al-qaeda started fires?

2»

Comments

  • NMyTreeNMyTree Posts: 2,374
    Let me guess, these particular al-qaeda operatives were all from .......Iran.


    I heard a rumor....just a rumor, that it was four Blackwater soldiers dressed in a stunning Shora and colorful Egal. Simply lovely.
  • even flow?even flow? Posts: 8,066
    810wmb wrote:
    http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2003-07-11-alqaeda-fire_x.htm


    also drudge is running the headline -

    CBS News has learned U.S. officials will officially declare California's Santiago Fire an arson and offer a $50,000 reward to find the arsonist... Developing...


    Time to check my tinfoil stocks!
    You've changed your place in this world!
  • Solat13Solat13 Posts: 6,996
    810wmb wrote:
    http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2003-07-11-alqaeda-fire_x.htm


    also drudge is running the headline -

    CBS News has learned U.S. officials will officially declare California's Santiago Fire an arson and offer a $50,000 reward to find the arsonist... Developing...

    You do realize that story from the USA Today was from July 11, 2003 right?

    I don't think anyone in any official capacity is blaming terrorism on these fires.
    - Busted down the pretext
    - 8/28/98
    - 9/2/00
    - 4/28/03, 5/3/03, 7/3/03, 7/5/03, 7/6/03, 7/9/03, 7/11/03, 7/12/03, 7/14/03
    - 9/28/04, 9/29/04, 10/1/04, 10/2/04
    - 9/11/05, 9/12/05, 9/13/05, 9/30/05, 10/1/05, 10/3/05
    - 5/12/06, 5/13/06, 5/27/06, 5/28/06, 5/30/06, 6/1/06, 6/3/06, 6/23/06, 7/22/06, 7/23/06, 12/2/06, 12/9/06
    - 8/2/07, 8/5/07
    - 6/19/08, 6/20/08, 6/22/08, 6/24/08, 6/25/08, 6/27/08, 6/28/08, 6/30/08, 7/1/08
    - 8/23/09, 8/24/09, 9/21/09, 9/22/09, 10/27/09, 10/28/09, 10/30/09, 10/31/09
    - 5/15/10, 5/17/10, 5/18/10, 5/20/10, 5/21/10, 10/23/10, 10/24/10
    - 9/11/11, 9/12/11
    - 10/18/13, 10/21/13, 10/22/13, 11/30/13, 12/4/13
  • 810wmb810wmb Posts: 849
    Solat13 wrote:
    You do realize that story from the USA Today was from July 11, 2003 right?

    I don't think anyone in any official capacity is blaming terrorism on these fires.

    i do realize that - drudge brought it up because it had been talked about...it was under "flashback" or something like that
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    810wmb wrote:
    it's helping..

    how so...?
  • 810wmb810wmb Posts: 849
    inmytree wrote:
    how so...?

    as far as attacks here...but it will happen again
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    810wmb wrote:
    as far as attacks here...but it will happen again

    if "it" will happen again, I have to ask, again, how is the war in Irak helping...?

    If "it" is going to happen, wouldn't our time and resources be better spent in securing our nation...?
  • 810wmb810wmb Posts: 849
    inmytree wrote:
    if "it" will happen again, I have to ask, again, how is the war in Irak helping...?

    If "it" is going to happen, wouldn't our time and resources be better spent in securing our nation...?

    look, i follow you...

    but the fact that we haven't since 9/11 means something. i only think we will because it's almost impossible to stop people when they are hell bent on doing something.

    i agree about securing our nation...but if you just search middle easterners at airports it's profiling. so you gotta search grandma too. if you build a fence at the border, it's too harsh or inhumane. if you deport illegals, we're shits...when by their very definition, they should be gone. if you clap down on airports like israel, people will go nutty.

    americans want it both ways, it ain't gonna happen
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    810wmb wrote:
    look, i follow you...

    but the fact that we haven't since 9/11 means something. i only think we will because it's almost impossible to stop people when they are hell bent on doing something.

    i agree about securing our nation...but if you just search middle easterners at airports it's profiling. so you gotta search grandma too. if you build a fence at the border, it's too harsh or inhumane. if you deport illegals, we're shits...when by their very definition, they should be gone. if you clap down on airports like israel, people will go nutty.

    americans want it both ways, it ain't gonna happen

    I follow you, as well....but you're talking about several different things...many of which have nothing to do with the notion of "fighting them there blah, blah, blah"....

    for me, the occupation of Irak is hurting our efforts to keep the US safe...and since you and many others seem to feel another attack can not be stopped, the belief that the efforts in Irak is keeping us safe is just plain wrong...
  • 810wmb810wmb Posts: 849
    inmytree wrote:
    I follow you, as well....but you're talking about several different things...many of which have nothing to do with the notion of "fighting them there blah, blah, blah"....

    for me, the occupation of Irak is hurting our efforts to keep the US safe...and since you and many others seem to feel another attack can not be stopped, the belief that the efforts in Irak is keeping us safe is just plain wrong...

    whatever you believe is fine by me, i disagree

    edit - i'm not talking several different things...to secure the nation you have to do stuff....waterways, airports, borders etc.

    how about some fighter jets next to our nuke plants? tanks by our damns? when we try to do something, all this shit pops up. either do it or don't...we ain't
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    810wmb wrote:
    whatever you believe is fine by me, i disagree

    edit - i'm not talking several different things...to secure the nation you have to do stuff....waterways, airports, borders etc.

    how about some fighter jets next to our nuke plants? tanks by our damns? when we try to do something, all this shit pops up. either do it or don't...we ain't

    you can disagree all day long...but he fact is you can not show any proof the occupation is keeping us safe...a fact you choose to ignore...
  • 810wmb810wmb Posts: 849
    inmytree wrote:
    you can disagree all day long...but he fact is you can not show any proof the occupation is keeping us safe...a fact you choose to ignore...


    same to you...prove that is has made us unsafer here.

    the fact that we have been hit again so far is proof enough.

    but if and when it happens again, you'll be the first to say, "see, it hasn't helped" bush should have done more....but everything we try to do, the libs find something wrong with it.

    sometimes, you go bomb some bitches
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    810wmb wrote:
    same to you...prove that is has made us unsafer here.

    the fact that we have been hit again so far is proof enough.

    but if and when it happens again, you'll be the first to say, "see, it hasn't helped" bush should have done more....but everything we try to do, the libs find something wrong with it.

    sometimes, you go bomb some bitches

    umm...you're the one saying "it" will happen again...not me...try to keep it straight...

    furthermore, you're one saying the occupation is "helping", yet you offer nothing...

    all I know is, someone said Al-qaeada started the California fires...which means the occupation is not keeping us safe...
  • 810wmb810wmb Posts: 849
    inmytree wrote:
    umm...you're the one saying "it" will happen again...not me...try to keep it straight...

    furthermore, you're one saying the occupation is "helping", yet you offer nothing...

    all I know is, someone said Al-qaeada started the California fires...which means the occupation is not keeping us safe...

    i'm straight - i explained why i thought it was working

    no one said they started the fires, but you proved my point...if and when it does happen, it's bush's fault
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    810wmb wrote:
    i'm straight - i explained why i thought it was working

    no one said they started the fires, but you proved my point...if and when it does happen, it's bush's fault

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Px_mEucuaw&eurl=http://www.newshounds.us/2007/10/24/fox_and_friends_arson_somehow_worse_if_linked_to_al_qaeda.php

    ha ha ha...where did I say it was "bush's fault"....? let me us small words for you:

    the

    occupation

    is

    not

    keeping

    the

    US

    Safe....

    :)
  • 810wmb810wmb Posts: 849
    inmytree wrote:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Px_mEucuaw&eurl=http://www.newshounds.us/2007/10/24/fox_and_friends_arson_somehow_worse_if_linked_to_al_qaeda.php

    ha ha ha...where did I say it was "bush's fault"....? let me us small words for you:

    the

    occupation

    is

    not

    keeping

    the

    US

    Safe....

    :)

    it's hard to read when you type down like that...

    where's yr proof that we are not safer?
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    810wmb wrote:
    it's hard to read when you type down like that...

    where's yr proof that we are not safer?

    you told me...
    you wrote:
    they have already been here...but they haven't struck again yet....and they will

    and
    you wrote:
    as far as attacks here...but it will happen again
  • 810wmb810wmb Posts: 849
    810wmb wrote:
    i only think we will because it's almost impossible to stop people when they are hell bent on doing something.

    left that part out
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    810wmb wrote:
    left that part out


    I feel like I'm in some sort of Abbott and Costello routine...

    Who's on First...?

    (some old timers may get the reference...)
  • flywallyflyflywallyfly Posts: 1,453
    Damn those Al Qaueda bastardos ! I heard they have a new plot to use hundreds of water hoses to create a mudslide weapon.
  • 810wmb810wmb Posts: 849
    inmytree wrote:
    I feel like I'm in some sort of Abbott and Costello routine...

    Who's on First...?

    (some old timers may get the reference...)

    3rd base, dude
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    it is called mother nature folks... and this is her natural way of replinishing herself
  • NMyTreeNMyTree Posts: 2,374
    inmytree wrote:
    I feel like I'm in some sort of Abbott and Costello routine...

    Who's on First...?

    (some old timers may get the reference...)

    No, I'm on third.:D
Sign In or Register to comment.