Thank you, Rosa Brooks.
PJ_Saluki
Posts: 1,006
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-brooks3aug03,0,3406790.column?coll=la-opinion-columnists
(Sound of applause)
It's about time somebody tried to take back those words. She nailed it.
(Sound of applause)
It's about time somebody tried to take back those words. She nailed it.
"Almost all those politicians took money from Enron, and there they are holding hearings. That's like O.J. Simpson getting in the Rae Carruth jury pool." -- Charles Barkley
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
They all heard me for sure...they all gave me sideways looks, but no one said a word.
They did it right while I was ordering from the guy. I was hungry dammit!
Cooking food past 11pm on the street...it's against the law apparently?!
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
The soldier was there fighting in a war while she sits in the comfort of her home and judges his actions as unheroic. That soldier wouldn't say his actions were heroic, she doesn't need to tell him that.
-Enoch Powell
What, exactly, are soldiers supposed to do? They fight wars. It's their jobs. I'm not trying to sound like a callous prick, but when you fight wars professionally, there's always a chance you'll get killed or injured. We do have a volunteer military here in the U.S. They signed on knowing the risks to their lives and health. They weren't conscripted.
Soldiers are definitely not heroes because they sign up to fight. I agree with that. But, it sure as hell takes more balls to be a soldier in Iraq than it does to be a journalist. They may not all be heroes, but they're definitely better than the crummy journalists who gnaw and peck at their heels.
-Enoch Powell
She's criticizing the media, not the soldiers.
I honestly don't see some sort of conspiracy of the negative when it comes to reporters and the war. Oh, and some of those "crummy journalists," they die in war zones, too.
Here's something: http://www.cpj.org/Briefings/2006/killed_05/killed_release_03jan05.html
"New York, January 3, 2006—Kidnappers in Iraq, political assassins in Beirut, and hit men in the Philippines made murder the leading cause of work-related deaths among journalists worldwide in 2005, a new analysis by the Committee to Protect Journalists shows. Forty-seven journalists were killed in 2005, more than three-quarters of whom were murdered to silence their criticism or punish them for their work, CPJ's annual survey found."
And those people signed on for dangerous work, too. Comparing soldiers to journalists, though, is, pardon the cliche, comparing apples to oranges. One group carries guns and tries to kill people; the other group carries note pads and cameras and tries to report on the events, not join in the combat.
Like she said, all of a sudden ALL soldiers, firemen, policemen, etc., are now heroes, and when one actually does go above and beyond and does something heroic, they are lumped in with everyone else (including the handful of unsavory characters in those professions).
I consider them (for the most part) unselfish, and people who are willing to risk their lives at a low paying job to make the world better, but until they do something special, they aren't heroes in my book.
A state cop who rescued hostages or saved someone getting attacked is a hero... the guy who writes speeding tickets all day isn't (unless of course he does something heroic in the course of his daily job).
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln