Campbell Brown should not be viewed as someone reporting news.
macgyver06
Posts: 2,500
Thoughts on CNN star Campbell Brown
I would like to start off first by saying her articles in print are hard to read considering the picture of her own image is abnormally large. The great thing about writers is that the words they print are their image and their own brand. Brown seems to be using her sex appeal as a way to become a star. This is the first reason she should not be considered as a credible source. Those who have seen the articles know what I am talking about. Unfortunately for my opening piece I can't provide a link because she is now doing strictly video commentary as she is reading what she has written in front of the camera.
Her slogan ''No Bias, No Bull'' is simply an absurd lie. In the civilized society anyone who claims to be unbiased is simply biased. It is impossible to write an article formulated from thought and have it called ''No Bias''. The only way it could be achieved is if you reported just dialogue completely unedited.
I will provide a link of her video that includes text at the bottom. Not only is her entire commentary an opinion(bias), she misses the point of the entire conversation and portrays Barack Obama as someone who is ducking media questions when he is not. The Tribune is a media outlet and no one of any power can answer a question when the initial question is set up based on information that hasn't been released yet. Here is the link:
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/12/17/ ... index.html
My intention with this post is to inform the potential unsuspecting citizen that stumbles across her readings that they are not only biased and littered with her personal opinions, they come from a media outlet similar in structure to MSNBC, which has been accused by former reporters of slanting stories to meet their agenda. Here is a link to that:
this is former employee of MSNBC Jessica Yellin telling you that they edited her writings to their agenda. While unfortunately she seems to be telling the truth now, she can no longer be trusted either as she was silent of this until after leaving the company.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULw0tfYvxhU
I would like to start off first by saying her articles in print are hard to read considering the picture of her own image is abnormally large. The great thing about writers is that the words they print are their image and their own brand. Brown seems to be using her sex appeal as a way to become a star. This is the first reason she should not be considered as a credible source. Those who have seen the articles know what I am talking about. Unfortunately for my opening piece I can't provide a link because she is now doing strictly video commentary as she is reading what she has written in front of the camera.
Her slogan ''No Bias, No Bull'' is simply an absurd lie. In the civilized society anyone who claims to be unbiased is simply biased. It is impossible to write an article formulated from thought and have it called ''No Bias''. The only way it could be achieved is if you reported just dialogue completely unedited.
I will provide a link of her video that includes text at the bottom. Not only is her entire commentary an opinion(bias), she misses the point of the entire conversation and portrays Barack Obama as someone who is ducking media questions when he is not. The Tribune is a media outlet and no one of any power can answer a question when the initial question is set up based on information that hasn't been released yet. Here is the link:
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/12/17/ ... index.html
My intention with this post is to inform the potential unsuspecting citizen that stumbles across her readings that they are not only biased and littered with her personal opinions, they come from a media outlet similar in structure to MSNBC, which has been accused by former reporters of slanting stories to meet their agenda. Here is a link to that:
this is former employee of MSNBC Jessica Yellin telling you that they edited her writings to their agenda. While unfortunately she seems to be telling the truth now, she can no longer be trusted either as she was silent of this until after leaving the company.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULw0tfYvxhU
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
She is flanked by Bill O'Reilly on the right and Keith Olbermann on the left. I don't see the show succeeding in any way unless she becomes as outspoken (at certain times on her show) as her competition is. Keep in mind that this is a business and about ratings. CNN could do a true "no bias, no bull" hour but they would never be compeditive at that hour.
Her lisp is excruciating also. Oh, and her husband is a right-wing nut job.
O'reilly's show is based on facts backed up by his own opinion,He does however lean to the right but he is not a republican he's a registered independent.