2007 New England Patriots

WhiteMaleRat

jimed14 wrote:

uh, you mean Merriman. no need to bring the Chargers into it. Your Norwood commet wans good enough.

LT = Lawrence Taylor

we're talkin Giants here.

NY PJ1

JSBE wrote:

really? you don't know what a homer is?

is it a combination of 6 states to make 1 football team?

Flannel Shirt

You want to hear how the Giants are going to beat the Patriots?

Trick play Z dragon ball niner red slash zingo on two.

I assume that since we are all in here giving shit back and forth we know something about football. Giants must stop the big play (moss), pressure Brady, and keep an eye on Welker. Sure, this leaves Faulk open, but make them earn it.

On offense, Giants must establish the run and keep the ball out of Patriots hands. Simple as that. Every drive must equal a score or a win in the field position battle.

Sure, the pats have mad weapons and they will be playing in ideal weather.

I honestly expect a very good game.

I hope the giants win, but I go into this with only the expectation of a classic superbowl. I may be wrong, I may be right. The definately have a better chance than most people are giving them. They are a good team.

jimed14

WhiteMaleRat wrote:

LT = Lawrence Taylor

we're talkin Giants here.

ahh ... ok ... shame on me for thinking LT is Tomlinson.

JSBE

Flannel Shirt wrote:

yes, you let the KICKER get the job done that the QB cannot.

exactly.

thank you.

a win is a win is a win. by 1 point or 3 points or 6 points i don't care as long as when the final whistle blows the pats have more points than the other team.

and yeah, football is a TEAM game. the qb dumps off passes to his rb or throws bombs down the field while the o-line blocks and then the kicker kicks the winning fg. didn't manning just do that to allow tynes to FINALLY convert on fg? hmmmm.

Flannel Shirt

jimed14 wrote:

ahh ... ok ... shame on me for thinking LT is Tomlinson.

yes. there is only one LT. Shame on you is correct, even though you both knew what you were doing, there is still only one LT.

jimed14

NY PJ1 wrote:

is it a combination of 6 states to make 1 football team?

The population of NY and NJ is twice that of New England.

Flannel Shirt

JSBE wrote:

a win is a win is a win. by 1 point or 3 points or 6 points i don't care as long as when the final whistle blows the pats have more points than the other team.

and yeah, football is a TEAM game. the qb dumps off passes to his rb or throws bombs down the field while the o-line blocks and then the kicker kicks the winning fg. didn't manning just do that to allow tynes to FINALLY convert on fg? hmmmm.

yes, he needed his kicker. the kicker and the defense won the game for them. we can admit it. we are not all in love with Manning. we do however love our defense.

giants historical identity is running game and defensive juggernaut.

patriots historical identity is cheaters with a great field goal kicker..

ha ha hahahahaha!

JSBE

Flannel Shirt wrote:

On offense, Giants must establish the run and keep the ball out of Patriots hands. Simple as that. Every drive must equal a score or a win in the field position battle.

like the jags did 2 weeks ago? wait, the pats held them to half of their rushing average beat them. how about like the giants were supposed to do in week 17? wait, the pats held their running in check and beat them.

and hochstein and o'callaghan will not be starting this time around - neal and kaczur will. strahan couldn't get pressure on brady again their back-ups.

JSBE

Flannel Shirt wrote:

yes, he needed his kicker. the kicker and the defense won the game for them. we can admit it. we are not all in love with Manning. we do however love our defense.

giants historical identity is running game and defensive juggernaut.

patriots historical identity is cheaters with a great field goal kicker..

ha ha hahahahaha!

zzzzzzzz. yawn. will someone wake me up when a pats hater comes up with something new? i might be sleeping for a while.

LONGRD

NY PJ1 wrote:

is it a combination of 6 states to make 1 football team?

Where are you going with this thing?

it's like saying The Golden State Warriors basketball team are made up of the entire California state. But technically, they play in Oakland, CA.
The L.A. Angels of Anaheim plays in Anaheim but has Los Angeles in their name.

It's just a freckin' name.

In fact, if the entire states of New England and its residents pay for the Patriots, the stadium and etc..., that a really smart move for the organization.

Flannel Shirt

JSBE wrote:

like the jags did 2 weeks ago? wait, the pats held them to half of their rushing average beat them. how about like the giants were supposed to do in week 17? wait, the pats held their running in check and beat them.

and hochstein and o'callaghan will not be starting this time around - neal and kaczur will. strahan couldn't get pressure on brady again their back-ups.

jags were in that game. a few plays here and there and its a different outcome. sure, could have, would have, should have, but the game plan in my mind was fantastic. jags played them perfectly. they were in that game until the end, and thats all they could ask for.

jimed14

Flannel Shirt wrote:

yes, he needed his kicker. the kicker and the defense won the game for them. we can admit it. we are not all in love with Manning. we do however love our defense.

giants historical identity is running game and defensive juggernaut.

patriots historical identity is cheaters with a great field goal kicker..

ha ha hahahahaha!

and indeed, the Patriots ARE a team, and they have won 3 superbowls. with defense, speacial teams, AND offense.

You're not in love with Manning becuse you're nervous as hell he's going to throw up a stink bomb in the superbowl

we're not worried about our 3 time superbowl champ, 2 time superbowl MVP, league MVP, and first ballot HOF quarterback.

JSBE

Flannel Shirt wrote:

You want to hear how the Giants are going to beat the Patriots?

Trick play Z dragon ball niner red slash zingo on two.

I assume that since we are all in here giving shit back and forth we know something about football. Giants must stop the big play (moss), pressure Brady, and keep an eye on Welker. Sure, this leaves Faulk open, but make them earn it.

ok, stop moss, pressure brady and "keep an eye on welker" and the giants D will still have to deal with stallworth, gaffney, watson, maroney, kyle brady as well as faulk. hopefully the giants secondary heals quick from their abdominal strains and dislocated shoulders.

Flannel Shirt

JSBE wrote:

zzzzzzzz. yawn. will someone wake me up when a pats hater comes up with something new? i might be sleeping for a while.

if you want me to start making shit up, I can, but it would be kind of stupid.

the facts are what they are, no?

Patriots cheated. Anyone arguing this? They were punished for it, no?

They won 3 superbowls on last second field goals? Am I misspeaking? I think I had the scores right? No?

Flannel Shirt

JSBE wrote:

ok, stop moss, pressure brady and "keep an eye on welker" and the giants D will still have to deal with stallworth, gaffney, watson, maroney, kyle brady as well as faulk. hopefully the giants secondary heals quick from their abdominal strains and dislocated shoulders.

we play with dislocated shoulders.

fuck stallworth. he sucks. yeah yeah yeah....he stinks.

watson, fuck that fat bastard as well. non factor. you will need him to block.

jimed14

Flannel Shirt wrote:

if you want me to start making shit up, I can, but it would be kind of stupid.

the facts are what they are, no?

Patriots cheated. Anyone arguing this? They were punished for it, no?

They won 3 superbowls on last second field goals? Am I misspeaking? I think I had the scores right? No?

the superbowl against the eagles was not a last second FG fucktard ... learn your history.

JSBE

Flannel Shirt wrote:

jags were in that game. a few plays here and there and its a different outcome. sure, could have, would have, should have, but the game plan in my mind was fantastic. jags played them perfectly. they were in that game until the end, and thats all they could ask for.

except the pats held them to 6 points in the 2nd half. how were they still in the game? it was 28-17 at the end of the 3rd quarter. when does 45 mins equal a whole football game?

LONGRD

jimed14 wrote:

You're not in love with Manning becuse you're nervous as hell he's going to throw up a stink bomb in the superbowl

Eli's mojo is cooling off at the moment right now. He'll become the old unreliable overrated QB again during game time.

Eli = Rex Grossman, when game time starts.

Flannel Shirt

JSBE wrote:

except the pats held them to 6 points in the 2nd half. how were they still in the game? it was 28-17 at the end of the 3rd quarter. when does 45 mins equal a whole football game?

yes, you got me on the field goals. fucktard deserved. harsh, but deserved. 2 out of 3. my bizzad.

down by 11 is not in the game? whos the fucktard?