Global warming and cattle, oh my!

CorporateWhoreCorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
edited December 2006 in A Moving Train
http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/article2062484.ece

"Livestock are responsible for 18 per cent of the greenhouse gases that cause global warming, more than cars, planes and all other forms of transport put together."

Oh my.

Which makes me think that, instead of eating less beef (as PETA would have me believe), we should be eating more!!

Haha.
All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
-Enoch Powell
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/article2062484.ece

    "Livestock are responsible for 18 per cent of the greenhouse gases that cause global warming, more than cars, planes and all other forms of transport put together."

    Oh my.

    Which makes me think that, instead of eating less beef (as PETA would have me believe), we should be eating more!!

    Haha.


    Good call. As a concerned citizen I'm going to up my beef intake.
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    Yea, biological waste.

    Volcanic activity releases greenhouse gases as well.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • Ahnimus wrote:
    Yea, biological waste.

    Volcanic activity releases greenhouse gases as well.


    I prefer not to eat lava, so I will do my part by killing those nasty hefers.
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    I prefer not to eat lava, so I will do my part by killing those nasty hefers.

    Actually in that regard, if you didn't eat cattle, they wouldn't farm as much of it and there would be less cows.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    You can also blame human flatulence.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • Ahnimus wrote:
    You can also blame human flatulence.

    You can also blame the shit I just took.
  • Ahnimus wrote:
    Actually in that regard, if you didn't eat cattle, they wouldn't farm as much of it and there would be less cows.

    That is a true statement.

    By my joke, I was just saying that if they stopped farming cattle then we could just eat all of the leftover cattle really quickly.

    I feel as though transportation systems get a lot of shit for producing so much CO2, but when you put it in perspective, it's really not so bad. There are probably more cattle on earth today than there have ever been in the history of man. Right? This is a direct result of mankind's needs. Therefore, it seems like mankind needs to stop being so darn needy! Hah.
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    That is a true statement.

    By my joke, I was just saying that if they stopped farming cattle then we could just eat all of the leftover cattle really quickly.

    I feel as though transportation systems get a lot of shit for producing so much CO2, but when you put it in perspective, it's really not so bad. There are probably more cattle on earth today than there have ever been in the history of man. Right? This is a direct result of mankind's needs. Therefore, it seems like mankind needs to stop being so darn needy! Hah.

    True enough, but if you look the history of CO2 and global warming over the last few billions years. It doesn't seem to be something we can stop. Even plants become biological waste eventually. Though it would be a lot better if we didn't have cows dropping big pies all the time.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • El_KabongEl_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    I prefer not to eat lava, so I will do my part by killing those nasty hefers.


    you prefer gorwth hormones and antibiotics you don't need?
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • godpt3godpt3 Posts: 1,020
    99.9% of the people who believe this are complete idiots. This isn't exactly a new idea. Jeremy Rifkin was shouting the same BS from the rooftops way back in the early '90s.

    Humans exhale carbon dioxide. If we really want to stop global warming, I'd suggest everyone STOP BREATHING.

    Cow farts cause greenhouse gasses.
    Sun spots cause global warming.
    The space shuttle causes global warming.



    And if you dig deep enough, EVERY single "expert" who spews this nonsense out is linked in one way or another to the oil industry. Just as long as they're able to lay the blame on anybody else's doorstep.
    "If all those sweet, young things were laid end to end, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised."
    —Dorothy Parker

    http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
  • NMyTreeNMyTree Posts: 2,374
    There are more humans on this planet than any other animal. Our farts and gases have to contribute much more than the cows. Maybe we should fart into self-sealing containers, than submit them for use as an energy source, no?
  • godpt3godpt3 Posts: 1,020
    NMyTree wrote:
    There are more humans on this planet than any other animal. Our farts and gases have to contribute much more than the cows. Maybe we should fart into self-sealing containers, than submit them for use as an energy source, no?

    The concentration of methane isn't high enough to support combustion. Geez, don't you people watch Mythbusters.
    "If all those sweet, young things were laid end to end, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised."
    —Dorothy Parker

    http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
  • NMyTreeNMyTree Posts: 2,374
    godpt3 wrote:
    The concentration of methane isn't high enough to support combustion. Geez, don't you people watch Mythbusters.

    :D:D
  • El_Kabong wrote:
    you prefer gorwth hormones and antibiotics you don't need?

    They keep me strong like bull
  • rebornFixerrebornFixer Posts: 4,901
    El_Kabong wrote:
    you prefer gorwth hormones and antibiotics you don't need?

    Its actually possible to eat beef that does not contain this shit. I've switched to organic, naturally-raised meat.

    Of course, you know that (about the organic meat). Just responding to your rhetoric in kind. ;)
  • onelongsongonelongsong Posts: 3,517
    http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/article2062484.ece

    "Livestock are responsible for 18 per cent of the greenhouse gases that cause global warming, more than cars, planes and all other forms of transport put together."

    Oh my.

    Which makes me think that, instead of eating less beef (as PETA would have me believe), we should be eating more!!

    Haha.

    as i always say; an article is only as valid as the author. one writes with their opinion in mind. the cause is not cattle; but methane which is a byproduct of decomposition.
Sign In or Register to comment.