Home› A Moving Train

endorsing an old republican from texas

macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
edited January 2008 in A Moving Train
need i say more..ive been telling you guys..ive known of paul a long long time and it was only a matter of perfect timing to destroy his campaign.


and by the way


HE HAS NO INTENTION OF REMOVING TROOPS FROM IRAQ YOU BLIND FOOLS!
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • DPrival78DPrival78 CT Posts: 2,263
    macgyver06 wrote:
    HE HAS NO INTENTION OF REMOVING TROOPS FROM IRAQ YOU BLIND FOOLS!

    what makes you think that?
    i'm more a fan of popular bands.. like the bee-gees, pearl jam
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    DPrival78 wrote:
    what makes you think that?

    because the troops are guarding the oil fields

    NO ONE IS GOING TO LET HIM REMOVE THE TROOPS...
    AND HE KNOWS THIS AND DOESNT MIND LYING TO YOU!
  • DriftingByTheStormDriftingByTheStorm Posts: 8,684
    macgyver06 wrote:
    because the troops are guarding the oil fields

    NO ONE IS GOING TO LET HIM REMOVE THE TROOPS...
    AND HE KNOWS THIS AND DOESNT MIND LYING TO YOU!

    uh.
    given that the war is NOT declared,
    he has TOTAL AUTHORITY to remove the troops.

    Congress has power of the purse.

    Remember that.
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    DriftingByTheStorm wrote:
    uh.
    given that the war is NOT declared,
    he has TOTAL AUTHORITY to remove the troops.

    Congress has power of the purse.

    Remember that.


    ok so you are saying...he will pull all troops out of iraq like he has promised..and leave the oil fields to whom??? israel??
  • DriftingByTheStormDriftingByTheStorm Posts: 8,684
    macgyver06 wrote:
    ok so you are saying...he will pull all troops out of iraq like he has promised..and leave the oil fields to whom??? israel??

    The companies that own them, and under the protection of the laws of the country which we invaded.
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • godpt3godpt3 Posts: 1,020
    Ron Paul is our revenge for the little Ralph Nader stunt the GOP pulled in 2000.

    Ron Paul... the gift that keeps on giving!
    "If all those sweet, young things were laid end to end, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised."
    —Dorothy Parker

    http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    DriftingByTheStorm wrote:
    The companies that own them, and under the protection of the laws of the country which we invaded.


    sorry... i just dont buy it... ron paul is pro oil...no way he is abandoning those oil fields...and even if he wanted to... he will be assasinated before he gets the job done.
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    godpt3 wrote:
    Ron Paul is our revenge for the little Ralph Nader stunt the GOP pulled in 2000.

    Ron Paul... the gift that keeps on giving!


    whats wrong with ralph nader? and for the record...ron paul cant touch ralph nader.
  • DPrival78DPrival78 CT Posts: 2,263
    macgyver06 wrote:
    he will be assasinated before he gets the job done.

    you're probably right about that.

    being realistic, i know the chances of ron paul being elected president are beyond miniscule. but i'm supporting him more for the message than anything else. he's bringing some very important issues to the light (the fed, globalist ambitions, etc) and he's getting a lot of people involved. i look at his campaign as a real beginning of some kind of large scale awakening, and the longer he can stay in it, the more it will spread. and hopefully, when the campaign does come to an end, whenever or however that may be, the movement won't.
    i'm more a fan of popular bands.. like the bee-gees, pearl jam
  • LikeAnOpeningBandForTheSunLikeAnOpeningBandForTheSun Posts: 6,097
    so next I'll be hearing about Kucinich lying about bringing the troops home. Why would paul lie? he would get more votes in the primaries if he supported the war.

    oh wait, its macguyver. nevermind.
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    DPrival78 wrote:
    you're probably right about that.

    being realistic, i know the chances of ron paul being elected president are beyond miniscule. but i'm supporting him more for the message than anything else. he's bringing some very important issues to the light (the fed, globalist ambitions, etc) and he's getting a lot of people involved. i look at his campaign as a real beginning of some kind of large scale awakening, and the longer he can stay in it, the more it will spread. and hopefully, when the campaign does come to an end, whenever or however that may be, the movement won't.


    i dont hate the guy..i like him... also i think the awakening was started before him... the fact that more and more people are voting for third candidates (WHICH THEY SHOULD) regardless of what people tell them..


    although hw is running as a republican...i think he is running like a third party candidate..which is very smart..and while he may not win this year... he is setting more ground for elections to come...

    just like nader did... dems and republicans now steal a lot of his ideas in hopes to gain that percentage of people who voted for him...which is what will happen 4 years from now...ron pauls ideas will not go unnoticed and will be utilized in elections to come... so even if he loses...its still a success...and youve got to keep voting for who YOU think is the best...not just because you think they can win.
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    MrSmith wrote:
    so next I'll be hearing about Kucinich lying about bringing the troops home. Why would paul lie? he would get more votes in the primaries if he supported the war.

    oh wait, its macguyver. nevermind.


    the only one who is crazy enough to pull all troops out of Iraq is Kucinich and Gravel.. and i think they should if they got elected...but i dont think ron paul will and i think i have a good reason for that..
  • DriftingByTheStormDriftingByTheStorm Posts: 8,684
    macgyver06 wrote:
    sorry... i just dont buy it... ron paul is pro oil...no way he is abandoning those oil fields...and even if he wanted to... he will be assasinated before he gets the job done.
    where are you pulling this "pro-oil" crap from?

    Ron is only pro-free-market and pro-trade and ANTI-occupation.

    :(
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • RolandTD20KdrummerRolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    The one thing I would disagree with is yanking the troops all at once. It has to be phased down gradually, otherwise it's a recipe for chaos.

    I think RP's stance on "just coming home" hurts his chances.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    macgyver06 wrote:
    because the troops are guarding the oil fields

    NO ONE IS GOING TO LET HIM REMOVE THE TROOPS...
    AND HE KNOWS THIS AND DOESNT MIND LYING TO YOU!

    you become more clueless by the day. its scary.
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    jlew24asu wrote:
    you become more clueless by the day. its scary.


    huffing paint fumes will do that to a person....:)
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    jlew24asu wrote:
    you become more clueless by the day. its scary.

    your replies become more and more insignificant by the day. its expected.
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    macgyver06 wrote:
    your replies become more and more insignificant by the day. its expected.

    atta boy good comeback! now if you only had a clue about any polices of ron paul you might hold an ounce of credibility.
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    jlew24asu wrote:
    atta boy good comeback! now if you only had a clue about any polices of ron paul you might hold an ounce of credibility.


    actually i know all his policies and wisely call bullshit...because jlew...i will fill you in on something...why you are staring through a little hole and hitting a button which will ultimately lead to elementary snap shots...i am thinking...and taking in ron pauls voting record...and than piecing together what he talks about... and if you understood how to decipher words and opinions with fact and reality you would see ron paul is living in a movie... except he isnt the star... its the ron paul supporters... commencing reply in ...
    3.....2.....1.... rollllling.....action



    GO JLEW!
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    macgyver06 wrote:
    because the troops are guarding the oil fields

    NO ONE IS GOING TO LET HIM REMOVE THE TROOPS...
    AND HE KNOWS THIS AND DOESNT MIND LYING TO YOU!

    how do you know this? and why should oil fields not be guarded by troops? oil is a very valuable world commodity.

    you said NO ONE is going to remove the troops from the oil fields right? will gravel?
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    macgyver06 wrote:
    actually i know all his policies and wisely call bullshit...because jlew...i will fill you in on something...why you are staring through a little hole and hitting a button which will ultimately lead to elementary snap shots...i am thinking...and taking in ron pauls voting record...and than piecing together what he talks about... and if you understood how to decipher words and opinions with fact and reality you would see ron paul is living in a movie... except he isnt the star... its the ron paul supporters... commencing reply in ...
    3.....2.....1.... rollllling.....action



    GO JLEW!

    I'm not defending ron paul. I'm simply stating the fact that you really dont know shit about the guy.
Sign In or Register to comment.