9/11 DEW / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline
CB_Brooklyn
Posts: 16
9/11 Directed Energy Weapon / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline
By CB_Brooklyn
Lenin, the first Communist dictator after the takeover of Russia in 1917, is widely credited with the following quotation, "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."
There are three basic versions of the 9/11 events. Although differences and/or overlapping may occur, the following three versions generally describe what most people believe:
1. OGCT. This is known as the “Official Government Conspiracy Theory”. This version states that a guy from a cave in Afghanistan conspired with 19 boxcutter-wielding Muslims to hijack airplanes, outwit the USA’s entire multi-trillion dollar defense system, and cause the Twin Towers to collapse. This is the version pushed by the government and media as being the truth of 9/11.
2. APCT. I call this the “Alternate Propaganda Conspiracy Theory”. This version states that, more or less, there were hijackings on 9/11, but the planes might have been taken under remote control to ensure they crashed as planned. Airplanes most likely crashed at the Pentagon and Shanksville, but planes definitely did crash into the Twin Towers. The Twin Towers and WTC 7 collapsed from conventional explosives and thermite, and molten metal was found in the rubble. This is the version pushed by the government and media as being the “wacko conspiracy theory” that the “truth movement” believes.
3. REAL. This, simply, is the REAL version, backed by actual evidence, Laws of Physics, and common sense: There were no hijackings, no plane crashes, the corporate media broadcasted cartoons of an airplane impacting the South Tower, and the WTC complex (not just the Towers and WTC 7) was destroyed with Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). The government and media steer clear of these.
Refer to the Lenin-credited quote above.
Is it possible the “truth movement” has been run by the 9/11 perpetrators since day one?
Is it possible that certain individuals have been planted to steer the “truth movement” away from the perpetrators? Is it possible these plants have affiliations with directed energy weapons (DEW)?
Is it even possible that some of these plants are “in on it” while others got suckered in? You be the judge.
***Former Transportation Secretary, Norman Mineta, has ties to the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS).
Mineta was Vice President of Lockheed Martin, a sponsor of DEPS.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Mineta
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html
Mineta ensured minimal interference with the DEW by grounding as many commercial airliners as possible during the timeframe of the towers’ destruction.
Mineta steered the “truth movement” toward hijackings and plane crashes by spreading the “Cheney stand down order” hoax.
http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/hearing2/9-11Commission_Hearing_2003-05-23.htm
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3722436852417384871
***Former BYU physics professor, Steven Jones, has done research at Los Alamos where directed energy weapons are researched.
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/atomic/physics1/atomic/jones_cv.htm
Jones steered the “truth movement” toward thermite/conventional explosives/molten metal theories. Jones’ molten metal evidence has been shown to be fabricated.
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=91&Itemid=60
Jones ridicules the directed energy weapon and TV-Fakery theories with statements such as ”These two are noted for their no-planes-hit-the-Towers theories and for promoting the notion of ray-beams from space knocking down the Towers.”
http://judicial-inc.biz/Steven_Jones_quits_911.htm
***Physicist Greg Jenkins’ has connections to the NSA and DEW:
"This work was supported in part by NSF grant DMR-9705129 and by funding from the NSA."
http://www.physics.buffalo.edu/cerne/reprints/ybco_prl.pdf
Jenkins’ papers were listed in an annual report which also listed at least one manufacturer of directed energy weapons (Rockwell).
http://www.csr.umd.edu/csrpage/publications/Annual%20Report/annualreport.pdf
http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/asat-overview.htm
Jenkins steered the “truth movement” away from directed energy weapons by conducting an ambush interview of Dr Judy Wood. (However, a read of the transcript reveals Dr Wood won the debate hands down.)
http://drjudywood.com/articles/transcript/Jenkins_transcript.html
***Official at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Van Romero, has ties to the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS).
Romero participated in events at DEPS before and after 9/11.
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/DEMSconf03.html
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/EduWksp00.html
Romero steered the “truth movement” toward standard controlled demolition by stating "It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in strategic points"
http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/retractions/romero.html
Romero is a controlled demolitions expert. Scroll down a little and note the photo. Does Romero actually think this was caused by a “relatively small amount of explosives”?
***Former Director of the Star Wars program, Robert Bowman, is about as close to directed energy weapons as one can get.
Bowman steered the “truth movement” toward hijackings, and NORAD standing down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5gio_iR2WE
Although he is in Jim Fetzer’s Scholars group, I have not heard him speaking about Dr Wood’s DEW evidence. I do remember, however, an interview where Bowman states that he “doesn’t fall for conspiracy theories” with regard to controlled demolition.
Bowman has a PhD in Nuclear Engineering. How can he possibly call this a conspiracy theory?
Also of note is the following:
The government contracted with several sponsors of the Directed Energy Professional Society for the NIST (NCSTAR 1) Report:
Boeing - Gold Level Current/Founding Sponsor
Applied Research Associates (ARA) - Silver Level Founding Sponsor
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) - Silver Level Current Sponsor
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html
Dr Judy Wood has discovered that ARA and SAIC are manufacturers of Directed Energy Weapons and have expertise in Psychological Operations (PSYOPS).
http://drjudywood.com/articles/ARA/ARA.html
Dr Wood also discovered two images on ARA’s website that are similar to the World Trade Center. She details this in her Appeal to NIST’s denial of her Request for Correction.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/apics/Appeal_03.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/apics/Appeal_04.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_WoodAppeal.html
The New York Times is a mainstream media source. Do they tell the truth of 9/11 or do they hide it? Why on earth would they help the “truth movement” by publishing evidence of explosives?
The New York Times steered the “truth movement” towards explosives demolitions by publishing the WTC Task Force Interviews.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/met_WTC_histories_full_01.html
However, they redacted evidence for Directed Energy Weapons.
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/02/911-rescuer-saw-explosions-inside-wtc.html
Who's Popular On Corporate Media? Who's Not?
*William Rodriguez - publicly speaks up against DEW / TV-Fakery
http://www.911researchers.com/node/555#comment-4089
*David Ray Griffin - pro Global Government (aka New World Order)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-TZypcH9eg
*Steven Jones - pro explosives-demolition, pro thermite, pro molten metal
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayYXNo0i_Cs
*Kevin Barrett - supports Steven Jones
http://drjudywood.com/articles/a/KB/Barrett_Kevin.html
*Robert Bowman - expert on NORAD’s jet-scrambling procedures
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5gio_iR2WE
*Judy Wood - never invited to discuss the DEW evidence, despite her filing of an actual court case
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html
*Morgan Reynolds - never invited back after discussing TV-Fakery on FOX News
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reQZT9Hzvt8
Reynolds also filed a court case
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=federal_case
*Jerry Leaphart - mainstream attorney never invited to discuss his clients’ (Wood/Reynolds) 9/11 legal actions
In an interview with Kevin Barrett, trial attorney Jerry Leaphart has said:
"What I can tell you and the listeners, Kevin, is this. There is more admissible evidence associated with the theory that the World Trade Center was destroyed by directed energy weapons than there is admissible evidence for any single other theory out there that has been promulgated."
MP3 Clip: http://drjudywood.com/media/070727_JerryLeaphartRFC_Adm.mp3
Full Show: http://drjudywood.com/media/070727_JerryLeaphartRFCs.mp3
============================================
============================================
============================================
The following is a timeline relating to promotion of the Alternate Propaganda Conspiracy Theory by government plants and the media, and suppression of the REAL version by government plants and media. Also included is suppression of free energy research.
Continued here:
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=151&Itemid=60
By CB_Brooklyn
Lenin, the first Communist dictator after the takeover of Russia in 1917, is widely credited with the following quotation, "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."
There are three basic versions of the 9/11 events. Although differences and/or overlapping may occur, the following three versions generally describe what most people believe:
1. OGCT. This is known as the “Official Government Conspiracy Theory”. This version states that a guy from a cave in Afghanistan conspired with 19 boxcutter-wielding Muslims to hijack airplanes, outwit the USA’s entire multi-trillion dollar defense system, and cause the Twin Towers to collapse. This is the version pushed by the government and media as being the truth of 9/11.
2. APCT. I call this the “Alternate Propaganda Conspiracy Theory”. This version states that, more or less, there were hijackings on 9/11, but the planes might have been taken under remote control to ensure they crashed as planned. Airplanes most likely crashed at the Pentagon and Shanksville, but planes definitely did crash into the Twin Towers. The Twin Towers and WTC 7 collapsed from conventional explosives and thermite, and molten metal was found in the rubble. This is the version pushed by the government and media as being the “wacko conspiracy theory” that the “truth movement” believes.
3. REAL. This, simply, is the REAL version, backed by actual evidence, Laws of Physics, and common sense: There were no hijackings, no plane crashes, the corporate media broadcasted cartoons of an airplane impacting the South Tower, and the WTC complex (not just the Towers and WTC 7) was destroyed with Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). The government and media steer clear of these.
Refer to the Lenin-credited quote above.
Is it possible the “truth movement” has been run by the 9/11 perpetrators since day one?
Is it possible that certain individuals have been planted to steer the “truth movement” away from the perpetrators? Is it possible these plants have affiliations with directed energy weapons (DEW)?
Is it even possible that some of these plants are “in on it” while others got suckered in? You be the judge.
***Former Transportation Secretary, Norman Mineta, has ties to the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS).
Mineta was Vice President of Lockheed Martin, a sponsor of DEPS.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Mineta
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html
Mineta ensured minimal interference with the DEW by grounding as many commercial airliners as possible during the timeframe of the towers’ destruction.
Mineta steered the “truth movement” toward hijackings and plane crashes by spreading the “Cheney stand down order” hoax.
http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/hearing2/9-11Commission_Hearing_2003-05-23.htm
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3722436852417384871
***Former BYU physics professor, Steven Jones, has done research at Los Alamos where directed energy weapons are researched.
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/atomic/physics1/atomic/jones_cv.htm
Jones steered the “truth movement” toward thermite/conventional explosives/molten metal theories. Jones’ molten metal evidence has been shown to be fabricated.
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=91&Itemid=60
Jones ridicules the directed energy weapon and TV-Fakery theories with statements such as ”These two are noted for their no-planes-hit-the-Towers theories and for promoting the notion of ray-beams from space knocking down the Towers.”
http://judicial-inc.biz/Steven_Jones_quits_911.htm
***Physicist Greg Jenkins’ has connections to the NSA and DEW:
"This work was supported in part by NSF grant DMR-9705129 and by funding from the NSA."
http://www.physics.buffalo.edu/cerne/reprints/ybco_prl.pdf
Jenkins’ papers were listed in an annual report which also listed at least one manufacturer of directed energy weapons (Rockwell).
http://www.csr.umd.edu/csrpage/publications/Annual%20Report/annualreport.pdf
http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/asat-overview.htm
Jenkins steered the “truth movement” away from directed energy weapons by conducting an ambush interview of Dr Judy Wood. (However, a read of the transcript reveals Dr Wood won the debate hands down.)
http://drjudywood.com/articles/transcript/Jenkins_transcript.html
***Official at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Van Romero, has ties to the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS).
Romero participated in events at DEPS before and after 9/11.
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/DEMSconf03.html
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/EduWksp00.html
Romero steered the “truth movement” toward standard controlled demolition by stating "It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in strategic points"
http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/retractions/romero.html
Romero is a controlled demolitions expert. Scroll down a little and note the photo. Does Romero actually think this was caused by a “relatively small amount of explosives”?
***Former Director of the Star Wars program, Robert Bowman, is about as close to directed energy weapons as one can get.
Bowman steered the “truth movement” toward hijackings, and NORAD standing down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5gio_iR2WE
Although he is in Jim Fetzer’s Scholars group, I have not heard him speaking about Dr Wood’s DEW evidence. I do remember, however, an interview where Bowman states that he “doesn’t fall for conspiracy theories” with regard to controlled demolition.
Bowman has a PhD in Nuclear Engineering. How can he possibly call this a conspiracy theory?
Also of note is the following:
The government contracted with several sponsors of the Directed Energy Professional Society for the NIST (NCSTAR 1) Report:
Boeing - Gold Level Current/Founding Sponsor
Applied Research Associates (ARA) - Silver Level Founding Sponsor
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) - Silver Level Current Sponsor
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html
Dr Judy Wood has discovered that ARA and SAIC are manufacturers of Directed Energy Weapons and have expertise in Psychological Operations (PSYOPS).
http://drjudywood.com/articles/ARA/ARA.html
Dr Wood also discovered two images on ARA’s website that are similar to the World Trade Center. She details this in her Appeal to NIST’s denial of her Request for Correction.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/apics/Appeal_03.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/apics/Appeal_04.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_WoodAppeal.html
The New York Times is a mainstream media source. Do they tell the truth of 9/11 or do they hide it? Why on earth would they help the “truth movement” by publishing evidence of explosives?
The New York Times steered the “truth movement” towards explosives demolitions by publishing the WTC Task Force Interviews.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/met_WTC_histories_full_01.html
However, they redacted evidence for Directed Energy Weapons.
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/02/911-rescuer-saw-explosions-inside-wtc.html
Who's Popular On Corporate Media? Who's Not?
*William Rodriguez - publicly speaks up against DEW / TV-Fakery
http://www.911researchers.com/node/555#comment-4089
*David Ray Griffin - pro Global Government (aka New World Order)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-TZypcH9eg
*Steven Jones - pro explosives-demolition, pro thermite, pro molten metal
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayYXNo0i_Cs
*Kevin Barrett - supports Steven Jones
http://drjudywood.com/articles/a/KB/Barrett_Kevin.html
*Robert Bowman - expert on NORAD’s jet-scrambling procedures
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5gio_iR2WE
*Judy Wood - never invited to discuss the DEW evidence, despite her filing of an actual court case
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html
*Morgan Reynolds - never invited back after discussing TV-Fakery on FOX News
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reQZT9Hzvt8
Reynolds also filed a court case
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=federal_case
*Jerry Leaphart - mainstream attorney never invited to discuss his clients’ (Wood/Reynolds) 9/11 legal actions
In an interview with Kevin Barrett, trial attorney Jerry Leaphart has said:
"What I can tell you and the listeners, Kevin, is this. There is more admissible evidence associated with the theory that the World Trade Center was destroyed by directed energy weapons than there is admissible evidence for any single other theory out there that has been promulgated."
MP3 Clip: http://drjudywood.com/media/070727_JerryLeaphartRFC_Adm.mp3
Full Show: http://drjudywood.com/media/070727_JerryLeaphartRFCs.mp3
============================================
============================================
============================================
The following is a timeline relating to promotion of the Alternate Propaganda Conspiracy Theory by government plants and the media, and suppression of the REAL version by government plants and media. Also included is suppression of free energy research.
Continued here:
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=151&Itemid=60
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
I knew i should have taken the blue pill.
Just eat a bunch of Kisses and form your hat from the wrappers, thats what I did.
You got to spend it all
what about all the civilians who caught it on camera?
~Ron Burgundy
Those camera images were simply created on post-it-notes one page at a time, and then flipped really fast in front of a bunch of different cameras in order to fool the mindless sheeples who would later absorb the propoganda in front of their sin boxes...while then dozing off and realizing that the real reason they hate hillary clinton is because she's a G-I-R-L!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
High Traffic ART EZI FTJ JSR KPA PCD SYN ULX VLB YHF
Low Traffic CIO MIW
Non Traffic ABC BAY FDU GBZ HNC NDP OEM ROV TMS ZWL
look, i'm one of the biggest 9/11 skeptics around, but.. cartoons?? this is the kind of stuff that discredits the whole 9/11 truth movement, and sounds like something the controlled opposition you speak of would disseminate.
thank you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i pooped my pants!
come on, you cant be fucking serious with this shit right here
cartoons?
maybe you overlooked all the people that eye witnessed the plane hitting the tower? it was only the tallest building in the friggin country, with everyone from NY/NJ that had a view watching
you discredit everything you say, wit that one silly little line
jackass
exactly... i immediately questioned the reason for that statement... it is so obviously insane that it is fishy at best
Are you mad? Did you read what you wrote? Do you know what common sense is?
Don't bother.
My guess is this thread right here actualy IS the controlled oposition.
That or this guy is just honestly clueless, and posting controlled oposition crap that he found elsewhere.
Remember, the government just admitted to having CIA\FBI plants in chatrooms dissemenating crap like this.
If I opened it now would you not understand?
I wonder if these cartoonists are interested in doing a new version of the Jetson's. There's a show that could use a technological upgrade.
"The leads are weak? Fuckin' leads are weak? You're Weak! I've Been in this business 15 years"
"What's your name?"
"FUCK YOU! THAT"S MY NAME!"
http://www.wpclipart.com/cartoon/more_cartoons/airplane_cartoon_oops.png
http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
do you have any links for this
where did you see this?
i'd have to agree. sounds a bit out there veen for the conspiracy!!
And let's not forget Van Romero's "relatively small amount of explosives" comment, and all the recognition/awards/grants he got afterwards. Romero made presentations at the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS) before and after 9/11!
And of course, Norman Mineta was VP of Lockheed Martin, a Gold-Level sponsor of DEPS.
And NIST contracted with ARA and SAIC; both are sponsors of DEPS.
One must ask themselves... what are all these DEW-affiliated people doing in and around the truth movement? Why are they here? And why do they speak up against DEW evidence?
Be sure to check out the FULL timeline on checktheevidence.com for all the information:
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=151&Itemid=60
2000, Winter - DEPS’ Newsletter “Wave Front”
The first article in Volume 1, Issue 1 of Wave Front starts with the following quote:
"Lasers in space, lasers in the stratosphere, lasers
on and over the battlefield - we're at the
beginning of an evolutionary new wave of
weaponry."
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/graphics/wavefront2.pdf
hadn't thought about that one.
Yeah no kidding. Reverse spinology.
What remains, is there's a lot of very normal people (billions worldwide) that have a lot of very legitimate questions about this topic. None of which have been answered in the slightest.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")