David Duke on Barack Obama

CorporateWhoreCorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
edited August 2008 in A Moving Train
http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/06/11/president-obama-many-white-supremacists-are-celebrating/

"With the nomination of Barack Obama as the Democratic presidential candidate clinched, large sections of the white supremacist movement are adopting a surprising attitude: Electing America’s first black president would be a very good thing.

It’s not that the assortment of neo-Nazis, Klansmen, anti-Semites and others who make up this country’s radical right have suddenly discovered that a man should be judged based on the content of his character, not his skin. On the contrary. A growing number of white supremacists, and even some of those who pass for intellectual leaders of their movement, think that a black man in the Oval Office would shock white America, possibly drive millions to their cause, and perhaps even set off a race war that, they hope, would ultimately end in Aryan victory..."

LOL

I've been away for some time, but I thought I'd touch on an issue that has probably been missed in my absence. And that would be the impact an Obama presidency would have on the racial consciousness of this country.

We all know folks who've claimed "I would vote for a black president!" Well, now they've got their opportunity.

David Duke has claimed that a McCain presidency would fool white america, while an Obama presidency would associate the problems of socialism with the black man. In turn, this would cause white folks to drift toward Duke's views.

Already, a bunch of racial issues have arisen in Obama's campaign. From his description of his grandmother, who raised him, as a "typical white person" to his complaining about "not being one of the faces on a dollar bill."

He seems testy. Like a complainer. Like he knows that McCain just wants to say the N word and put an arm around David Duke.

Heh, I'm interested in our PJ thoughts about Obama's impact on racial consciousness in america.
All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
-Enoch Powell
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • David sounds more desperate than Barak in gaining public approval...
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • David sounds more desperate than Barak in gaining public approval...

    Hah, comparing Obama and Duke's attempts at gaining public approval is quite enjoyable. Methinks they are both a couple of rapskallions.
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • Hah, comparing Obama and Duke's attempts at gaining public approval is quite enjoyable. Methinks they are both a couple of rapskallions.


    I don't think he's the "anti-christ" per se....but I'm highly skeptical in light of all current (and past) circumstances. I think everyone else should be skeptical as well...considering.

    More pressure to perform and meet public expectation so to speak...and that's a very good thing as far as democracy is concerned.

    now....Barak on the other hand...haha j/k


    Barak needs a small glowing public fire under his ass instead of his fanbase's lips in my opinion. Perhaps I'm premature in my thinking, I think the public should be far more critical and tighten the screws on this shit....but I digress.... Let's just say I hope the star dazzled experience is not a prolonged one after election.

    Anyhow voting McCain is like saying "pass the gun and fire up the draft...It's on!"

    that seems a bit severe to me.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • I don't think he's the "anti-christ" per se....but I'm highly skeptical in light of all current (and past) circumstances. I think everyone else should be skeptical as well...considering.

    More pressure to perform and meet public expectation so to speak...and that's a very good thing as far as democracy is concerned.

    now....Barak on the other hand...haha j/k


    Barak needs a small glowing public fire under his ass instead of his fanbase's lips in my opinion. Perhaps I'm premature in my thinking, I think the public should be far more critical and tighten the screws on this shit....but I digress.... Let's just say I hope the star dazzled experience is not a prolonged one after election.

    Anyhow voting McCain is like saying "pass the gun and fire up the draft...It's on!"

    that seems a bit severe to me.

    True, McCain is terrible no question.

    The problem with Obama is that he's a demagogue, much like Rev. Wright. In his Europe speech, he expounded about how "this is our time" blah blah blah. Empty rhetoric like that points to his lack of substance. He's a figurehead. There's no reliable way to predict what exactly he will do.

    "Change"? What change? $0.53?

    The problem with a demagogue is that he cannot get out of the spotlight. And so Obama will do things that keep him in the spotlight. He will not fade away during his presidency. He'll do things to get attention because he craves it.

    Just like "invading Pakistan." That was an attention seeking comment.
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • True, McCain is terrible no question.

    The problem with Obama is that he's a demagogue, much like Rev. Wright. In his Europe speech, he expounded about how "this is our time" blah blah blah. Empty rhetoric like that points to his lack of substance. He's a figurehead. There's no reliable way to predict what exactly he will do.

    "Change"? What change? $0.53?

    The problem with a demagogue is that he cannot get out of the spotlight. And so Obama will do things that keep him in the spotlight. He will not fade away during his presidency. He'll do things to get attention because he craves it.

    Just like "invading Pakistan." That was an attention seeking comment.

    Interesting perspective, and pretty much my exact sentiments. The predictability factor is sketchy at best, and that's being polite.

    What really drives Barak Obama is the question?

    world peace?....personal ego and notoriety?(but how much really?)? world hunger? Corporatocracy (might have just invented a word), Big oil? Cash?

    Who knows? I don't .... I can't tell from the pandering.

    bho-bho is somewhat of a question mark to me.

    then I see stuff like this...(regardless of the source)
    http://massdiscussion.blogspot.com/2008/06/collection-of-obama-flip-flops.html

    and it's like..."oh boy.....now I feel MUCH (much) better..."

    aye-carumba...
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
Sign In or Register to comment.