When somebody steals a 163 Million dollar painting..
LikeAnOcean
Posts: 7,718
What, do they just put that shit up on Craigslist?
http://www.cnn.com/2008/SHOWBIZ/02/11/art.theft/index.html
How the hell do you find a buyer without it being obvious that you have a one of a kind stolen painting?
http://www.cnn.com/2008/SHOWBIZ/02/11/art.theft/index.html
How the hell do you find a buyer without it being obvious that you have a one of a kind stolen painting?
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
Stolen paintings are usually stolen with a purchaser already lined up. Although maybe freecylce would work.
"The leads are weak? Fuckin' leads are weak? You're Weak! I've Been in this business 15 years"
"What's your name?"
"FUCK YOU! THAT"S MY NAME!"
but then what does the purchaser do with it??? if paintings are just being passed around underground wouldn't they lose their value??
maybe a few million but thats crazy
At least that's how I plan to do it once I become super rich.
Bingo... and displaying it wouldn't necessarily be much of a problem, you can always try to pass it off as a reproduction.
Admin
Social awareness does not equal political activism!
5/23/2011- An utter embarrassment... ticketing failures too many to list.
I don't get it either.
I'm sure, as someone said, paintings are stolen with a buyer in place.. But then what the hell does that buyer do? Hang it up in a basement so no one can see it? It just seems odd. I'd rather spent $50 on a print and just tell people I stole it, at least when the cops come they can ID it as a fake.
especially how they value these paintings!! :eek:
Well he stole the painting to get the girl. Which I guess can be a real life motive. You do get a good look at how a stolen painting would be handled by the police though, and the technology used to determine whether or not a painting is real.
The nazis stole so much art they are still recovering it today, and much has never been found. Museums have even been duped into buying stolen stuff. They wait a few years for things to cool off then move it on the black market. There are a lot of people who don't give a shit about laws, love art, and have lots of $$$$. It is pretty scary how many thefts there are a year from little churches to major museums. Fuck the Mona Lisa was stolen for cryin out loud!
this is a cool website, but a little out of date:
http://www.saztv.com/
and
http://www.nepip.org/index.cfm?menu_type=
Oh yeah the thomas crown affair is a cool idea, but his method would have totally ruined the work of art, exposing a 100 year old painting to that amount of moisture and layering paint over it completely would be a nightmare for a conservator. not to mention the fucking lame ass museum people who couldn't notice the texture of another paiting underneath a water based fake. In addition having a guoache painting over an oil would be hard to do and not have any trained eye see it was not legit as Impressionists mostly paintied in oils, and Gouache is so not oil paint. A fucking 4th grader could tell the difference between an oil and a gouach painting over an oil. Watercolor would never cover an oil painting, and acrylic would be permanent. Water based oils would also be pretty permanent when dry so the only paint he could use that would wash off with water would be Tempera or guache, both very chalky, crackable(on top of an oil based ground would crack a bunch)
So yeah it is a movie, but even a lame as museum like that could see the "donated" painting was not legit. Especially since they'd have to examine it for insurance purposes and photograph it etc.
It still was cool in the movie though.
van goghs go from 20-100 million nowadyas, Monets 7-60 mil, Cez 20-80 mil, and Degas 1-10 mil. Of course it all depends on what work, when it was made, and what is it of.
Don't be mankind. ~Captain Beefheart
__________________________________
LOL!!! Me neither...that's why I never persued a career in it.