FBI: Not a scrap of evidence linking 9/11 hijackers

RolandTD20Kdrummer

http://existentialistcowboy.blogspot.com/2008/03/lie-called-911-why-federal-grand-jury.html

"Several mainstream media have reported 'living hijackers'. Pro-government conspiracy theorists cannot explain the fact that numerous 'hijackers', found on the FBI's list of suspects, are still alive and giving interviews."

" Alleged hijackers on Flight 77 - Nawaf Al-Hazmi , Khalid Al-Midhar

As an aside, I think it interesting that a hijacking 'suspect' should 'protest his innocence'. If he were guilty, he would be dead, incapable of protest! Being alive, however, is compelling evidence that he is not only innocent, but that Bush's official conspiracy theory is a pack of lies just as were his allegations of WMD in Iraq."

"FBI Director Robert Mueller admitted that the FBI had no evidence to link the 19 'Muslim men' who have apparently disappeared --neither on the autopsy list or the original 'official flight manifests'. In speech to the Common Wealth Club in San Francisco on April 19, 2003, Mueller stated that the purported hijackers 'left no paper trial'. "In our investigation", he said: "we have not uncovered a single piece of paper - either here in the United States or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere - that mentioned any aspect of the Sept. 11 plot."

lazymoon13

what about the airport surveillance videos that show those guys checking in? or the airline employees who checked them in? thats considered a "scrap" no? someone else posted something about people being really naive around here. I mean, you read something from The Existentialist Cowboy blog and use it as an air tight case that muslims weren't on any of the hijacked planes. :eek:

theroachman

If I recall correctly this was one of the first things I heard that led me to believe there was another explanation as to how these terrorist were so successful. When the government seems to be so blatantly covering up facts about such events is it any wonder why movies like Loose Change are ever made?

RolandTD20Kdrummer

lazymoon13 wrote:

what about the airport surveillance videos that show those guys checking in? or the airline employees who checked them in? thats considered a "scrap" no? someone else posted something about people being really naive around here. I mean, you read something from The Existentialist Cowboy blog and use it as an air tight case that muslims weren't on any of the hijacked planes. :eek:

I know you believe the official 9/11 story already Jlew

DriftingByTheStorm

lazymoon13 wrote:

what about the airport surveillance videos that show those guys checking in?

I don't doubt that some of those alleged hijackers were on those planes, but that airport surveillance footage raises more questions than it answers.

Primarily, why is the footage (much like the only stills released from the cameras of the london bombings, which some some claim is altered) missing it's date\time stamp?

All security camera footage contains this date\time stamp for a reason. Think about it.

Yet the footage we are shown of these men passing security to board is clearly missing this date\time stamp.

Why?

Anyhow.

lazymoon13

DriftingByTheStorm wrote:

I don't doubt that some of those alleged hijackers were on those planes, but that airport surveillance footage raises more questions than it answers.

Primarily, why is the footage (much like the only stills released from the cameras of the london bombings, which some some claim is altered) missing it's date\time stamp?

All security camera footage contains this date\time stamp for a reason. Think about it.

Yet the footage we are shown of these men passing security to board is clearly missing this date\time stamp.

Why?

Anyhow.

thats a fine point that I don't have an answer for. but what about the airline employees that checked them in? or are they in on it? I have seen them interviewed before.

DriftingByTheStorm

lazymoon13 wrote:

thats a fine point that I don't have an answer for. but what about the airline employees that checked them in? or are they in on it? I have seen them interviewed before.

I don't know.
Like i said, i'm not saying that those men weren't on those planes.
I'm saying it raises more questions than it answers.
Another one being, why would a terrorist who plans to board a plane and die pack his flight backs (luggage) with all his identifying papers and the sole finalized copy of his Last Will And Testament. Further, why was that bag NOT put on the flight. The government claims to have identified him because his bag was held for inspection and missed the luggage loading, and thus did not make it on the flight. Convenient huh? But why would you bring your WILL on a flight that you were going to crash and burn?

History has shown (if you take the conspiratorial view) that the way these things occur is with "real" "terrorists" who were mobilized and allowed to go through with their actions (usualy with lots of "help" from the CIA or in some cases the FBI).

Check out the first bombing of the WTC.
Why did the FBI give one of their informant\operative arabs parts to make a real bomb and tell him to deliver them to known terrorists, and then NOT follow through with what they alleged was a "sting" operation.

Pretty lousy "sting" if you fail to actualy catch the guys YOU provided with bomb materials.

This is a classic MO.
Supervisor `Messed It Up' ...

see?
You just enable the "enemy" and then you have one guy at the top foil any attempt at catching them before the incident occurs.

Certainly you would agree that on 911 someone (or several people) at NORAD "Messed it up" with regards to scrambling fighters and using our multi trillion dollar defense system to catch 3 lousy planes flying around without transponders. NYC and DC being the most heavily scrutinized airspace in the country. DC in particular having billions of dolllars in aerospace defense contingencies.

And that doesn't even get us to all the claims by field agents at the FBI who claim (and several, who have actualy SUED the government) for blocking \ stopping \ hindering \ derailing and otherwise infringing on the investigation of what was known by them to be plans of muslim terrorists to use planes to attack sensitive targets in America.

Nor does it start to analyze why several of the hijackers were trained at various different high level government\military training camps\bases within the past 10 years. Or why several of these terrorists were known to be living in America at the time, and some of them even had landlords that were CIA or intelligence agency operatives.