I think the winner of the "debate" is....

freindlyfired

whichever one has more make-up on.

whichever one said Bin Laden, Alqeada, 9-11 and Iraq more than the other

whichever one didnt answer direct questions the most

whichever one said my fellow americans last

whichever one blamed the opposing party more than the other

whichever one took more drinks of water than the other

whichever one said something before, after he said something after or before

whichever one blah blah blah...

Cosmo

Actually... the winners are the fuckface Political Pundits that'll get weeks worth of verbal regurgitation to spew from those boxes of fear that dominate American living rooms in order to accomplish the highest goal any American can achieve... the highest ratings.

chikevin

Cosmo wrote:

Actually... the winners are the fuckface Political Pundits that'll get weeks worth of verbal regurgitation to spew from those boxes of fear that dominate American living rooms in order to accomplish the highest goal any American can achieve... the highest ratings.

that's not exactly true.

i've seen on a few different networks some pundits say the candidate who comes out on the short side of the stick with regards to all pundits generally wins with the american people.
now, i'm on board with 'the person who wins the soundbite, wins the debate', but from what i understand, those who are undecided to necessarily listen to just the soundbite.

Cosmo

chikevin wrote:

that's not exactly true.

i've seen on a few different networks some pundits say the candidate who comes out on the short side of the stick with regards to all pundits generally wins with the american people.
now, i'm on board with 'the person who wins the soundbite, wins the debate', but from what i understand, those who are undecided to necessarily listen to just the soundbite.

...
Well... if the election hinges on people who make their decisions based upon (usually, taken out of context) soundbites... what does that tell you about us... as a nation?
Hey America!!! Try turning off the T.V. for a change... and try picking up a fucking newspaper and reading it. If you have any problems with that... look up the Transcripts and read them in full context. And while you're at it... How about DECIDING ON YOUR OWN, huh? You DON'T need some fuck on T.V. to give you your opinion.

CHANGEinWAVES

i think it boils down to that fact that WE'RE the losers:(

chikevin

Cosmo wrote:

...
Well... if the election hinges on people who make their decisions based upon (usually, taken out of context) soundbites... what does that tell you about us... as a nation?
Hey America!!! Try turning off the T.V. for a change... and try picking up a fucking newspaper and reading it. If you have any problems with that... look up the Transcripts and read them in full context. And while you're at it... How about DECIDING ON YOUR OWN, huh? You DON'T need some fuck on T.V. to give you your opinion.

what country are you living in?

don't say you don't think opinions matter....cause they do.
whether you agree with them or not, those who 'don't know' look for guidance.

not everyone is as smart as you.

manipulatedliving

http://www.poohfriends.com/modules/coppermine/albums/Avatars/gopher/thumb_gopher02.jpg Did anyone notice that this must be the long lost cousin of John Mccain?

Commy

not much of a debate. The questions about foreign policy weren't about IF we should get involved they were about HOW we should get involved. We being the United States. Both candidates were fine in regurgitating conventional ideology, both seemed fine carrying out traditional foreign policy, which really hasn't changed in over 60 years.

Obama almost had my vote.