Time Mag....commie lovers

810wmb810wmb Posts: 849
edited December 2007 in A Moving Train
they take so many left turns they go in a circle


http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/personoftheyear/
i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • darkcrowdarkcrow Posts: 1,102
    http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/personoftheyear/article/0,28804,1690753_1690757_1696150,00.html

    In a year when Al Gore won the Nobel Peace Prize and green became the new red, white and blue; when the combat in Iraq showed signs of cooling but Baghdad's politicians showed no signs of statesmanship; when China, the rising superpower, juggled its pride in hosting next summer's Olympic Games with its embarrassment at shipping toxic toys around the world; and when J.K. Rowling set millions of minds and hearts on fire with the final volume of her 17-year saga—one nation that had fallen off our mental map, led by one steely and determined man, emerged as a critical linchpin of the 21st century.

    Russia lives in history—and history lives in Russia. Throughout much of the 20th century, the Soviet Union cast an ominous shadow over the world. It was the U.S.'s dark twin. But after the fall of the Berlin Wall, Russia receded from the American consciousness as we became mired in our own polarized politics. And it lost its place in the great game of geopolitics, its significance dwarfed not just by the U.S. but also by the rising giants of China and India. That view was always naive. Russia is central to our world—and the new world that is being born. It is the largest country on earth; it shares a 2,600-mile (4,200 km) border with China; it has a significant and restive Islamic population; it has the world's largest stockpile of weapons of mass destruction and a lethal nuclear arsenal; it is the world's second largest oil producer after Saudi Arabia; and it is an indispensable player in whatever happens in the Middle East. For all these reasons, if Russia fails, all bets are off for the 21st century. And if Russia succeeds as a nation-state in the family of nations, it will owe much of that success to one man, Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin.

    No one would label Putin a child of destiny. The only surviving son of a Leningrad factory worker, he was born after what the Russians call the Great Patriotic War, in which they lost more than 26 million people. The only evidence that fate played a part in Putin's story comes from his grandfather's job: he cooked for Joseph Stalin, the dictator who inflicted ungodly terrors on his nation.

    When this intense and brooding KGB agent took over as President of Russia in 2000, he found a country on the verge of becoming a failed state. With dauntless persistence, a sharp vision of what Russia should become and a sense that he embodied the spirit of Mother Russia, Putin has put his country back on the map. And he intends to redraw it himself. Though he will step down as Russia's President in March, he will continue to lead his country as its Prime Minister and attempt to transform it into a new kind of nation, beholden to neither East nor West.

    TIME's Person of the Year is not and never has been an honor. It is not an endorsement. It is not a popularity contest. At its best, it is a clear-eyed recognition of the world as it is and of the most powerful individuals and forces shaping that world—for better or for worse. It is ultimately about leadership—bold, earth-changing leadership. Putin is not a boy scout. He is not a democrat in any way that the West would define it. He is not a paragon of free speech. He stands, above all, for stability—stability before freedom, stability before choice, stability in a country that has hardly seen it for a hundred years. Whether he becomes more like the man for whom his grandfather prepared blinis—who himself was twice TIME's Person of the Year—or like Peter the Great, the historical figure he most admires; whether he proves to be a reformer or an autocrat who takes Russia back to an era of repression—this we will know only over the next decade. At significant cost to the principles and ideas that free nations prize, he has performed an extraordinary feat of leadership in imposing stability on a nation that has rarely known it and brought Russia back to the table of world power. For that reason, Vladimir Putin is TIME's 2007 Person of the Year.
  • 810wmb810wmb Posts: 849
    ummm, like i said, commie lovers
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • darkcrowdarkcrow Posts: 1,102
    darkcrow wrote:
    TIME's Person of the Year is not and never has been an honor. It is not an endorsement. It is not a popularity contest. At its best, it is a clear-eyed recognition of the world as it is and of the most powerful individuals and forces shaping that world—for better or for worse. It is ultimately about leadership—bold, earth-changing leadership.
    message too short yada yada
  • 810wmb wrote:
    ummm, like i said, commie lovers

    This might be a dumb question, but do you even read?
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • Uncle LeoUncle Leo Posts: 1,059
    Hitler was named Man* of the Year. People were up in arms. That is all you need to remember about the lesson that this is a distinction. It's about influence-positive or negative. They did not love Hitler and they do not love Putin.

    *Hitler won "MAN of the Year." Putin won "PERSON of the Year." So once you accept that this distinction is not an award, or endorsement, at least you can still whine about the political correctnes of the change from "man" to "person."
    I cannot come up with a new sig till I get this egg off my face.
  • tybirdtybird Posts: 17,388
    I don't really think that Putin is a commy....maybe a Stalinist. :confused:
    All the world will be your enemy, Prince with a thousand enemies, and whenever they catch you, they will kill you. But first they must catch you, digger, listener, runner, prince with the swift warning. Be cunning and full of tricks and your people shall never be destroyed.
  • KannKann Posts: 1,146
    Putin is not a communist. Not even close to one.
    And I'm not even talking about Al Gore or JK Rowling!
    Even Hu Jintao is no communist (though he still has the name).
  • Petraeus the runner up is really a communist?... now I really, really, really, don't like Bush...(before it was just two really's)

    No Really. Ok I've said really too much now.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • smarcheesmarchee Windsor, Ontario Posts: 14,539
    I find it amusing in your country that if a media organization doesn't agree with some sort of right-wing agenda or phiolosphy, they are almost always problems left or communist.

    If someone claims Time Magazine supports Communism or if left-wing, wow, they must be delusional.
    1998 ~ Barrie
    2003 ~ Toronto
    2005 ~ London, Toronto
    2006 ~ Toronto
    2008 ~ Hartford, Mansfied I,
    2009 ~ Toronto, Chicago I, Chicago II
    2010 ~ Cleveland, Buffalo
    2011 ~ Toronto I, Toronto II, Ottawa, Hamilton
    2013 - London, Pittsburgh, Buffalo
    2014 - Detroit
    2019 - Chicago X 2
  • 810wmb810wmb Posts: 849
    This might be a dumb question, but do you even read?

    they can say whatever type of crap they want to about the "why" it doesn't change the fact...
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • 810wmb wrote:
    they can say whatever type of crap they want to about the "why" it doesn't change the fact...

    What fact? you don't even make sense...

    Did you call them commie lovers when they picked George Bush (both of them), Kenneth Starr, the American Soldier, Rudy Giuliani, Newt Gingrich or Regan (twice)?
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • 810wmb wrote:
    they can say whatever type of crap they want to about the "why" it doesn't change the fact...

    And by "fact" you mean the utter shit you've made up in your own head.
    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmgphotos/sets/72157600802942672/">My Pearl Jam Photos</a>

    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmgphotos/4731512142/&quot; title="PJ Banner2 by Mister J Photography, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1135/4731512142_258f2d6ab4_b.jpg&quot; width="630" height="112" alt="PJ Banner2" /></a>
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    810wmb wrote:
    ummm, like i said, commie lovers


    what year are you living in jackass? time to pick up a book
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    What fact? you don't even make sense...

    Did you call them commie lovers when they picked George Bush (both of them), Kenneth Starr, the American Soldier, Rudy Giuliani, Newt Gingrich or Regan (twice)?


    he is obviously uneducated to the point of scared arrogance
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    810wmb wrote:
    they take so many left turns they go in a circle


    http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/personoftheyear/


    also you seem to be the type of person that owns alot of weapons, but is to overweight and slow to use them



    this is based on many of your posts
  • 810wmb810wmb Posts: 849
    macgyver06 wrote:
    also you seem to be the type of person that owns alot of weapons, but is to overweight and slow to use them



    this is based on many of your posts

    you seem to talk a lot of bullshit...a little greasy weasel, pointy smelly teeth, eyes like piss holes in a snowbank...

    come see how slow i am with my weapons...
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • even flow?even flow? Posts: 8,066
    Well at least Time keeps with the times. They had Hitler on their when he was in his prime. Must have been a Nazi rag at that point eh 810? My personal fave was 1988 but somebody like you still dosen't see the problem. Yeah, go and look up 88 before you comment, it will help.

    They have had American liars thanx to Nixon, assholes who okayed nuking another country, your boie Bush-twice :eek:! Must be a left leaning rag for them to have Bush in there, eh? Do your homework boy!!!
    You've changed your place in this world!
Sign In or Register to comment.