Restore the Rule of Law
macgyver06
Posts: 2,500
Restore the Rule of Law
Prominent Constitutional law experts believe President Bush has engaged in at least, five categories of repeated, defiant “high crimes and misdemeanors”, which separately or together would allow Congress to subject the President to impeachment under Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution. The sworn oath of members of Congress is to uphold the Constitution. Failure of the members of Congress to pursue impeachment of President Bush is an affront to the founding fathers, the Constitution, and the people of the United States.
In addition to a criminal war of aggression in Iraq, in violation of our constitution, statutes and treaties, there are the arrests of thousands of Americans and their imprisonment without charges, the spying on Americans without juridical warrant, systematic torture, and the unprecedented wholesale, defiant signing statements declaring that the President, in his unbridled discretion, is the law.
In 2005, a plurality of the American people polled declared that they would favor impeachment of President Bush if it was shown that he did not tell the truth about the reasons for going to War in Iraq. Congress should use its authority under Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution to officially determine what President Bush knew before going to war in Iraq.
For more information on how you can help build a national, grassroots initiative to investigate and disclose any crimes by the Bush Administration go to http://www.restoreruleoflaw.com. This website contains valuable information and allows for you to send a letter to your members of Congress, asking them to pursue the Rule of Law.
(Ralph Nader)
Prominent Constitutional law experts believe President Bush has engaged in at least, five categories of repeated, defiant “high crimes and misdemeanors”, which separately or together would allow Congress to subject the President to impeachment under Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution. The sworn oath of members of Congress is to uphold the Constitution. Failure of the members of Congress to pursue impeachment of President Bush is an affront to the founding fathers, the Constitution, and the people of the United States.
In addition to a criminal war of aggression in Iraq, in violation of our constitution, statutes and treaties, there are the arrests of thousands of Americans and their imprisonment without charges, the spying on Americans without juridical warrant, systematic torture, and the unprecedented wholesale, defiant signing statements declaring that the President, in his unbridled discretion, is the law.
In 2005, a plurality of the American people polled declared that they would favor impeachment of President Bush if it was shown that he did not tell the truth about the reasons for going to War in Iraq. Congress should use its authority under Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution to officially determine what President Bush knew before going to war in Iraq.
For more information on how you can help build a national, grassroots initiative to investigate and disclose any crimes by the Bush Administration go to http://www.restoreruleoflaw.com. This website contains valuable information and allows for you to send a letter to your members of Congress, asking them to pursue the Rule of Law.
(Ralph Nader)
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
-
such a sheep following those .COM sites. enjoy being spoon fed?0
-
lazymoon13 wrote:such a sheep following those .COM sites. enjoy being spoon fed?
ive figured out what that 13 means in your name0 -
lazymoon13 wrote:such a sheep following those .COM sites. enjoy being spoon fed?
he he he...:D0 -
macgyver06 wrote:ive figured out what that 13 means in your name
I figured out your a fraud.0 -
lazymoon13 wrote:I figured out your a fraud.
Interesting. You could just disagree, or disregard the article instead of acting like an a--hole.
Why did you choose that path?
Did it fill in some insecurities today?Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")0 -
RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:Interesting. You could just disagree, or disregard the article instead of acting like an a--hole.
Why did you choose that path?
Did it fill in some insecurities today?
what is with you lately taking the high almighty path? since I've been here you have done nothing BUT act like an ahole. all of your responses are immature yet you have the audacity to say people are immature around here. the thread maker makes constant rips at people for reading .COM sites. yet here he is posting one. yea, I dont feel bad for calling him out.0 -
lazymoon13 wrote:such a sheep following those .COM sites. enjoy being spoon fed?
Actually our entire government has, for a great many years, been in defiance of the Constitution."When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul0 -
ok and what does that have to do with browsing .com sites?mammasan wrote:Actually our entire government has, for a great many years, been in defiance of the Constitution.0 -
lazymoon13 wrote:ok and what does that have to do with browsing .com sites?
I'm assuming that your comment was in reference to him obtaining that article on the internet. When in fact the article, as well as the OP, are correct.."When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul0 -
mammasan wrote:I'm assuming that your comment was in reference to him obtaining that article on the internet. When in fact the article, as well as the OP, are correct..
no, I find it ironic that the OP posted a .com site. I guess he only thinks they are ok when they fit his agenda. I'm sure the article is just fine.0 -
0
-
lazymoon13 wrote:what is with you lately taking the high almighty path? since I've been here you have done nothing BUT act like an ahole. all of your responses are immature yet you have the audacity to say people are immature around here. the thread maker makes constant rips at people for reading .COM sites. yet here he is posting one. yea, I dont feel bad for calling him out.
Oh ok... old wound for you... I see..Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")0 -
lazymoon13 wrote:no, I find it ironic that the OP posted a .com site. I guess he only thinks they are ok when they fit his agenda. I'm sure the article is just fine.
Point taken but that still doesn't dicredit the legitemacy of what the article states."When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul0 -
lazymoon13 wrote:no, I find it ironic that the OP posted a .com site. I guess he only thinks they are ok when they fit his agenda. I'm sure the article is just fine.
first i would like to say... you don't know what ironic means apparently.
that article is taken from NADER.ORG ... it isnt NADER.COM
I DONT HAVE AN AGENDA!!!!
if you want to be clueless on society and the reality in which it operates fine... stop coming into my threads and posting childish bullshit.
you didnt even read the article and you post on it... wtf is that??
i will gladly accept my ban moderators, but i really think you should examine your policies and realize there are much greater offences in this post than me writing ''ya fucking moron''0 -
macgyver06 wrote:first i would like to say... you don't know what ironic means apparently.
that article is taken from NADER.ORG ya fucking moron... it isnt NADER.COM
I DONT HAVE AN AGENDA!!!!
IM NOT MAKING MONEY TRYING TO ENLIGHTEN FUCKING RETARDS...
if you want to be clueless on society and the reality in which it operates fine... stop coming into my threads and posting childish bullshit.
you didnt even read the article and you post on it... wtf is that??
i will gladly accept my ban moderators, but i really think you should examine your policies and realize there are much greater offences in this post than me writing ''ya fucking moron''
are you saying everyone here is a retard...?
kinda harsh, don't a think..?0 -
macgyver06 wrote:first i would like to say... you don't know what ironic means apparently.
that article is taken from NADER.ORG ya fucking moron... it isnt NADER.COM
I DONT HAVE AN AGENDA!!!!
IM NOT MAKING MONEY TRYING TO ENLIGHTEN FUCKING RETARDS...
if you want to be clueless on society and the reality in which it operates fine... stop coming into my threads and posting childish bullshit.
you didnt even read the article and you post on it... wtf is that??
i will gladly accept my ban moderators, but i really think you should examine your policies and realize there are much greater offences in this post than me writing ''ya fucking moron''
enjoy your ban0 -
inmytree wrote:are you saying everyone here is a retard...?
kinda harsh, don't a think..?
damn you are special.0 -
macgyver06 wrote:first i would like to say... you don't know what ironic means apparently.
that article is taken from NADER.ORG ya fucking moron... it isnt NADER.COM
I DONT HAVE AN AGENDA!!!!
IM NOT MAKING MONEY TRYING TO ENLIGHTEN FUCKING RETARDS...
if you want to be clueless on society and the reality in which it operates fine... stop coming into my threads and posting childish bullshit.
you didnt even read the article and you post on it... wtf is that??
i will gladly accept my ban moderators, but i really think you should examine your policies and realize there are much greater offences in this post than me writing ''ya fucking moron''
Well see...now you just outed yourself and proved you are in fact a secret operative.
The boss ain't gonna be happy. I'll try to put in a good word for you at headquarters.Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")0 -
lazymoon13 wrote:enjoy your ban
Attack the poster not the information...is what you did.
Man this place is so friggin lame from this type of mentality.Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")0 -
RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:Well see...now you just outed yourself and proved you are in fact a secret operative.
The boss ain't gonna be happy. I'll try to put in a good word for you at headquarters.
its how I operate
there should be an age limit on this board apparently.. never thought i would ever say this. or make people take a general exam on how to read and break things down to discover main points.
and of course there has to be a fact and opinion section.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 275 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help