Endgame

12345AGNST1

http://youtube.com/watch?v=25yhygUkecE

I heard about this from my cousins a few hours ago. Thought everyone should see this. This is why I don't trust this government at all. Everything the media feeds us us BS to me.

DriftingByTheStorm

Endgame is right the fuck on.,

Of course,
for people who don't understand the eugenics background of the Rockefeller family, or the arrogance of the elite towards the "eaters" in general, this reeks of sensationalized garbage.

However, i suspect even the extrapolations on where this is all going are correct ... with the caveat which Angelica has helped to bring me around to: namely, that any overt imbalance of "evil" against "good" brings about the potential of a increased vigilance of "good" to counterveil this threat.

The worry is that by the time the masses wake up to see the trap,
it has already been sprung.

Desperate people do stupid things.
Selling soverignty for saftey has me worried,
and as banks start failing and food riots start occuring more frequently,
who knows what idiotic "legislation" will get passed handing over powers and rights to these elite fuckheads.

Anyway,
also check out esoteric agenda

we had some great discussions in that thread as well.

The movie puts a tad more of a positive spin on things,
at least at the end of the movie.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

One thing about Alex is he's generally been aloof to the whole Israel situation.

Whether this is by force or choice is the question. But if anyone should know about this it would be him...one would think.

DriftingByTheStorm

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

One thing about Alex is he's generally been aloof to the whole Israel situation.

Whether this is by force or choice is the question. But if anyone should know about this it would be him...one would think.

That's not true.
Alex is just as quick to acknowledge the involvement of Zionist opportunist, as he is to talk about the Catholic power structure and the pope.

I understand why you say that, because he doesn't usually bring it up voluntarily. If someone calls in to his radio show, he will more than happily cover it ad naseum.

What Alex Jones DOES do is generally stay away from assigning leadership within the power structure to any one group.

I mean, he recognizes the importance Zionism plays in the equation, as does he the Roman Catholic church. However because he understands that discussion of any of those things is secondary to the real concern ( awakening people to the root problems of the elitist agenda) and because he knows that misinterpretation of his remarks on those subjects can bring massive dissent within the "revolution", he chooses to side step the issue of assigning "blame" to any one group.

He tries to recognize them all, and then quickly moves back to discussing the issues.

Another thing i've noticed is he doesn't like to lay blame in high profile matters in general. Like with JFK, he is more than happy to talk about single bullet theory, or inconsistencies in the story, however GOOD LUCK getting him to discuss George HW Bush and his possible involvement while he is on air. Discussing the issues is one thing, pointing the finger at current figure heads can be suicidal.

Not that he doesn't have balls. He just is smart enough to use strategy and not paint an even larger target on his forehead.