Selanne agrees to terms with Ducks

kenshuntkenshunt Posts: 2,863
edited January 2008 in All Encompassing Trip
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=228393&hubname=

This pisses me off that 2 Anaheim Ducks decide to take half a season off, and force Burke to make stupid trades like Andy McDonald for Doug Weight, just to make cap room for players who shoulda decided along time ago whether they were playing hockey this year or not.
London 2005
Toronto 2011 night 2
Hamilton 2011
London 2013
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • that's quackers!







    yeah. i said it.
    Jam out with your clam out.
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    Fuck The Ducks!!!!!!
  • JOEJOEJOEJOEJOEJOE Posts: 10,513
    kenshunt wrote:
    http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=228393&hubname=

    This pisses me off that 2 Anaheim Ducks decide to take half a season off, and force Burke to make stupid trades like Andy McDonald for Doug Weight, just to make cap room for players who shoulda decided along time ago whether they were playing hockey this year or not.

    He will be well-rested for the play-offs!
  • HawkshoreHawkshore Posts: 2,155
    Great :rolleyes: Ducks are going to be very tough in the playoff again! :mad:

    It will probably take him a while to get his timing and conditioning back to where it needs to be .......but there’s enough time before the playoffs start for him.
    Van 92.07.21 / Van 98.07.19 / Sea 98.07.22 / Tor 98.08.22 / Sea 00.11.06 / Van 03.05.30/ Van 05.09.02/ Gorge 06.07.22 & 23 / EV Van 08.04.02 / Tor 09.08.21 / Sea 09.09.21 & 22 / Van 09.09.25 / Van 11.09.25 / Van 13.12.04 / Pem 16.07.17 / Sea 18.08.10
  • uninnocentuninnocent Posts: 1,565
    quack~!!!

    i'm happy. only because selanne is my favourite player (ever), and i selfishly didn't want him to retire. good luck all you west coast teams now.
  • TrailerTrailer Posts: 1,431
    well I'm not that big of a hockey fan, but I watched it the other night in HD and that shit was AWESOME!! You can actually see the puck now.. without that lame red trail they use to have
    Whoa, chill bro... you know you can't raise your voice like that when the lion's here.
  • uninnocentuninnocent Posts: 1,565
    Trailer wrote:
    well I'm not that big of a hockey fan, but I watched it the other night in HD and that shit was AWESOME!! You can actually see the puck now.. without that lame red trail they use to have

    heh, stupid foxtrax. thankfully i never had to really deal with that crap.

    just picked up selanne in one of my fantasy leagues. go me~!
  • kenshuntkenshunt Posts: 2,863
    Trailer wrote:
    well I'm not that big of a hockey fan, but I watched it the other night in HD and that shit was AWESOME!! You can actually see the puck now.. without that lame red trail they use to have
    That was the worst invention ever, i couldn't follow the puck with like a tail of red coming off the puck lol.
    London 2005
    Toronto 2011 night 2
    Hamilton 2011
    London 2013
  • SongburstSongburst Posts: 1,195
    Trailer wrote:
    well I'm not that big of a hockey fan, but I watched it the other night in HD and that shit was AWESOME!! You can actually see the puck now.. without that lame red trail they use to have

    The key to watching hockey is to not watch the puck but to watch the guy who has it and to know where it is going. The actual puck itself doesn't matter -- it doesn't do anything spectacular.
    1/12/1879, 4/8/1156, 2/6/1977, who gives a shit, ...
  • kenshuntkenshunt Posts: 2,863
    Songburst wrote:
    The key to watching hockey is to not watch the puck but to watch the guy who has it and to know where it is going. The actual puck itself doesn't matter -- it doesn't do anything spectacular.
    The puck did do some crazy shit when fox had that glowing puck, your eyes were glued to the puck.
    London 2005
    Toronto 2011 night 2
    Hamilton 2011
    London 2013
  • back to back, baby.

    woot!!!
  • smarcheesmarchee Posts: 14,539
    I have a feeling this is going to be addressed somewhat in the next collective bargaining agreement, in that, players who don't play by a specific date won't be allowed to sign with that team for the remainder of the season.

    I believe they used to have a similar clause when a player held-out of their contract past a certain date

    EDIT: oh, and I hate that fucking franchise, so fuck them, and fuck Selanne

    2008 Stanley Cup Champions ============== Detroit Red Wings !!! :D:D:D
    1998 ~ Barrie
    2003 ~ Toronto
    2005 ~ London, Toronto
    2006 ~ Toronto
    2008 ~ Hartford, Mansfied I,
    2009 ~ Toronto, Chicago I, Chicago II
    2010 ~ Cleveland, Buffalo
    2011 ~ Toronto I, Toronto II, Ottawa, Hamilton
    2013 - London, Pittsburgh, Buffalo
    2014 - Detroit
    2019 - Chicago X 2
  • smarchee wrote:
    I have a feeling this is going to be addressed somewhat in the next collective bargaining agreement, in that, players who don't play by a specific date won't be allowed to sign with that team for the remainder of the season.

    I believe they used to have a similar clause when a player held-out of their contract past a certain date

    EDIT: oh, and I hate that fucking franchise, so fuck them, and fuck Selanne


    yeah they already said theyre going to try to put it into THIS CBA for next season, a drop dead date, where if a player doesnt decide top play by a certain day they cant play
    {if (work != 0) {
    work = work + 1;
    sleep = sleep - work * 10;}
    else if (work >= 0) {
    reality.equals(false);
    work = work +1;
    }system("pause");
    return 0;}
  • SongburstSongburst Posts: 1,195
    smarchee wrote:

    2008 Stanley Cup Champions ============== Detroit Red Wings !!! :D:D:D

    Yawn.
    1/12/1879, 4/8/1156, 2/6/1977, who gives a shit, ...
  • restlesssoulrestlesssoul Posts: 6,951
    wow, shocking news. hope hes got the lungs..!
    Van '98, Sea I+II '00, Sea '01, Sea II '02, Van '03, Gorge, Van, Cal, Edm '05, Bos I+II, Phi I+II, DC, SF II+III, Port, Gorge I+II '06, DC, NY I+II '08, Sea I+II, Van, Ridge , LA III+IV' 09, Indy '10, Cal, Van '11, Lond, Van, Sea '13, Memphis '14, RRHOF '17, Sea I+II '18, Van I+II, Vegas I+II '24
  • restlesssoulrestlesssoul Posts: 6,951
    smarchee wrote:
    2008 Stanley Cup Champions ============== Detroit Red Wings !!! :D:D:D


    i may have to agree with this.
    Van '98, Sea I+II '00, Sea '01, Sea II '02, Van '03, Gorge, Van, Cal, Edm '05, Bos I+II, Phi I+II, DC, SF II+III, Port, Gorge I+II '06, DC, NY I+II '08, Sea I+II, Van, Ridge , LA III+IV' 09, Indy '10, Cal, Van '11, Lond, Van, Sea '13, Memphis '14, RRHOF '17, Sea I+II '18, Van I+II, Vegas I+II '24
  • smarcheesmarchee Posts: 14,539
    Songburst wrote:
    Yawn.

    you wanna watch some boring hockey ?

    take a trip down to St. Paul

    or maybe that's the kind of hockey you like, in which case that explains alot
    1998 ~ Barrie
    2003 ~ Toronto
    2005 ~ London, Toronto
    2006 ~ Toronto
    2008 ~ Hartford, Mansfied I,
    2009 ~ Toronto, Chicago I, Chicago II
    2010 ~ Cleveland, Buffalo
    2011 ~ Toronto I, Toronto II, Ottawa, Hamilton
    2013 - London, Pittsburgh, Buffalo
    2014 - Detroit
    2019 - Chicago X 2
  • SongburstSongburst Posts: 1,195
    smarchee wrote:
    you wanna watch some boring hockey ?

    take a trip down to St. Paul

    or maybe that's the kind of hockey you like, in which case that explains alot

    I have been to many Wild games and I almost agree, but there is no way in hell that the Wild are worse to watch than the Wings. Gaborik is the most exciting player in the NHL despite Jacques Lemaire.

    I actually watched the Wings and Sens this year despite my policy of never watching another Wings game. The Wings didn't change my mind on how painful it is to watch them play. They suck the flow right out of the game and play for powerplays -- it's horrible hockey. I will again continue to avoid watching them at all costs. It killed me to see Steve Yzerman there too. He was one of my favourite players in the NHL until Bowman showed up in Detroit and made him a boring "winner". Coaches like Bowman and Lemaire who stifle the stars at the expense of entertainment should be outlawed.
    1/12/1879, 4/8/1156, 2/6/1977, who gives a shit, ...
Sign In or Register to comment.