Home› A Moving Train

What chance for Presidentwould the following have?

steve_inhidingsteve_inhiding Posts: 41
edited April 2008 in A Moving Train
Hi,

I was wondering what you think the chances are of someone being elected President of the USA if they fell into one of the following catagories, assumong they had reasonable policies, of course. Please base this on what you think the country would say, not just yourselves.

A) A women

B) An African-American

C) A Homosexual

D) A Muslim

E) A Jew

F) An Atheist/Agnostic


Cheers
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • brandon10brandon10 Posts: 1,114
    steve_inhiding wrote:
    Hi,

    I was wondering what you think the chances are of someone being elected President of the USA if they fell into one of the following catagories, assumong they had reasonable policies, of course. Please base this on what you think the country would say, not just yourselves.

    A) A women

    B) An African-American

    C) A Homosexual

    D) A Muslim

    E) A Jew

    F) An Atheist/Agnostic


    Cheers

    The retards at Fox news would like to have you believe Obama is B,D, and F.
  • FinsburyParkCarrotsFinsburyParkCarrots Seattle, WA Posts: 12,223
    Hey, I thought Hillary fit all those criteria. :D

    Oh, I forgot G) Not bitter, duck-shooting pisshead.
  • unsungunsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    brandon10 wrote:
    The retards at Fox news would like to have you believe Obama is B,D, and F.


    So he isn't a black man at all?
  • FinsburyParkCarrotsFinsburyParkCarrots Seattle, WA Posts: 12,223
    unsung wrote:
    So he isn't a black man at all?


    Ah, but there's some questioning of the "African-American" terminology, because Obama's not the descendant of imported slaves, right? His dad was Kenyan? I dunno. Something like that. A lot of people get picky about the ideological baggage of the term. You could be of African descent and American, but somehow that would be deemed different if the Middle Passage didn't come into the equation.
  • unsungunsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    steve_inhiding wrote:

    A) A women

    B) An African-American

    C) A Homosexual

    D) A Muslim

    E) A Jew

    F) An Atheist/Agnostic


    Cheers

    A. Hillary has a shot.
    B. Same with Obama
    C. None
    D. None
    E. I see no reason why a good candidate should not be recognized.
    F. Probably not a good chance. Too many Bible thumpers.
  • AbookamongstthemanyAbookamongstthemany Posts: 8,209
    steve_inhiding wrote:
    Hi,

    I was wondering what you think the chances are of someone being elected President of the USA if they fell into one of the following catagories, assumong they had reasonable policies, of course. Please base this on what you think the country would say, not just yourselves.

    A) A women

    B) An African-American

    C) A Homosexual

    D) A Muslim

    E) A Jew

    F) An Atheist/Agnostic


    Cheers

    All of those choices are meaningless if you don't have the millions of dollars it takes to get you smeared all over the tv thus elected. It all comes down to money.
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • TDMize15TDMize15 Posts: 166
    This was actually brought up in my Sociology class about a week ago. Here's what a survey taken on this issue said:

    If the candidate has the following trait:

    -Atheist - 63% are less likely to support
    -Homosexual- 46% are less likely to support
    -Muslim- 46% are less likely to support
    -Woman- 11% are less likely to support
    -Black 4% are less likely to support

    (Can't find a link, it's on my professor's website. He got it from the New York Times 7-22-07)
    All the rusted signs, we ignore throughout our lives, choosing the shiny ones instead...

    And he who forgets, will be destined to remember...
  • steve_inhidingsteve_inhiding Posts: 41
    Don't Know Myself wrote:
    This was actually brought up in my Sociology class about a week ago. Here's what a survey taken on this issue said:

    If the candidate has the following trait:

    -Atheist - 63% are less likely to support
    -Homosexual- 46% are less likely to support
    -Muslim- 46% are less likely to support
    -Woman- 11% are less likely to support
    -Black 4% are less likely to support

    (Can't find a link, it's on my professor's website. He got it from the New York Times 7-22-07)

    Thanks, I think NZ would be roughly the same, except for the atheist, where we generally don't care. Helen Clarke (a woman, believe it or not) is an atheist and no one cares.

    I'm surprised a muslim would receive more support than an atheist, based on just the above criterion.
  • HoonHoon Posts: 175
    steve_inhiding wrote:
    Hi,

    I was wondering what you think the chances are of someone being elected President of the USA if they fell into one of the following catagories, assumong they had reasonable policies, of course. Please base this on what you think the country would say, not just yourselves.

    A) A women

    B) An African-American

    C) A Homosexual

    D) A Muslim

    E) A Jew

    F) An Atheist/Agnostic


    Cheers


    please ignore me when I don't play by the rules

    G) A Croatian American

    H) Someone who grew up in Poverty and Homeless

    J) Crohn's disease, surgery at 21. Lost 5.5ft of small bowel + 2.5ft of colon

    K) ucinich Never sold out
    If you keep yourself as the final arbiter you will be less susceptible to infection from cultural illusion.
  • tybirdtybird Posts: 17,388
    unsung wrote:
    A. Hillary has a shot.
    B. Same with Obama
    C. None
    D. None
    E. I see no reason why a good candidate should not be recognized.
    F. Probably not a good chance. Too many Bible thumpers.
    Looks about right to me.
    All the world will be your enemy, Prince with a thousand enemies, and whenever they catch you, they will kill you. But first they must catch you, digger, listener, runner, prince with the swift warning. Be cunning and full of tricks and your people shall never be destroyed.
  • tybirdtybird Posts: 17,388
    FinsburyParkCarrots wrote:
    Ah, but there's some questioning of the "African-American" terminology, because Obama's not the descendant of imported slaves, right? His dad was Kenyan? I dunno. Something like that. A lot of people get picky about the ideological baggage of the term. You could be of African descent and American, but somehow that would be deemed different if the Middle Passage didn't come into the equation.
    Yes sir, that's some crazy shit....about like the argument of how black one is based on the particular shade of one's skin. :rolleyes:
    All the world will be your enemy, Prince with a thousand enemies, and whenever they catch you, they will kill you. But first they must catch you, digger, listener, runner, prince with the swift warning. Be cunning and full of tricks and your people shall never be destroyed.
Sign In or Register to comment.