Gibson Es-137 Vs. Firebird V
Kegzy05
Posts: 93
Hey guys,
Very very long time since I have posted but hope you are all well.
I will be getting a new guitar in the near future and I am having trouble deciding. Ultimately I am going to have to go in to a music shop and try them out anyway but I was wondering what your thoughts were on the Gibson ES-137 and the Gibson Firebird V which are the main two i have been looking at.
I am currently in a cover band that does mainly classic rock (60's to 80's), with a bit of newer stuff thrown in but at home I also enjoy playing alot of Pearl jam, Foo Fighters and assorted other hard rock. So I guess I want something pretty versatile. Im trying to steer away from a les paul but im just worried that the es137 wont be able to cut it with the harder rock like pearl jam, and the firebird wont be able to give me as good a classic rock tone.
Appreciate all comments and other guitar suggestions :-) Thanks!
Very very long time since I have posted but hope you are all well.
I will be getting a new guitar in the near future and I am having trouble deciding. Ultimately I am going to have to go in to a music shop and try them out anyway but I was wondering what your thoughts were on the Gibson ES-137 and the Gibson Firebird V which are the main two i have been looking at.
I am currently in a cover band that does mainly classic rock (60's to 80's), with a bit of newer stuff thrown in but at home I also enjoy playing alot of Pearl jam, Foo Fighters and assorted other hard rock. So I guess I want something pretty versatile. Im trying to steer away from a les paul but im just worried that the es137 wont be able to cut it with the harder rock like pearl jam, and the firebird wont be able to give me as good a classic rock tone.
Appreciate all comments and other guitar suggestions :-) Thanks!
"I dont question, our existence
I just question, our modern needs"
I just question, our modern needs"
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
Also, I would check out the es339's. It's a Gibson hollowbody, the size of a Les Paul.
That said, I'd personally go for the Firebird, and I don't think it would have any trouble doing classic-rock duty.
http://reviews.harmony-central.com/revi ... ird+V/10/1
http://reviews.harmony-central.com/revi ... assic/10/1
http://reviews.harmony-central.com/revi ... +Neck/10/1
(there are other reviews for other versions of the ES-339, but that one had the most reviews listed.... I still haven't held a 30/60 Gibson neck, but I'm eager to try one out)
Another thing I just came across but was a video demo on youtube of the 137 and one thing that the guy mentioned was that its quite difficult get up past the 15th fret and do lead work around there. Perhaps this would be a guitar more suited to rhythm?
To be honest im more and more coming back to the idea of a les paul classic but i was sort of hoping for something different.
And when i think rock guitar, i think gibson, and im too stupid to try other guitars. Im sure there are lots of awesome guitars from different brands.
I just question, our modern needs"
That said, there's nothing wrong with a Gibson, except maybe their prices in the last 10-15 years...
The 137 is a slightly deeper guitar, and combined with that funky florentine cutaway, it's not exactly easy access to those upper frets. The Firebird or Les Paul will be much friendlier in that respect, being thinner solid-bodies with more open cutaways. But I still think you would enjoy an ES-339. The design just seems to fit what you've stated you're looking for: A more comfortable, smaller, easier to play semi-hollow. It's got the iconic 335 body shape, which should make easier access to those higher frets. And it's built to be a classic rock monster!