Tillman's family calls Bullshit
gue_barium
Posts: 5,515
Statement from the Tillman family after the Army found no criminal wrongdoing in Pat Tillman's death and subsequent cover-up:
Our family will continue to pursue the full truth about the circumstances of Pat Tillman's death and the so-called “missteps” of the Army, the Department of Defense, and this administration.
The briefing we just received was unsatisfactory.
The characterization of criminal negligence, professional misconduct, battlefield incompetence, concealment and destruction of evidence, deliberate deception, and conspiracy to deceive are not “missteps.”
These actions are malfeasance.
In our opinion, this attempt to impose closure by slapping the wrists of a few officers and enlisted men is yet another bureaucratic entrenchment.
The Army continues to deny the family, and the public that pays for the Army with its taxes, access to the original investigation and the sworn statements from that investigation, conducted by Capt. Richard Scott, former commander of Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 2nd Ranger Battalion.
His investigation contained the unaltered statements, taken when memories were still fresh, by witnesses to the events surrounding Pat's death.
We know from subsequent sworn statements that more than one of the original statements was altered, after Captain Scott's investigation “disappeared.”
This is not a misstep.
It is evidence-tampering.
The Army has yet to provide the family with a copy of the original narrative required by Army Regulation to support the award of the Silver Star.
While they admitted today that there were improprieties in the submission of the award, they appear to have intentionally stopped short in every single “misstep” of actual criminal actions.
Submitting fraudulent awards is a crime.
More than one person participating in the construction of a fraudulent award is conspiracy.
The general officer who appears to bear the brunt of this so-called investigation is Lt. Gen. Kensinger.
While he is not blameless, we believe he is the pawn being sacrificed to protect the king, that king being secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.
Investigators from the Army ... tell us that Secretary Rumsfeld was not even aware that Pat's death was friendly fire for almost a month.
Anyone familiar with former Secretary Rumsfeld's reputation as an unforgiving micromanager must find this claim to be extremely disingenuous.
The Army regulation on the award of the Silver Star requires a detailed summary, elicited from witness statements, of the exact circumstances of the event which precipitates the award.
We know, from sworn statements, that the award was directed by then-Regimental Commander Col. James Nixon on April 23rd, before the unit with the witnesses had even returned from the field for debriefing.
We know, from sworn statements, that the original draft of the award falsely claimed that Pat was killed by enemy fire, when Pat was not subjected to enemy fire throughout the entire incident.
We know, from sworn statements, that the draft was changed to exclude explicit reference to enemy fire – probably as a precautionary legal measure – while maintaining the impression that Pat was killed in an intense firefight with the enemy ... which he was not.
The Army can still not cite a single instance of any Silver Star, before Pat, that was awarded in the case of fratricide, when the subject of the award was never fired upon by the enemy.
No one who knew Pat ever doubted his physical or moral courage.
But the award of the Silver Star appears more than anything to be part of a cynical design to conceal the real events from the family and the public, while exploiting the death of our beloved Pat as a recruitment poster.
The characterization of this fraudulent award as a list of “deficiencies” has the powerful odor of intentional minimization to a level just below criminal, in a case for which the accumulation of errors and missteps has long past the laws of probability for coincidence.
E-mails discovered in the conduct of investigations refer to a “Silver Star Game Plan.” This certainly at least suggests conspiracy.
The entire military, we believe, compelled by the Secretary of Defense's office, was seeking to accentuate the positive and eliminate the negative, as it was embroiled in a huge tactical setback in Iraq in April 2004, and as the Pentagon was preparing to deal with the public affairs crisis engendered by the about-to-be-revealed horror stories from Abu Ghraib.
This investigation draws conclusions, conclusions that are meant to be implanted in the minds of the American public, that say the wrongdoing flowed from bottom to top.
We base our beliefs on the relentless pattern of the Bush administration of deception, evasion, and spin in the conduct of the entire dual-occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan.
We remain convinced that the priority of the Pentagon was to prevent the public knowing that Pat was killed by the military's highest priority shock infantry unit; and that he was killed by a combination of shoddy leadership and clear violations of the Rules of Engagement, as well as violations of the Law of Land Warfare.
We detail only two major themes in a much larger story.
These themes exemplify the way this case has been handled, and the way it continues to be handled.
These examples show that we are not dealing with “missteps.”
There is an overpowering suggestion of violations of law, regulation, and policy that reaches from the vehicle that fired on Pat and took his life to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, who – with his reputation as a world-class micromanager – was certainly aware of every move made in this case.
In three years of struggling with the Pentagon's public affairs apparatus, we have never been dealt with honestly.
We will now shift out efforts into Congress, to which we appeal for investigation.
Perhaps subpoenas are necessary to elicit candor and accuracy from the military.
We do not think that Pat's notoriety – about which Pat himself was self-effacing – gives him a special qualification for Congressional attention.
But if that notoriety can serve as a catalyst to open dozens of cases – many of the families known to us – of troops who were killed in Iraq and Afghanistan by fratricide, and whose families, like us, were deceived about the circumstances of these deaths.
We believe Pat would approve of this.
These cases will further establish a pattern – now well-known by the American public – of spin and deception by the Pentagon and the administration it serves.
Our family has worked hard to stay out of the spotlight.
We have continued to hope that we might receive satisfactory answers from the Pentagon and the executive branch.
Now we ask the assistance of Congress and the press.
Human beings continue to be sacrificed on the altar of a dual foreign military occupation.
Thousands of Americans and Afghans, hundreds of U.S. allies, and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis' lives have been lost and shattered.
We say these things with disappointment and sadness for our country.
Nonetheless, we will persevere in our search for the truth.
The truth is not what we received today.
Once again, we are being used as props in a Pentagon public relations exercise.
Our family will continue to pursue the full truth about the circumstances of Pat Tillman's death and the so-called “missteps” of the Army, the Department of Defense, and this administration.
The briefing we just received was unsatisfactory.
The characterization of criminal negligence, professional misconduct, battlefield incompetence, concealment and destruction of evidence, deliberate deception, and conspiracy to deceive are not “missteps.”
These actions are malfeasance.
In our opinion, this attempt to impose closure by slapping the wrists of a few officers and enlisted men is yet another bureaucratic entrenchment.
The Army continues to deny the family, and the public that pays for the Army with its taxes, access to the original investigation and the sworn statements from that investigation, conducted by Capt. Richard Scott, former commander of Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 2nd Ranger Battalion.
His investigation contained the unaltered statements, taken when memories were still fresh, by witnesses to the events surrounding Pat's death.
We know from subsequent sworn statements that more than one of the original statements was altered, after Captain Scott's investigation “disappeared.”
This is not a misstep.
It is evidence-tampering.
The Army has yet to provide the family with a copy of the original narrative required by Army Regulation to support the award of the Silver Star.
While they admitted today that there were improprieties in the submission of the award, they appear to have intentionally stopped short in every single “misstep” of actual criminal actions.
Submitting fraudulent awards is a crime.
More than one person participating in the construction of a fraudulent award is conspiracy.
The general officer who appears to bear the brunt of this so-called investigation is Lt. Gen. Kensinger.
While he is not blameless, we believe he is the pawn being sacrificed to protect the king, that king being secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.
Investigators from the Army ... tell us that Secretary Rumsfeld was not even aware that Pat's death was friendly fire for almost a month.
Anyone familiar with former Secretary Rumsfeld's reputation as an unforgiving micromanager must find this claim to be extremely disingenuous.
The Army regulation on the award of the Silver Star requires a detailed summary, elicited from witness statements, of the exact circumstances of the event which precipitates the award.
We know, from sworn statements, that the award was directed by then-Regimental Commander Col. James Nixon on April 23rd, before the unit with the witnesses had even returned from the field for debriefing.
We know, from sworn statements, that the original draft of the award falsely claimed that Pat was killed by enemy fire, when Pat was not subjected to enemy fire throughout the entire incident.
We know, from sworn statements, that the draft was changed to exclude explicit reference to enemy fire – probably as a precautionary legal measure – while maintaining the impression that Pat was killed in an intense firefight with the enemy ... which he was not.
The Army can still not cite a single instance of any Silver Star, before Pat, that was awarded in the case of fratricide, when the subject of the award was never fired upon by the enemy.
No one who knew Pat ever doubted his physical or moral courage.
But the award of the Silver Star appears more than anything to be part of a cynical design to conceal the real events from the family and the public, while exploiting the death of our beloved Pat as a recruitment poster.
The characterization of this fraudulent award as a list of “deficiencies” has the powerful odor of intentional minimization to a level just below criminal, in a case for which the accumulation of errors and missteps has long past the laws of probability for coincidence.
E-mails discovered in the conduct of investigations refer to a “Silver Star Game Plan.” This certainly at least suggests conspiracy.
The entire military, we believe, compelled by the Secretary of Defense's office, was seeking to accentuate the positive and eliminate the negative, as it was embroiled in a huge tactical setback in Iraq in April 2004, and as the Pentagon was preparing to deal with the public affairs crisis engendered by the about-to-be-revealed horror stories from Abu Ghraib.
This investigation draws conclusions, conclusions that are meant to be implanted in the minds of the American public, that say the wrongdoing flowed from bottom to top.
We base our beliefs on the relentless pattern of the Bush administration of deception, evasion, and spin in the conduct of the entire dual-occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan.
We remain convinced that the priority of the Pentagon was to prevent the public knowing that Pat was killed by the military's highest priority shock infantry unit; and that he was killed by a combination of shoddy leadership and clear violations of the Rules of Engagement, as well as violations of the Law of Land Warfare.
We detail only two major themes in a much larger story.
These themes exemplify the way this case has been handled, and the way it continues to be handled.
These examples show that we are not dealing with “missteps.”
There is an overpowering suggestion of violations of law, regulation, and policy that reaches from the vehicle that fired on Pat and took his life to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, who – with his reputation as a world-class micromanager – was certainly aware of every move made in this case.
In three years of struggling with the Pentagon's public affairs apparatus, we have never been dealt with honestly.
We will now shift out efforts into Congress, to which we appeal for investigation.
Perhaps subpoenas are necessary to elicit candor and accuracy from the military.
We do not think that Pat's notoriety – about which Pat himself was self-effacing – gives him a special qualification for Congressional attention.
But if that notoriety can serve as a catalyst to open dozens of cases – many of the families known to us – of troops who were killed in Iraq and Afghanistan by fratricide, and whose families, like us, were deceived about the circumstances of these deaths.
We believe Pat would approve of this.
These cases will further establish a pattern – now well-known by the American public – of spin and deception by the Pentagon and the administration it serves.
Our family has worked hard to stay out of the spotlight.
We have continued to hope that we might receive satisfactory answers from the Pentagon and the executive branch.
Now we ask the assistance of Congress and the press.
Human beings continue to be sacrificed on the altar of a dual foreign military occupation.
Thousands of Americans and Afghans, hundreds of U.S. allies, and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis' lives have been lost and shattered.
We say these things with disappointment and sadness for our country.
Nonetheless, we will persevere in our search for the truth.
The truth is not what we received today.
Once again, we are being used as props in a Pentagon public relations exercise.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
"Once again, we are being used as props in a Pentagon public relations exercise."
This administration really is evil. They kill their own citizens and use them as propaganda. :mad:
http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
...
We do a great dishonor in everything he was supposed to stand for... about what is right with America... with the conduct of our government and our military surrounding the facts of his death. Pat Tillman is a symbol for Truth, not excuses, deception and out and out lies. He has become more of a symbol of what this Bush Administration is doing TO America... under the guise of what they are doing FOR America.
Honor Pat Tillman by just telling the goddamn truth... you filthy little weasles.
Hail, Hail!!!
PBM
Wishlist Foundation: http://wishlistfoundation.org
I found this:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/03/27/tillman.mother/
""It became very obvious early on that they were lying to us," Mary Tillman said on ESPN Radio's "Dan Patrick Show." "They were only telling one side of the story. They weren't telling the other side."
"Everyone involved in the shooting knew almost immediately that her son had been shot three times in the head by his own troops, she said.
Yet, at the memorial service for her son in May 2004, the military said Pat Tillman had been killed by enemy fire, she said.
"That was not a misstep, that was not an error," she said. "This was an attempt to dupe the public and to promote this war and to get recruitments up, and that is immoral."
Mary Tillman called for a congressional hearing "to have it all aired out."
She added, "I really don't know what happened. We've been told so many different things."'
Mary Tillman said she was not excluding the possibility that her son was shot intentionally.
"The first investigative officer, in his statement to the third investigative officer, said in his opinion, there was evidence of criminal intent, and he also used the term 'criminal negligence,' " Tillman said.
"Yet his report has been devalued because it doesn't go along with what they want out in the public eye."
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.