Home› A Moving Train

If the Libs want to impeach Bush, let them

CorporateWhoreCorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
edited July 2007 in A Moving Train
Though I probably wouldn't agree with their reasons for doing it, I would support the impeachment of the president because he has failed to enforce the law on the border. He's failed to protect our sovereignty.

If the libs want to impeach him for his conduct during the war, I'd support it. The ends justify the means in this case.
All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
-Enoch Powell
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • pjalive21pjalive21 St. Louis, MO Posts: 2,818
    CorporateWhore wrote:
    Though I probably wouldn't agree with their reasons for doing it, I would support the impeachment of the president because he has failed to enforce the law on the border. He's failed to protect our sovereignty.

    If the libs want to impeach him for his conduct during the war, I'd support it. The ends justify the means in this case.


    they can do it but wont....

    i would agree with YOUR reason for impeaching him because of not protecting our borders, more than the Iraq debacle, i dont know what that man is thinking anymore
  • AbookamongstthemanyAbookamongstthemany Posts: 8,209
    pjalive21 wrote:
    they can do it but wont....

    i would agree with YOUR reason for impeaching him because of not protecting our borders, more than the Iraq debacle, i dont know what that man is thinking anymore


    http://kucinich.house.gov/SpotlightIssues/documents.htm
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • CorporateWhoreCorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    Abookamongstthemany wrote:
    http://kucinich.house.gov/SpotlightIssues/documents.htm
    Well let's not go crazy.

    Obama has stated that he would be opposed to impeaching Bush, though.
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • AbookamongstthemanyAbookamongstthemany Posts: 8,209
    CorporateWhore wrote:
    Well let's not go crazy.

    Obama has stated that he would be opposed to impeaching Bush, though.

    Go crazy?

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=CbvEAkHh1uA
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • CorporateWhoreCorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    Abookamongstthemany wrote:
    Go crazy?

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=CbvEAkHh1uA

    Well he's right but he probably supports a subjective view of the constitution that he holds in his pocket.
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • CorporateWhoreCorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    This government needs a top to bottom change. Complete and utter elimination of those who have corrupted it.
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • AbookamongstthemanyAbookamongstthemany Posts: 8,209
    CorporateWhore wrote:
    Well he's right but he probably supports a subjective view of the constitution that he holds in his pocket.

    We all kinda do...it seems.
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    CorporateWhore wrote:
    This government needs a top to bottom change. Complete and utter elimination of those who have corrupted it.

    Now there is something I can agree with you 100%. I would go even further and say not only do we have to eliminate those that have corrupted it, we have to undertake a massive scaling back of the size and scope of the federal government.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • RolandTD20KdrummerRolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    If Botch and Chubby get punted and Pelosi goes in...what do we do with prime directive cluster fuck #1?

    Mess...huge mess...but not impossible. What is impossible?

    I say give it a try (obviously) but be ready to fire up the guns again...as the Neo-cons have fucked us silly and sideways in a hand basket.

    Honestly, right now The US govt is out of control... it's a disaster.

    We need alternatives.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • CorporateWhoreCorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    mammasan wrote:
    Now there is something I can agree with you 100%. I would go even further and say not only do we have to eliminate those that have corrupted it, we have to undertake a massive scaling back of the size and scope of the federal government.

    DONE AND DONE. Make the federal govt so small that you could drown it in a bath tub.
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • CorporateWhoreCorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    Count me in as one of the Repubs who won't vote for any of the libs that are currently the front-running nominees. I'd rather let Hillary win than let Rudy or McCain in.
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • Bu2Bu2 Posts: 1,693
    *rubs finger against nose*
    We all know the players involved here. We all know the power they have.

    *nods head*

    Covert operations are usually handled covertly.

    Make sure you have your slip on, and that you can see when it's snowing.
    Feels Good Inc.
  • Bu2Bu2 Posts: 1,693
    CorporateWhore wrote:
    Count me in as one of the Repubs who won't vote for any of the libs that are currently the front-running nominees. I'd rather let Hillary win than let Rudy or McCain in.

    Who exactly are you for, ho?
    Feels Good Inc.
  • Bu2Bu2 Posts: 1,693
    happy 4th, by the way.
    Feels Good Inc.
  • CorporateWhoreCorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    Bu2 wrote:
    Who exactly are you for, ho?

    Ron Paul
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • Bu2Bu2 Posts: 1,693
    I have to admit, he makes watching the debates very interesting.
    Feels Good Inc.
  • CorporateWhoreCorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    Bu2 wrote:
    I have to admit, he makes watching the debates very interesting.

    He wants to kill the IRS. He wants to end the war. Ron Paul knows what the fuck he is talking about and the other Republicans don't have a fucking clue.

    Abolish the IRS? That's fucking awesome.
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    CorporateWhore wrote:
    Ron Paul

    Now I know the apocolypse is near when CorporateWhore and I are supporting the same candidate.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • CorporateWhoreCorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    mammasan wrote:
    Now I know the apocolypse is near when CorporateWhore and I are supporting the same candidate.

    Well, he IS pro-life, pro-gun rights, and supports border enforcement. I bet he's closer to me than to you.

    Nonetheless, Paul is a uniting figure because he's intelligent and principled. You know what he believes. That's something we should be EXPECTING from each and every candidate.
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    CorporateWhore wrote:
    Well, he IS pro-life, pro-gun rights, and supports border enforcement. I bet he's closer to me than to you.

    Nonetheless, Paul is a uniting figure because he's intelligent and principled. You know what he believes. That's something we should be EXPECTING from each and every candidate.

    We as far as his pro-life pro-gun rights I support him because he believes it should be left up to each individual state, which is the way it should be. I also support his belief that we should do away with the IRS and his stance on minimal federal government.

    But you are correct that even if you don't agree with his policies you can't help but admire the man because you know where he stands and he is a man of principle and honesty.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • Bu2Bu2 Posts: 1,693
    Does that make me so different from you?

    Even though I'm pro-choice, not like you?

    I like them intelligent and well-spoken too.




    Obama '08
    Feels Good Inc.
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    Wouldn't an Impeached President Bush result in a President Cheney?
    ...
    I thought Bush(41) had a bulletproof vest with Vice President Quayle... Cheney give Bush(43) an Atom Bombproof vest.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • hippiemomhippiemom Posts: 3,326
    CorporateWhore wrote:
    Obama has stated that he would be opposed to impeaching Bush, though.
    I haven't decided who to support, but I hadn't ruled out Obama until he said that. I'm through with him now. I can't understand anyone who doesn't want to see these criminals impeached.
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
  • RainDogRainDog Posts: 1,824
    Cosmo wrote:
    Wouldn't an Impeached President Bush result in a President Cheney?
    ...
    I thought Bush(41) had a bulletproof vest with Vice President Quayle... Cheney give Bush(43) an Atom Bombproof vest.
    We already have President Cheney. The impeachment of President Bush would result in Congress spending the remainder of this term focusing solely on impeachment. Then, in a year in a half, Bush leaves office. Just like he's going to anyway.

    Personally, I'm not opposed to impeachment; it'd certainly be fun to watch. But it wouldn't do anything to end Bush's term any sooner. In my opinion, the window on impeachment closed a year, year and a half ago.
  • Pacomc79Pacomc79 Posts: 9,404
    it's a waste of time and effort. Better to focus on the future
    My Girlfriend said to me..."How many guitars do you need?" and I replied...."How many pairs of shoes do you need?" She got really quiet.
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    I have to agree with RainDog and Pacomc79. As much as I believe that the leaders of this administration should face the consiquences of their actions an effort to impeach them would be a major waste of time. Congress cam barely get anything done as it is never mind if they are all wrapped up in the impeachment process.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    Can't we just impeach Cheney?

    http://impeachcheney.org/?utm_source=rgemail

    But in all seriousness, I agree that impeaching at this point is rather redundant. We need to overthrow the entire administraion and throw them in jail. Bush deserves a fair trial.
Sign In or Register to comment.