sold.

    It took bands a while to figure out the real way to make money is to tour, Grateful Dead toured from 80 to 87 without ever releasing a studio album. So now it's 2009 and most bands in this day and age of technology just release their music direct from their website to download, I still like Lp's and Cd's and a lot of bands also offer those direct. The days of bands being signed by a record label are almost a thing of the past, bands find it more rewarding to try and strike out on their own without some label ripping them off, not promoting them properly or dropping them like a safe for the next "big thing" I for one am not nostalgic enough about the record labels and think they are getting what they have deserved for a long time now! The record industry should have been thinking about their business model 10 to 12 years ago, the ship has left the port already and it ain't coming back!
    [img][/img]9/5/92, 11/20/93, 3/14,15/94, 9/16/95, 10/14,15/2000
    4/5,6/9/2003, 9/1/05, 12/7/2005, 7/15,16,18/2006, 8/5/2007
    6/24,25/08,6/27/08,6/28/08,6/30/08
    9/21,22/2009, 10/4/2009
    5/6,7,9/2010, 9/3/2011 9/4/2011, 11/15/2013,
    11/16/2013, 12/8/2013, 10/5/2014, 10/12/2014,
    4/23, 5/10, 5/12, 8/20, 8/22 2016,
    8/8, 8/10, 8/18, 8/20 2018, 5/12, 5/13, 9/20 2022



  • allmyrivalsallmyrivals Posts: 228
    You guys should check out Bob Lefsetz . He has a major grasp on whats going on in the industry. Go to his site and View the Archive. Read and be enlightened ! It's always a good read. And while your there make sure to sign up for his emails (lefsetz letters)

    http://lefsetz.com/wordpress/





    allmyrivals
    EVENFLOW PSYCHO #0031
    WHAAHYEAH!!
  • cordurologycordurology Posts: 227
    I have said many times, when Napster broke the whole thing open in 1999 the record labels had many responses they could have prepared. The wisest one would have been to have downloads be a monthly charge, like utilities or the tv or phone bill. They could have sent out bills monthly, say, unlimited downloading for 10-20 bucks a month.

    Same thing is killing (or has killed, depending on your view) the newspaper industry. If newspapers had started charging a small fee for their online publications from the get-go, hardly anyone would have complained. The mindset would have been, okay.. I can either pay for the paper version and have it delivered or go pick it up somewhere, or I can pay a similar (perhaps cheaper) fee to read the same paper online. But the papers didn't do this, obviously, and a decade later there's certainly no turning back. RIP, newspapers. Record industry is next.
    Lex 03, Gorge 05, Cincy 06
  • PJRock75PJRock75 Posts: 869
    Trent reznor has a great opinion on this very topic. Check out his interview on digg.com
    "If you want a friend, feed any animal." - JA
    "Don't let it get you down, you know, still give your love, just give it away...I love singin' that part." - EV
  • mookeywrenchmookeywrench Posts: 5,955
    record companies can continue to release music in an unreplicable format, such as Vinyl and shift their focus to arranging and setting up live touring so bands will have to raise ticket prices in order to recoupe payment to the record company. And if you get caught down/uploading music without the band's/lable's consent for distribution, then you should be fined/prosecuted for doing so. You're violating copyright laws.

    It;s just like a speeding, just because you can do it and can get away with it most of the time, it doesn't mean that your invincable from the law.
    350x700px-LL-d2f49cb4_vinyl-needle-scu-e1356666258495.jpeg
  • keeponrockinkeeponrockin Posts: 7,446
    Call me oldschool (even though I'm 18), but I still don't like the idea of downloading songs for free. I like BUYING the CD, having the artwork... The 'digital booklets' on iTunes isn't the same.

    Arts and Crafts has a good scene going now, but I still think people SHOULD buy CDs...
    Believe me, when I was growin up, I thought the worst thing you could turn out to be was normal, So I say freaks in the most complementary way. Here's a song by a fellow freak - E.V
  • CommyCommy Posts: 4,984
    agreed keeponrockin.


    there's something about the artwork and feel of a released album that can't be matched with a digital release.

    itunes is convenient and makes everything easier but I think you lose something in the process.

    like how a bootleg or a video from a show in can't match the atmosphere or vibe of actually being at the show. its not that extreme, but still. there's a lot to be said for having something physical in your hands when you first sit down to listen to a new album. its all art, an expression of the band, for me its all good. I love all of that. its nothing a digital release can match, even if they release all of that when you buy the album online. its just not the same.

    guess i'm old school but that's how i see it.


    ideally the business model should completely cut out the record industry. big bands like pearl jam should be funding the smaller bands and helping them release their music. they fund it, the bands keep the profits, after costs are covered. completely organic. no capitalists involved.


    or we can continue on this path and let the record execs DECIDE what we get to hear.
  • JohnBriggsJohnBriggs Posts: 101
    I think the Music Industry needs to embrace the online market as about 80% of it's business and reexamine the costs and how they are treating there artists on there labels. Costs need to come down. People will buy cds if the costs go down and artists and labels alike can make a profit without raping each other.
  • Thoughts_ArriveThoughts_Arrive Melbourne, Australia Posts: 15,165
    I think they should just let artists do what they want.
    Adelaide 17/11/2009, Melbourne 20/11/2009, Sydney 22/11/2009, Melbourne (Big Day Out Festival) 24/01/2014
Sign In or Register to comment.