Is CHINA Setting A New Gold Standard?

g under pg under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
edited August 2008 in A Moving Train
BEIJING At the End of Yesterday's Competition, China Had 22 Gold Medals, Which Is 12 More Than The United States. And Apart From Swimming, American Athletes Have Had Trouble Finding Their Way to the Top of the Medal Stand.


Watch out. Here comes China. If the United States doesn't wake up, by Aug. 24 it may be saying, "There goes China."

After just six days of Olympic competition, the host country was on the verge of stunning the world. At the 2004 Games, China had 32 gold medals, four fewer than the U.S. team. In these Games, China already had 22 gold medals -- just one shy of the next three countries combined, the United States (10), Germany (7) and South Korea (6) -- through the end of competition Thursday.

To be sure, track and field, in which the United States always has been strong and China barely existent, has just begun, so the numbers surely will change.

But every day, China asserts itself in a different sport, winning gold medals in eight areas, while the United States has been all but inept at everything except swimming.

Without the five gold medals won by Michael Phelps individually or as part of a relay team entering Friday, China would lead the United States in gold medals, 22-5.

Is CHINA Setting A New Gold Standard?

Does it seem a strange that the Chinese are able to dominate so far in winning so many gold medals or is it that their on their home turf?

The USA seems to be getting weaker in everything but swimming and track & field.

Peace
*We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • Smellyman2Smellyman2 Posts: 689
    China is just going to become more and more dominant economically and athletically.

    As more and more of the Chinese people are becoming "well off". I heard somewhere there is as much middle to upper class Chinese people as there are in the US. More and more of the 1 billion others are moving that direction, they will now have time to concentrate on "hobbies" like athletics.

    The US isn't really becoming weaker. There is just more competition now.
  • FrankBauerFrankBauer Posts: 453
    they will now have time to concentrate on "hobbies" like athletics.

    smelly, you're in hong kong, its not like that. its very "calculated" in china. they've been preparing years for this "coming out party" at the olympics where they intended to take the medal count. pulling kids away from their families at 4 or 5 years specifically for these olympics. they are dominating because they focused on EVERY sport across the board, not just the "popular" ones. they have rigorous programs in place, its intense. the US really doesnt concentrate on sports such as shooting or weight lifting or badminton or ping pong.

    while i agree with you that as the economic situation improves, people can concentrate more on athletic hobbies, i just dont think thats the case with china and these olympics.

    but i do agree with smelly, its not the US getting worse, its the rest of the world catching up.
  • Smellyman2Smellyman2 Posts: 689
    I know that as well. but many countries do that. Even paying athletes if they win medals.

    China will continue to dominate.
  • g under pg under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
    FrankBauer wrote:
    smelly, you're in hong kong, its not like that. its very "calculated" in china. they've been preparing years for this "coming out party" at the olympics where they intended to take the medal count. pulling kids away from their families at 4 or 5 years specifically for these olympics. they are dominating because they focused on EVERY sport across the board, not just the "popular" ones. they have rigorous programs in place, its intense. the US really doesnt concentrate on sports such as shooting or weight lifting or badminton or ping pong.

    while i agree with you that as the economic situation improves, people can concentrate more on athletic hobbies, i just dont think thats the case with china and these olympics.

    but i do agree with smelly, its not the US getting worse, its the rest of the world catching up.

    Table Tennis to be precise.

    Just like in Basketball, China is making a focused attempt to dominate these Olympics.

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • FrankBauerFrankBauer Posts: 453
    Smellyman wrote:
    I know that as well. but many countries do that. Even paying athletes if they win medals.

    China will continue to dominate.

    they all pay, including US. i dont know what US athletes get for medaling, but its something, and then there are the select few who rack up endorsements. pretty much every country rewards their athletes. but with china, if you're an athlete, you're basically bringing your entire family up the socioeconomic ladder if you medal. their success is based on their program, its very structured, and government sponsored. the government is involved in everything, pulling tall people out of the 1.4 billion and putting them in basketball programs at a young age, the bendy ones in gymnastics, pairing identical bendy individuals in synchronized diving. with the government behind you, its easy to say...forge official documents to make an athlete older...

    i still think we'll be taking the overall medal count, but will get blown out in golds.
  • AnonAnon Posts: 11,175
    He just smiled and gave me a vegemite sandwich.......

    I can't help but be so proud of how the Aussies are going. They only have a population of around 20,000,000, and are sitting fourth on the medal tally.

    Rank Country Gold Silver Bronze Total
    1st China 27 12 6 45
    2nd United States 16 15 19 50
    3rd Germany 8 4 5 17
    4th Australia 7 8 10 25

    I think the US will be showing their dominance over the next few days. The track and field events have only started, and we all know how well the US is going to do there. They will shine. Absolutely overall, China is doing so well. I agree with what smellyman is saying, and i also believe that having the Olympic Games on your home ground is an advantage.
  • FrankBauerFrankBauer Posts: 453
    Pj_Gurl wrote:
    i also believe that having the Olympic Games on your home ground is an advantage.

    no doubt...have you heard about those canadians and the 2010 vancouver olympics? they are ahead of schedule in preparing the city for the big show just so theres enough time for the canadian athletes to train on the actual terrain. definitely theres a clear added advantage for being the home team.

    buts its been pretty nice in china for most of the US teams, especially basketball. they've been cheered like they're the home team. in about 15 minutes, the redeem team are about the play the blatantly racist "but-we're-not-racist spanish team" and it will feel like home court for the americans.
  • g under pg under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
    Medal Standings: US up by 8 medals however CHINA is crushing being up by 10 gold medals.

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • Have they always shown the medal standings in U.S. by ranking the countries by overall number of medals? Usually here they give certain amount of points/medal so that gold medal is more valuable in points than silver or bronze.

    Previously it hasn't probably made much difference since USA has dominated no matter how you count the medals, but just curious if they have changed it over there now so that it looks like China is behind.

    BBC, Finnish broadcasting company and the official standings all have China on top.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/olympics/medals_table/default.stm
    http://www.noc.fi/olympiahistoria/kisasivut/peking-kisasivut/mitalitaulukko/
    http://results.beijing2008.cn/WRM/ENG/INF/GL/95A/GL0000000.shtml

    So is it politics or just different systems? :)
  • g under pg under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
    Have they always shown the medal standings in U.S. by ranking the countries by overall number of medals? Usually here they give certain amount of points/medal so that gold medal is more valuable in points than silver or bronze.

    Previously it hasn't probably made much difference since USA has dominated no matter how you count the medals, but just curious if they have changed it over there now so that it looks like China is behind.

    BBC, Finnish broadcasting company and the official standings all have China on top.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/olympics/medals_table/default.stm
    http://www.noc.fi/olympiahistoria/kisasivut/peking-kisasivut/mitalitaulukko/
    http://results.beijing2008.cn/WRM/ENG/INF/GL/95A/GL0000000.shtml

    So is it politics or just different systems? :)

    That's interesting I took a look at that points system and I've never seen that set up on any US medal standings. However, I gather you can set up whatever system you want to make your country politically and athletically stronger.

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • meisteredermeistereder Posts: 1,577
    I am pretty sure they used to rank the medals in the standings they showed in the US. Now of course we look at bronzes equally to golds. And the US is kicking everyone's asses in bronzes, so there.
    San Diego 10/25/00, Mountain View 6/1/03, Santa Barbara 10/28/03, Northwest School 3/18/05, San Diego 7/7/06, Los Angeles 7/9/06, 7/10/06, Honolulu (U2) 12/9/06, Santa Barbara (EV) 4/10/08, Los Angeles (EV) 4/12/08, Hartford 6/27/08, Mansfield 6/28/08, VH1 Rock Honors The Who 7/12/08, Seattle 9/21/09, Universal City 9/30/09, 10/1/09, 10/6/09, 10/7/09, San Diego 10/9/09, Los Angeles (EV) 7/8/11, Santa Barbara (EV) 7/9/11, Chicago 7/19/13, San Diego 11/21/13, Los Angeles 11/23/13, 11/24/13, Oakland 11/26/13, Chicago 8/22/16, Missoula 8/13/18, Boston 9/2/18, Los Angeles 2/25/22 (EV), San Diego 5/3/22, Los Angeles 5/6/22, 5/7/22, Imola 6/25/22, Los Angeles 5/21/24, [London 6/29/24], [Boston 9/15/24]
  • SongburstSongburst Posts: 1,195
    Typically host nations pour money into amateur athletics when they host the Olympics.

    The Chinese can take solice in the fact that they dominated the boring Summer Olympics. The Winter Olympics is where the men and women are separated from the boys and girls. Skating or running? Ski jumping or long jumping? Aerials or diving? Curling or ping pong (most good curlers hold a 5th of whiskey in their broom handles)? Any schmo can slap a wetsuit on, oxygenate their blood and win 8 gold medals in swimming.
    1/12/1879, 4/8/1156, 2/6/1977, who gives a shit, ...
  • g under pg under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
    STANDINGS The US only ahead by 4 medals and China crushing at 35-19 in Gold medals.

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    Songburst wrote:
    Typically host nations pour money into amateur athletics when they host the Olympics.

    The Chinese can take solice in the fact that they dominated the boring Summer Olympics. The Winter Olympics is where the men and women are separated from the boys and girls. Skating or running? Ski jumping or long jumping? Aerials or diving? Curling or ping pong (most good curlers hold a 5th of whiskey in their broom handles)? Any schmo can slap a wetsuit on, oxygenate their blood and win 8 gold medals in swimming.

    so i take it youre not just any schmo, cause i doubt you could slap on a wetsuit and win 8 gold medals.
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • g under pg under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
    so i take it youre not just any schmo, cause i doubt you could slap on a wetsuit and win 8 gold medals.

    I've just decided to save up and go to London for 2012 Olympics. I've already have a place to stay, I just need to figure out how to get tickets. Some of them being the swimming events and especially Michael Phelps. Seeing his magic or the track field events beats anything in the winter Olympics which is over in the blink of an eye.

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • 'Dem slant eyes are cheatin'
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • g under pg under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
    'Dem slant eyes are cheatin'

    I'm sure there was a better you could've put that. There's no whining in THE GAMES, beat them nuff said.

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • Solat13Solat13 Posts: 6,996
    Does it really matter? I mean when the Soviet Union was still together they dominated the Olympics winning overall medal count from 72-92 other than 84 when they boycotted. I know 92 was technically the Unified Team, but it was still all the Russian countries in one block.

    So, if you're saying that the US reign of 3 Olympics of winning the most gold is over than it is. But host countries always try to make a statement at the Olympics and have a medal "bounce". Before this Olympics, China never finished higher than 3rd in the medal count overall and were 2nd in golds in 2004. If they win again in 2012, then your argument has merit, but the fact that it is the host country has to be taken into the argument. Greece won 16 total medals in Athens in 2004. So far this Olympics they have 3 total and they won 13 in 1996. Australia won 58 total when they hosted in 2000 and 41 in 96 and 49 in 2004 respectively.
    - Busted down the pretext
    - 8/28/98
    - 9/2/00
    - 4/28/03, 5/3/03, 7/3/03, 7/5/03, 7/6/03, 7/9/03, 7/11/03, 7/12/03, 7/14/03
    - 9/28/04, 9/29/04, 10/1/04, 10/2/04
    - 9/11/05, 9/12/05, 9/13/05, 9/30/05, 10/1/05, 10/3/05
    - 5/12/06, 5/13/06, 5/27/06, 5/28/06, 5/30/06, 6/1/06, 6/3/06, 6/23/06, 7/22/06, 7/23/06, 12/2/06, 12/9/06
    - 8/2/07, 8/5/07
    - 6/19/08, 6/20/08, 6/22/08, 6/24/08, 6/25/08, 6/27/08, 6/28/08, 6/30/08, 7/1/08
    - 8/23/09, 8/24/09, 9/21/09, 9/22/09, 10/27/09, 10/28/09, 10/30/09, 10/31/09
    - 5/15/10, 5/17/10, 5/18/10, 5/20/10, 5/21/10, 10/23/10, 10/24/10
    - 9/11/11, 9/12/11
    - 10/18/13, 10/21/13, 10/22/13, 11/30/13, 12/4/13
  • g under pg under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
    Solat13 wrote:
    Does it really matter? I mean when the Soviet Union was still together they dominated the Olympics winning overall medal count from 72-92 other than 84 when they boycotted. I know 92 was technically the Unified Team, but it was still all the Russian countries in one block.

    So, if you're saying that the US reign of 3 Olympics of winning the most gold is over than it is. But host countries always try to make a statement at the Olympics and have a medal "bounce". Before this Olympics, China never finished higher than 3rd in the medal count overall and were 2nd in golds in 2004. If they win again in 2012, then your argument has merit, but the fact that it is the host country has to be taken into the argument. Greece won 16 total medals in Athens in 2004. So far this Olympics they have 3 total and they won 13 in 1996. Australia won 58 total when they hosted in 2000 and 41 in 96 and 49 in 2004 respectively.

    It makes no difference to me, I read this article in the Washington Post and posted it with a question. All I know is they're doing very well and I hope to be there in London 2012.

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • Well I can probably shed some light on this, I've been living in Shanghai for almost a year. I just got back from Beijing where I scalped tickets to a couple events and I've been here for the build up and reading and watching A LOT of Olympic coverage.

    There are essentially two systems now for counting medals. The US-Russia backed system simply counts the number of combined medals (Gold-Silver-Bronze) and essentially whoever has the most is the "winner" if you can call it that.

    The Chinese system is simply to count whoever has the most gold medals as the winner. (Supposedly their was a government sports official quoted as saying one gold medal was worth 100 silvers)

    The reason that the Soviet Union and the USA tend to dominate the Olympic tallies generally comes down to a matter of bulk. Those countries are usually the only two to place athletes in almost every single event. But at least in the post-cold war times neither country really spends tremendous amounts of money training athletes specifically for the Olympics. I think it the US you can apply for some kind of training stipend, and there are many companies (UPS and Staples come to mind) who use athletes in their workforce for PR purposes and probably give them pretty generous benefits to train.

    The United States Olympic athletes are in general an offshoot of a huge middle class sports culture that begins at childhood and continues well into and after University for amateur athletes, but the onus of personal responsibility is on the athlete and not the state.

    China on the other hand does not have a well established middle class or nearly the same sports culture that the United States has. What China does is essentially pluck potential athletes out of the poorest areas of China when they are children and then the government raises them through "sports schools." Essentially they home grow poor children in an environment designed to make them Olympic Gold Medalists. They also put extreme efforts into placing their athletes into relatively obscure events (a la women's weightlifting) in the hopes of securing more gold medals. This seems to have been quite effective so far.

    China has also put together the largest olympic team in history. Which basically nullifies the buckshot advantage the US and Russia have enjoyed for some time.

    Though the air quality may have some affect on the athletes I wouldn't really consider it a major advantage or hurdle (no pun intended) with the possible exception of super long distance events. There was a story going around that the British Equestrian team arrived at the Los Angeles games with face masks on their horses. Two of the days I was in Beijing were some of the clearest most beautiful blue skies I'd seen in a year in China. I think the pollution merely makes the bad days look really bad, but the good days seem the same as anywhere else.

    China came in third at the Sydney games, and second in Athens, I think it's more than likely that they are going to take everything here. This country is extraordinarily patriotic (like civil war reenactors on meth) and everyone who wins a gold medal here is going to be a national hero for some time.

    Heiwa,

    ETE
  • Kel VarnsenKel Varnsen Posts: 1,952
    A few times on CBC the commentators have mentioned that home court advantage is projected to give the Chinese a boost of 7-8 medals. They said it is mostly in the judged sports where as unbiased as the judges are it is hard to ignore a stadium full of fans cheering on their Chinese athletes, when you are deciding on a diving or gymnastics score.
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    A few times on CBC the commentators have mentioned that home court advantage is projected to give the Chinese a boost of 7-8 medals. They said it is mostly in the judged sports where as unbiased as the judges are it is hard to ignore a stadium full of fans cheering on their Chinese athletes, when you are deciding on a diving or gymnastics score.

    yeah ... i'd say they are given an advantage for sure ...
  • polaris wrote:
    yeah ... i'd say they are given an advantage for sure ...

    Well most of the Chinese divers are defending the gold medals they won in Athens and they executed most of their dives pretty flawlessly so I don't think that argument really holds up.

    Also the US women's gymnastics team was pretty far ahead of their Chinese counterparts in the team excercises, but they made some mistakes during their last round, the Chinese team didn't make any mistakes, so they won.

    In the events I saw, such as boxing (the point system is determined by four judges making simultaneous decisions) there wasn't a single Chinese judge.
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    Well most of the Chinese divers are defending the gold medals they won in Athens and they executed most of their dives pretty flawlessly so I don't think that argument really holds up.

    Also the US women's gymnastics team was pretty far ahead of their Chinese counterparts in the team excercises, but they made some mistakes during their last round, the Chinese team didn't make any mistakes, so they won.

    In the events I saw, such as boxing (the point system is determined by four judges making simultaneous decisions) there wasn't a single Chinese judge.

    oh ... don't get me wrong - it's not south korea or anything ... but with judged events - it's one thing to short change someone from another country - it's just not gonna happen to any chinese athlete because they are the host nation ...

    the reason china is dominating is because they made it a priority over everything else ...

    i'm not suggesting anything is rigged just that being the host country affords some advantages ...
  • polaris wrote:
    oh ... don't get me wrong - it's not south korea or anything ... but with judged events - it's one thing to short change someone from another country - it's just not gonna happen to any chinese athlete because they are the host nation ...

    the reason china is dominating is because they made it a priority over everything else ...

    i'm not suggesting anything is rigged just that being the host country affords some advantages ...

    Fair enough. I'll agree on that one. I think 7-8 medals is a bit much, but I suppose we'll have to see.
  • Kel VarnsenKel Varnsen Posts: 1,952
    Fair enough. I'll agree on that one. I think 7-8 medals is a bit much, but I suppose we'll have to see.


    I don't think so, there are a lot of sports where judges come into play (and a lot of sports that get zero coverage), and if the 4th place guy was almost as good as the 3rd place guy but the 4th place guy is the home town favorite and is getting tons of cheering, it could possibly sway the judges to give him that extra tenth of a point he needs to get boosted to third.
  • g under pg under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
    Well I can probably shed some light on this, I've been living in Shanghai for almost a year. I just got back from Beijing where I scalped tickets to a couple events and I've been here for the build up and reading and watching A LOT of Olympic coverage.

    There are essentially two systems now for counting medals. The US-Russia backed system simply counts the number of combined medals (Gold-Silver-Bronze) and essentially whoever has the most is the "winner" if you can call it that.

    The Chinese system is simply to count whoever has the most gold medals as the winner. (Supposedly their was a government sports official quoted as saying one gold medal was worth 100 silvers)

    The reason that the Soviet Union and the USA tend to dominate the Olympic tallies generally comes down to a matter of bulk. Those countries are usually the only two to place athletes in almost every single event. But at least in the post-cold war times neither country really spends tremendous amounts of money training athletes specifically for the Olympics. I think it the US you can apply for some kind of training stipend, and there are many companies (UPS and Staples come to mind) who use athletes in their workforce for PR purposes and probably give them pretty generous benefits to train.

    The United States Olympic athletes are in general an offshoot of a huge middle class sports culture that begins at childhood and continues well into and after University for amateur athletes, but the onus of personal responsibility is on the athlete and not the state.

    China on the other hand does not have a well established middle class or nearly the same sports culture that the United States has. What China does is essentially pluck potential athletes out of the poorest areas of China when they are children and then the government raises them through "sports schools." Essentially they home grow poor children in an environment designed to make them Olympic Gold Medalists. They also put extreme efforts into placing their athletes into relatively obscure events (a la women's weightlifting) in the hopes of securing more gold medals. This seems to have been quite effective so far.

    China has also put together the largest olympic team in history. Which basically nullifies the buckshot advantage the US and Russia have enjoyed for some time.

    Though the air quality may have some affect on the athletes I wouldn't really consider it a major advantage or hurdle (no pun intended) with the possible exception of super long distance events. There was a story going around that the British Equestrian team arrived at the Los Angeles games with face masks on their horses. Two of the days I was in Beijing were some of the clearest most beautiful blue skies I'd seen in a year in China. I think the pollution merely makes the bad days look really bad, but the good days seem the same as anywhere else.

    China came in third at the Sydney games, and second in Athens, I think it's more than likely that they are going to take everything here. This country is extraordinarily patriotic (like civil war reenactors on meth) and everyone who wins a gold medal here is going to be a national hero for some time.

    Heiwa,

    ETE

    Outstanding and thanks for your very insightful thoughts on these games from the Chinese perspective. Nothing wrong with setting the stage to get your athletes ready to *go for the gold* and they're doing quite well in that area.

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • SongburstSongburst Posts: 1,195
    so i take it youre not just any schmo, cause i doubt you could slap on a wetsuit and win 8 gold medals.

    Lol -- Even with the drugs, I would just be happy to survive a 50m swim never mind win a medal.
    1/12/1879, 4/8/1156, 2/6/1977, who gives a shit, ...
  • even flow?even flow? Posts: 8,066
    I'll be worried about the Chinese when they make strides in hockey. Until then go ahead and win all the medals you want.
    You've changed your place in this world!
  • AnonAnon Posts: 11,175
    The chinese are performing better than anyone else because the are better and conditioned from a very young age if they show promise to be the best in the world.

    They were talking about the Chinese Table Tennis players on the Olympic coverage the other day. The commentators were saying that the Chinese children are tested when they are aged three, to see if they have good racket skills. If they test well, they are enrolled in special sports schools. (Whether they like it or not). When they reach age 12, the best become fulltime table tennis players.

    Those that are awesome enough to make the national squad, train insane hours, seven hours a day, seven days a week. They are not treated like kids. They are machines. Their reason for existance is to excell in table tennis. That's it. Plucked from their childhood at age 3. That's why they are better than us.
Sign In or Register to comment.