9/II Was an Inside Job REMIX...(starring Arron Russo)

g under pg under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
edited October 2007 in A Moving Train
Google Spider Goats is an interactive, informative documentary/compilation that goes from the fraud that is known as the Federal Reserve to World Trade Center 7 in less than 50 minutes.

A great film for waking up new audiences to how the United States of America's citizens are being subjected to massive deception. The film has been made for both new naive audiences with small attention spans, and truth deniers.

The film stars truth superstars Aaron Russo, Alex Jones, Steven E. Jones and Luke Rudowski. An abundance of important issues are touched on with the encouragement for the viewer to Google the subjects and read for themselves. The film has nothing to do with Spider Goats. It is titled Google Spider Goats to showcase just how many disturbing things are going on in America, unnoticed by the mass television-consuming public (i.e. crossing spiders with goats to create bullet-proof vests).

I know we've been down this road before, however take a look at this comment, ignore or post what you agree or disagree on this 47 minute clip on the America we live in today.
Google Spider Goats posted just to be viewed and to comment not to convince one of anything.

Peace
*We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • Google Spider Goats irritates me for a number of reasons ... the "stupid" voice is self-defeating ... that voice is supposed to represent the very people the video should be addressing in earnest ... but instead it actively portrays them as idiots.

    Once again,
    i also think that arguing about exploding buildings is just silly at this point. WTC 7 had a huge scoop out of the side of it (yes you can find pictures of it now) ... and it had some pretty bad fires, probably fueled by a continous flow of generator pump oil ... check out the video on that page which clearly shows fire coming from just about the entire face of WTC7 ... add those up along with the strange load bearing configuration which has a diagonal beam supporting an uncommonly heavy load ... probably traveling right over a hot oil fire ... you get building failure ... and yes ... a failing building would fall down pretty fast ... oh say ... at just about the speed of gravity ...

    and check out this:
    debunking "pull it" and more ...

    i dunno man.
    i'm not saying the government didn't have foreknowledge and deliberately ignored warnings ... but arguing exploding buildings just seems pointless at this point.
    ;)
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • In any event....the debris was confiscated and disposed of faster than you can say "cut me a bunch of perfect 30 foot beams so that they are easy to hall away in a truck will ya..."
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    In any event....the debris was confiscated and disposed of faster than you can say "cut me a bunch of perfect 30 foot beams so that they are easy to hall away in a truck will ya..."

    And didn't all that scrap go to India?

    And then, Lo and Behold, India is suddenly a nuclear energy ally?

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • Google Spider Goats irritates me for a number of reasons ... the "stupid" voice is self-defeating ... that voice is supposed to represent the very people the video should be addressing in earnest ... but instead it actively portrays them as idiots.

    I think the reason they used the cartoon dudes with funny voices was to make it amusing to watch high. hehe
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • spiral outspiral out Posts: 1,052
    Google Spider Goats irritates me for a number of reasons ... the "stupid" voice is self-defeating ... that voice is supposed to represent the very people the video should be addressing in earnest ... but instead it actively portrays them as idiots.

    Once again,
    i also think that arguing about exploding buildings is just silly at this point. WTC 7 had a huge scoop out of the side of it (yes you can find pictures of it now) ... and it had some pretty bad fires, probably fueled by a continous flow of generator pump oil ... check out the video on that page which clearly shows fire coming from just about the entire face of WTC7 ... add those up along with the strange load bearing configuration which has a diagonal beam supporting an uncommonly heavy load ... probably traveling right over a hot oil fire ... you get building failure ... and yes ... a failing building would fall down pretty fast ... oh say ... at just about the speed of gravity ...

    and check out this:
    debunking "pull it" and more ...

    i dunno man.
    i'm not saying the government didn't have foreknowledge and deliberately ignored warnings ... but arguing exploding buildings just seems pointless at this point.
    ;)

    Hmm, as much as i'm with you in that the most i believe is that it was allowed to happen, i still think it really strange that three building fell at free fall speed on that day. That has never happened before.

    But yea arguing about it is pointless now, we will never know because as roland said the evidence was shipped of, and conveniently never allowed to be looked at. Hmmmmmmm, I wonder why?
    Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!

    The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
  • spiral out wrote:
    Hmm, as much as i'm with you in that the most i believe is that it was allowed to happen, i still think it really strange that three building fell at free fall speed on that day. That has never happened before.

    This is a silly analogy,
    but take a stick and sit a 100lb weight on top of it.
    Time the fall from the moment the weight snaps the stick; i bet it is pretty close to free fall.

    What you had in towers 1 & 2 were buildings with a solid 1\3 of the top of the building severed from all support ... where the theorists would have you believe pancake was floor by floor with the weight of one floor crashing on to the floor below it ... instead what you had was the weight of something like 20 or 30 floors falling on the floor below it all at once ... when an object 20-30 times heavier than the weight intended to be supported comes crashing down, the resistance is going to be minimal ... like near freefall minimal... since freefall is, by definition, the rate at which something falls free ...

    ... and i think there are experts who would argue that they did analyze evidence from ground zero ... but that much of the debris was shipped off quickly in order to facilitate the rescue efforts...

    ... and to recover the gold.

    ;)
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • g under pg under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
    "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the state can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie ... The truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the state." --Joseph Goebbels, minister of propaganda in Nazi Germany, 1933-1945

    I reference to what Arron Russo was saying about the facade of "The War On Terror" and what a huge lie it is.

    It's pretty clear at this point that this administration has been very comfortable in telling it's citizenry whatever lies it feels to fit it's agenda...The New World Order. I can't believe anything they put forth, they are just not trustworthy anymore. Will the next administration follow in the same chaos.


    The fraudulence of the "War on Terror," however, is clearly revealed in the pattern of subsequent facts:


    In Afghanistan the state was overthrown instead of apprehending the terrorist. Offers by the Taliban to surrender Osama bin Laden were ignored, and he remains at large to this day.


    In Iraq, when the United States invaded, there were no al Qaeda terrorists at all.


    Both states have been supplied with puppet governments, and both are dotted with permanent U.S. military bases in strategic proximity to their hydrocarbon assets.


    The U.S. embassy nearing completion in Baghdad is comprised of 21 multistory buildings on 104 acres of land. It will house 5,500 diplomats, staff and families. It is ten times larger than any other U.S. embassy in the world, but we have yet to be told why.


    A 2006 National Intelligence Estimate shows the war in Iraq has exacerbated, not diminished, the threat of terrorism since 9/11. If the "War on Terror" is not a deception, it is a disastrously counterproductive failure.


    Today two American and two British oil companies are poised to claim immense profits from 81 percent of Iraq's undeveloped crude oil reserves. They cannot proceed, however, until the Iraqi Parliament enacts a statute known as the "hydrocarbon framework law."


    The features of postwar oil policy so heavily favoring the oil companies were crafted by the Bush administration State Department in 2002, a year before the invasion.


    Drafting of the law itself was begun during Paul Bremer's Coalition Provisional Authority, with the invited participation of a number of major oil companies. The law was written in English and translated into Arabic only when it was due for Iraqi approval.


    President Bush made passage of the hydrocarbon law a mandatory "benchmark" when he announced the troop surge in January of 2007.
    Sept. 11, 2001

    A tectonic groundswell of skepticism, doubt and suspicion has emerged about the Bush administration's official explanation of 9/11. Some claim the administration orchestrated the attacks. Others see complicity. Still others find criminal negligence. The cases they make are neither extreme nor trivial.

    Whatever the truth about 9/11, the Bush administration now had a fortuitous, spectacular opportunity to proceed with its premeditated attacks.

    The administration would have to play its hand skillfully, however.

    Other nations have suffered criminal acts of terrorism, but there is no precedent for conflating the terrorists with the states that harbor them, declaring a "war" and seeking with military force to overthrow a sovereign government. Victimized nations have always relied successfully on international law enforcement and police action to bring terrorists to justice.

    But the Bush administration needed more than this. War plans were in the files. They needed to justify invasions. Only by targeting the "harboring states," as well as the terrorists, did they stand a chance of doing so.

    The administration played its hand brilliantly. It compared the terrorist attacks immediately to Pearl Harbor, and in the smoke and rage of 9/11 the comparison was superficially attractive. But Pearl Harbor was the violent expression of hostile intent by a formidably armed nation, and it introduced four years of full-scale land, sea and airborne combat. 9/11 was al Qaeda's violent expression of hostility: 19 fanatics armed with box cutters. Yes, extraordinary destruction and loss of life, but the physical security of our entire nation was simply not at stake.

    Though the comparison was specious, the "War on Terror" was born, and it has proven to be an exquisite smokescreen. But labeling the preplanned invasions as a "War on Terror" was the mega-lie, dwarfing all the untruths that followed. The mega-lie would be the centerpiece of a masterful propaganda blitz that continues to this day.


    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • spiral outspiral out Posts: 1,052
    This is a silly analogy,
    but take a stick and sit a 100lb weight on top of it.
    Time the fall from the moment the weight snaps the stick; i bet it is pretty close to free fall.

    What you had in towers 1 & 2 were buildings with a solid 1\3 of the top of the building severed from all support ... where the theorists would have you believe pancake was floor by floor with the weight of one floor crashing on to the floor below it ... instead what you had was the weight of something like 20 or 30 floors falling on the floor below it all at once ... when an object 20-30 times heavier than the weight intended to be supported comes crashing down, the resistance is going to be minimal ... like near freefall minimal... since freefall is, by definition, the rate at which something falls free ...

    ... and i think there are experts who would argue that they did analyze evidence from ground zero ... but that much of the debris was shipped off quickly in order to facilitate the rescue efforts...

    ... and to recover the gold.

    ;)

    Ok, well i still think they fell to neatly, they would have at least swayed had it been due to support beams failing as the planes severed some but not all of them. So when the rest failed surely it would have tiped to one side even if it did cause the whole builing to collapse.

    And that is especially true for building 7 as no planes hit it and all the damage sustained was to one particular side of the building, so again you would think if the building collapsed it would collapse first from the damaged side not from the middle.

    It just doesn't sit right with me, and i would love for NIST to carry out furthur tests as they haven't come up with a good enough reason yet for the collapse.

    And they could have shipped the wreckage to somewhere in America for it to be analized for years to come. That to me is to dodgy, some could argue stupidity but i don't think thats the case at all.
    Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!

    The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
  • spiral out wrote:
    Ok, well i still think they fell to neatly, they would have at least swayed had it been due to support beams failing as the planes severed some but not all of them. So when the rest failed surely it would have tiped to one side even if it did cause the whole builing to collapse.

    And that is especially true for building 7 as no planes hit it and all the damage sustained was to one particular side of the building, so again you would think if the building collapsed it would collapse first from the damaged side not from the middle.

    It just doesn't sit right with me, and i would love for NIST to carry out furthur tests as they haven't come up with a good enough reason yet for the collapse.

    And they could have shipped the wreckage to somewhere in America for it to be analized for years to come. That to me is to dodgy, some could argue stupidity but i don't think thats the case at all.

    When something weighing however many thousands of tons that the main towers weighed comes crashing down from structural weakinging ... chances are that is just how it is going to come ... DOWN ...

    remember, the portion above the hole was still basicaly a single mass ... connected by it's outer frame supports (part of the reason the building came down, it had support "columns" on the outside face) ... but anyhow ...

    ... as for Building 7 ... read some of what is on those two links i posted for you ...

    the raging fire ... and it WAS raging ... that you see on one of those floors is on the OPPOSITE corner of the hole in the building ... and why would IT come straight down?

    well did we not just discuss the ackward construction of WTC 7 ... it was built over a electrical substation with few supports below like the 14th floor or such ... so instead it had this massive crossing column that ran diaganol across the length of it ... if that fire was heating up a piece of that crossing column, there is good reason to expect it to come straight down ... you have just removed a massive amount of support for the buildings weight, across the length of the entire building ... make sense?
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • spiral outspiral out Posts: 1,052
    When something weighing however many thousands of tons that the main towers weighed comes crashing down from structural weakinging ... chances are that is just how it is going to come ... DOWN ...

    remember, the portion above the hole was still basicaly a single mass ... connected by it's outer frame supports (part of the reason the building came down, it had support "columns" on the outside face) ... but anyhow ...

    ... as for Building 7 ... read some of what is on those two links i posted for you ...

    the raging fire ... and it WAS raging ... that you see on one of those floors is on the OPPOSITE corner of the hole in the building ... and why would IT come straight down?

    well did we not just discuss the ackward construction of WTC 7 ... it was built over a electrical substation with few supports below like the 14th floor or such ... so instead it had this massive crossing column that ran diaganol across the length of it ... if that fire was heating up a piece of that crossing column, there is good reason to expect it to come straight down ... you have just removed a massive amount of support for the buildings weight, across the length of the entire building ... make sense?


    All offical reports are inconclusive on all three collapses, so i'm holding out believing one thing over another.

    Tell me, what do you think of the fact that the BBC reported the collapse of building 7 before it happened and what are your thought's on why they shipped of the rubble instead of keeping it so they could get a clear picture on why they collapsed.

    There are just to many odd occurrences that happened on that day.
    Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!

    The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
  • g under pg under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
    Question to the masses.....Like Aaron Russo was saying do you think this "The War On Terror"
    will ever fade by the end of this century or this war is a endless fight and given whatever resources it needs???

    As far as I can see this is a war that cannot be won but more about something that can be perpetuated for generations to come, if we ever get that far.

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • spiral outspiral out Posts: 1,052
    g under p wrote:
    Question to the masses.....Like Aaron Russo was saying do you think this "The War On Terror"
    will ever fade by the end of this century or this war is a endless fight and given whatever resources it needs???

    As far as I can see this is a war that cannot be won but more about something that can be perpetuated for generations to come, if we ever get that far.

    Peace

    It's the war from 1984 it will continue just moving from country to country at the end of the day it's the tax payer who pays.
    Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!

    The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
  • 810wmb810wmb Posts: 849
    bert and ernie blew the suckers up
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
Sign In or Register to comment.