Does Obama Have An Anger Problem?

g under pg under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
edited September 2008 in A Moving Train
That's right. Obama may be the candidate with the anger problem -- a problem in that it seems he can't get angry. Or is it that he doesn't think he can let us see him get mad? Whatever it is, it's a problem that could cost him the election.

It occurred to me when I was watching Steve Kroft interview him on 60 Minutes. There's a little bit of a distance. Obama's holding back. There's a coolness there that might be good for governance, but isn't so good for politicking. It might explain why so many voters still can't connect with him on a gut level.

I'm not talking about the web crazies who rant about the HALF-BLACK Barack HUSSEIN Obama being a secret MUSLIM. (Curiously many of the same people who insist Obama is a secret MUSLIM are also enraged about Obama's longtime pastor, Reverend Wright. Does that make Reverend Wright a secret IMAM?) I'm talking about the rational voters who, after all these months, still don't feel like they know who he is.

To be sure Obama expresses disapproval. During the debates he could be testy and aloof. (Remember telling Hillary she was "likable enough"?) On the stump recently he's been indignant about the McCain/Palin ads. But he never boils over, lets someone have it.
....

I most certainly believe Obama has a anger problem. It seems to me once in awhile he needs to get pissed off about something, show and let the citizenry know he CARES emotionally.

Here's the article on Obama's Anger Problem

Peace
*We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • digsterdigster Posts: 1,293
    As sad as this sounds, I think this is one of the ramifications of the race issue that is playing out in this campaign. He cannot be seen or viewed as the "angry black man." I don't think it should matter, but it will to people, and it could cost him the election.
  • digster wrote:
    As sad as this sounds, I think this is one of the ramifications of the race issue that is playing out in this campaign. He cannot be seen or viewed as the "angry black man." I don't think it should matter, but it will to people, and it could cost him the election.

    I completely agree. There is already a general consensus among the "low information voters" that Michelle Obama is an "angry black activist". To show too much emotion could be dangerous for him. Which is fucking ridiculous...
  • jimed14jimed14 Posts: 9,488
    I completely agree. There is already a general consensus among the "low information voters" that Michelle Obama is an "angry black activist". To show too much emotion could be dangerous for him. Which is fucking ridiculous...

    exactly ... every chance Bill O'Reilly gets, he calls Michelle "angry" ... and it disgusts me ... because you can see the racist tones behind it ...

    So, Obama HAS to be cool and collected at all times.
    "You're one of the few Red Sox fans I don't mind." - Newch91

    "I don't believe in damn curses. Wake up the damn Bambino and have me face him. Maybe I'll drill him in the ass." --- Pedro Martinez
  • digster wrote:
    As sad as this sounds, I think this is one of the ramifications of the race issue that is playing out in this campaign. He cannot be seen or viewed as the "angry black man." I don't think it should matter, but it will to people, and it could cost him the election.


    I agree also..
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


    As individual fingers we can easily be broken, but together we make a mighty fist ~ Sitting Bull
  • Yeah, boiling over worked out real well for this guy...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDwODbl3muE
  • Yeah, boiling over worked out real well for this guy...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDwODbl3muE

    lol, great point. :) I actually had a dream about this the other night, lol.
  • g under pg under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
    digster wrote:
    As sad as this sounds, I think this is one of the ramifications of the race issue that is playing out in this campaign. He cannot be seen or viewed as the "angry black man." I don't think it should matter, but it will to people, and it could cost him the election.

    Nail on the head, he has to play it cool and he KNOWS it or he'll painted in a corner as the angry black man. "Then the question will be Do you want this angry man presiding over this country."

    However, showing a little something every now and then would cool. I wonder what would get under his skin?

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • jimed14jimed14 Posts: 9,488
    g under p wrote:
    Nail on the head, he has to play it cool and he KNOWS it or he'll painted in a corner as the angry black man. "Then the question will be Do you want this angry man presiding over this country."

    However, showing a little something every now and then would cool. I wonder what would get under his skin?

    Peace


    I think he's balanced it well ... especially in the past week or so. firm, but not angry.

    The only think about Obama that I think might play poorly, he tends to stutter at the outset when he's excited to defend or argue a position.
    "You're one of the few Red Sox fans I don't mind." - Newch91

    "I don't believe in damn curses. Wake up the damn Bambino and have me face him. Maybe I'll drill him in the ass." --- Pedro Martinez
  • spongersponger Posts: 3,159
    On the other hand, the African American culture does expect men to show anger as a symbol of their masculinity.
  • I'm pretty tired of people making excuses for everything Obama does based upon the fact that they apparently believe everyone in America is racist.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • digsterdigster Posts: 1,293
    I'm pretty tired of people making excuses for everything Obama does based upon the fact that they apparently believe everyone in America is racist.

    Where did I say once that everyone in America was racist?
  • jimed14jimed14 Posts: 9,488
    I'm pretty tired of people making excuses for everything Obama does based upon the fact that they apparently believe everyone in America is racist.

    did anyone say that "everyone in America" is racist?

    (I'm not even touching sponger's comment)
    "You're one of the few Red Sox fans I don't mind." - Newch91

    "I don't believe in damn curses. Wake up the damn Bambino and have me face him. Maybe I'll drill him in the ass." --- Pedro Martinez
  • jimed14 wrote:
    did anyone say that "everyone in America" is racist?

    (I'm not even touching sponger's comment)


    "everyone" doesn't matter, it's the excuse given every time, I'm tired of it.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • __ Posts: 6,651
    "everyone" doesn't matter, it's the excuse given every time, I'm tired of it.

    Every time what?
  • g under pg under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
    sponger wrote:
    On the other hand, the African American culture does expect men to show anger as a symbol of their masculinity.

    I'm from that culture and you certainly have this totally wrong. One of the things my Irish lady likes about me is that I can keep my cool in critical situations, therefore my username. She's a redhead firey person I'm cool, this has nothing to do with symbols of masculinity.

    That's total nonsense.

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • spongersponger Posts: 3,159
    jimed14 wrote:
    did anyone say that "everyone in America" is racist?

    (I'm not even touching sponger's comment)


    The comments about Obama being perceived as "an angry black man" imply that Americans are still judging him by his skin color, which is indicative of racism.

    And my comment is 100% true. The African American population in the US for the most part identifies with its own set of cultural behavioralisms.

    This is why many black female recording artists in the US complain of sexism within the hip hop industry moreso than their white counterparts.

    In fact, when marketing agencies target minority consumers, they design their marketing strategies aorund known culturally linked behavioral traits with which those minority groups identify.
  • spongersponger Posts: 3,159
    g under p wrote:
    I'm from that culture and you certainly have this totally wrong. One of the things my Irish lady likes about me is that I can keep my cool in critical situations, therefore my username. She's a redhead firey person I'm cool, this has nothing to do with symbols of masculinity.

    That's total nonsense.

    Peace

    There are always exceptions, and you clearly are an exception. Nodbody likes to be categorized even when it's an accurate categorization, so of course you're going to try to downplay anything even resembling such.
  • sponger wrote:
    On the other hand, the African American culture does expect men to show anger as a symbol of their masculinity.


    That is applicable to american culture. Not just just to one of the races found in america.
  • g under pg under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
    Sponger I have some respect for you cause I appreciate you editing what you previously said. I believe you took a look at what you said and saw that was not the appropriate thing to say.

    I was going to come at ya but at the same time keep my cool. :D

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • That is applicable to american culture. Not just just to one of the races found in america.

    As is the anger thing...see how that works?
    hippiemom = goodness
  • spongersponger Posts: 3,159
    g under p wrote:
    Sponger I have some respect for you cause I appreciate you editing what you previously said. I believe you took a look at what you said and saw that was not the appropriate thing to say.

    I was going to come at ya but at the same time keep my cool. :D

    Peace

    I edited it out only because your post spoke for itself, and I was going to let others figure it out on their own.
  • As is the anger thing...see how that works?


    What? that's what I was talking about.
  • What? that's what I was talking about.


    Sorry, I was using your quote to reiterate my point about everyone blaming how Obama "has to act" for fear of racism all the time...

    Wasn't directed at you.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • digsterdigster Posts: 1,293
    "everyone" doesn't matter, it's the excuse given every time, I'm tired of it.

    Everyone does matter, apparently to you, why else would you have said it? No one in this thread, or any other thread I've seen, has said that everyone in America is racist. Many people, including myself have acknowledged that race will play a factor in this election, and considering how close this election will probably be, it could be a game-changing factor. I think for someone to believe otherwise they would have to jump through quite a few logistical hoops. It's just not realistic to say it won't be a part of this election.
  • spongersponger Posts: 3,159
    That is applicable to american culture. Not just just to one of the races found in america.

    I think David Chappelle's sketch about a black head of household switching places with a white head of household pretty much sums up the reality of that which I am speaking.
  • digster wrote:
    Everyone does matter, apparently to you, why else would you have said it? No one in this thread, or any other thread I've seen, has said that everyone in America is racist. Many people, including myself have acknowledged that race will play a factor in this election, and considering how close this election will probably be, it could be a game-changing factor. I think for someone to believe otherwise they would have to jump through quite a few logistical hoops. It's just not realistic to say it won't be a part of this election.


    Semantics...you are assuming it matters to enough people that he wouldn't be elected. You are saying that people (you didn't say some ;) once again semantics) would see him as an angry black man.

    Those that won't vote for him because he's black already don't need an outburst from him to make that decision...now do they? It wouldn't change a thing based on racist voters.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • digsterdigster Posts: 1,293
    Semantics...you are assuming it matters to enough people that he wouldn't be elected. You are saying that people (you didn't say some ;) once again semantics) would see him as an angry black man.

    Those that won't vote for him because he's black already don't need an outburst from him to make that decision...now do they? It wouldn't change a thing based on racist voters.

    I don't know...I don't think racism and prejudice is as simple and as easily defined as to divy it up into racism and non-racism. I think it's wrong in any respect, but that doesn't mean it's a black and white issue (no pun intended). Many people who cast a vote against him because he's black would probably never admit that in public. But when you have 12% of Democratic white voters in Pennsylvania saying they voted against Obama on the basis of racism, and you have people theorizing through polling that Obama could lose as many as 6 percentage points due to racism, and when you take into account that for the simple fact that most people who are racist are not going to openly and knowingly admit it to a pollster which means that those numbers are probably far higher....

    .....yeah, taking all that into account, I think it's going to be a pretty significant part of this election.
  • digster wrote:
    I don't know...I don't think racism and prejudice is as simple and as easily defined as to divy it up into racism and non-racism. I think it's wrong in any respect, but that doesn't mean it's a black and white issue (no pun intended). Many people who cast a vote against him because he's black would probably never admit that in public. But when you have 12% of Democratic white voters in Pennsylvania saying they voted against Obama on the basis of racism, and you have people theorizing through polling that Obama could lose as many as 6 percentage points due to racism, and when you take into account that for the simple fact that most people who are racist are not going to openly and knowingly admit it to a pollster which means that those numbers are probably far higher....

    .....yeah, taking all that into account, I think it's going to be a pretty significant part of this election.


    I htink you didn't read my post. Certainly people won't vote for him based on race (just as some people will vote for him based solely on race). But they are already not going to vote for him whether or not they'll publicly admit it or admit why. So, an outburst making these people see him as an angry black man will have no effect over their vote, as they have already made up their minds.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • digsterdigster Posts: 1,293
    I htink you didn't read my post. Certainly people won't vote for him based on race (just as some people will vote for him based solely on race). But they are already not going to vote for him whether or not they'll publicly admit it or admit why. So, an outburst making these people see him as an angry black man will have no effect over their vote, as they have already made up their minds.

    I did read your post, and that is why I responded with the assertion that racism is not that simple. There are many people who are undecided, who may have concisious or unconcisous racial tendencies. Obama has probably realized he cannot appear threatening to these people. I doubt most of the racists in this country walk around with the constant realization and acknowledgment, "I'm a racist"...many people, including myself at times in my life, have held racial attitudes without realizing it. Yes, there are definitely racists who will no way, no how vote for a black man, but there are also many others who probably do not like McCain but may be wary of voting for Obama because he's black.

    Also, the idea that the whites who will vote against Obama due to his skin color, and the blacks who will vote for him due to his skin color will create an equal balancing allowing the issues to flourish is just unlikely. The percentage of the electorate in 2004 was about 80% white. Even with more black turnout this time around, it's still probably going to be about 75% white...and minority voters have tended to vote in overwhelming numbers for the Democratic candidate anyway. So, if those numbers were a little more even, maybe we could talk about the race votes being a wash.
  • digster wrote:
    Also, the idea that the whites who will vote against Obama due to his skin color, and the blacks who will vote for him due to his skin color will create an equal balancing allowing the issues to flourish is just unlikely. The percentage of the electorate in 2004 was about 80% white. Even with more black turnout this time around, it's still probably going to be about 75% white...and minority voters have tended to vote in overwhelming numbers for the Democratic candidate anyway. So, if those numbers were a little more even, maybe we could talk about the race votes being a wash.


    Where did I say it was an equal balance? I didn't. Never said it was a wash, not once. You're trying to debate me about the effect of racism while I'm trying to stick only the topic of an Obama outburst. We're not even talking the same thing.
    hippiemom = goodness
Sign In or Register to comment.