One world currency...do you think it's coming?

RolandTD20Kdrummer

I caught this clip of Glen Beck, I'd like to see the rest of it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKsiZdOD5u4

This sounds pretty outrageous, and frightening at the same time.

I thought it would only be North America to form a unified currency, it seems perhaps the sights have been set a little higher...

What do you imagine the repercussions would be to having one global currency?

Is this new world order by default? i.e. "give me control of a nations money and I care not who makes it's laws"?!?

DriftingByTheStorm

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

I caught this clip of Glen Beck, I'd like to see the rest of it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKsiZdOD5u4

This sounds pretty outrageous, and frightening at the same time.

I thought it would only be North America to form a unified currency, it seems perhaps the sights have been set a little higher...

What do you imagine the repercussions would be to having one global currency?

Is this new world order by default? i.e. "give me control of a nations money and I care not who makes it's laws"?!?

Wow.
Glen Beck is starting to sound like Alex Jones.
And i'm not sure that is a bad thing.

"Endgame"
"New World Order"
"New Financial Order"
"One World Currency"
"One World Financial System"

ooh boy.

I do know this,
this Sarkozy fuck (french president, sitting EU president) is extremely tight with the Rothschilds. So anything coming out of his mouth regarding world financial regulation or such you can immediately take to be NWO propaganda, through and through.

I think a "one world currency" is a few years off, at best.
Getting rid of the dollar is going to be a monumental task,
and right now there is NO reason to. It has had a ridiculous rebound (now around 83 on the USDX) thanks to the rest of the world inflating to match.

But this talk of a "New World Financial Order" should be very concerning to all.
The fat cats at the top of the top are jumping all over themselves to pull this off. It's their fucking wetdream.

And if they get their carbon tax\carbon credit legislation pushed through (and they WILL), they WILL have a "one world currency" of sorts.

Carbon credits will simply replace gold and any other medium (like "IMF Credits") as the global reserve currency (from the horses mouth) ... ugh.

The future is looking more like an Alex Jones nightmare by the minute.
:( :mad: :eek: :(

prytoj

There will be no Amero. We will not be a part of a North American Union, and America will have no part of a One World Government

Too many Americans, myself included, will outright revolt.

For mor ifno on this fight and what you can do check out

http://www.conservativeusa.org/

Yeah, it's a conservative sight, but these guys are at the frontlines against the attack on our sovereignty. And right on the money here.

Probably the biggest challenge America will ever have faced...glad it's getting more attention.

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

I caught this clip of Glen Beck, I'd like to see the rest of it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKsiZdOD5u4

This sounds pretty outrageous, and frightening at the same time.

I thought it would only be North America to form a unified currency, it seems perhaps the sights have been set a little higher...

What do you imagine the repercussions would be to having one global currency?

Is this new world order by default? i.e. "give me control of a nations money and I care not who makes it's laws"?!?

g under p

YES, you know what's happening with the stock markets and the economy is NOT by accident. Someone already coin it an Economic 9/II to later implement the system of their choosing.

Peace

Drowned Out

I know absolutely nothing about Hal Turner, so if you're going to bash me for posting one of his clips, be gentle I stumbled across this yesterday:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ge2J2lNusJs&eurl=http://waronyou.com/2008/10/hal-turner-shows-new-amero-currency

Even if he's a complete fraud, and the amero he's holding is fake, he describes how the amero would/could come about in this vblog.

Personally....I think it's coming, yes (and not because of this clip) edit: the amero, that is....If a one world currency is on the horizon, it's probably a long way off).

Commy

g under p wrote:

YES, you know what's happening with the stock markets and the economy is NOT by accident. Someone already coin it an Economic 9/II to later implement the system of their choosing.

Peace

Yeah, Reagan pulled that shit in the 80's. It was a trillion dollar turn around. 1 trillion dollars were shifted in the system. Most of it went to already very wealthy corporations. It was the beginning (I think) of modern neo liberalism. So many social programs were cut I can't name them all, won't even try. And wages dropped, unions were rendered impotent, to some extent, the poor got poorer and the rich got richer.

And this shift of tax dollars from public programs to the private sector, its only been increased, and this current crisis gives them plenty of reasons to expand on those same neoliberal bullshit socialist policies Reagan initiated in the 80's.

If it is an economic 9/11, I'm beginning to think the US was behind the real 9/11, since this crisis is only going to help big business.

Government guaranteeing private profit, seems to be their primary role.

redmosquito10

i hope so. all this nationalism never really made sense to me anyways, we're all human aren't we? and to those who panic that the world economy would fall apart, etc. etc., at its root, people control the economy, it's a man-made creation, so lets tweak it and make it work

LikeAnOpeningBandForTheSun

they should just call it the dollar, then we'd get behind it.

wait, isnt that already the world currency?

prytoj

redmosquito10 wrote:

i hope so. all this nationalism never really made sense to me anyways,

I suspect you're too busy to find out, also.
yours is a sentiment that really frightens me...

Lesbelges

No way in hell it's ever going to happen any time soon!

Anyone who thinks this is possible does not have knowledge of basic macro economics.

If there was a single currency then no country would be able to manage its monetary policy (i.e. No Fed) i.e.:

-No increasing/decreasing money supply
-No cutting/raising interest rates

Here are some examples:
-Imagine if the US was experiencing high inflation (which is fought by reducing the money supply or by increasing interest rates) well the US would not be able to do anything since it would not have those tools.

Now, I think that for the world as a whole and very idealistically this would be a great idea. However, I don't think that the US would ever go for a single world currency while it is still a super power.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

These quotes from David Rockefeller send a chill down my spine. I can only imagine what the Rothschild's say behind closed doors. This guy is one whacked out and demented dude... He's 93...so that's some kind of solace.


"Some even believe we (Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - One World, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."
- David Rockefeller, Memoirs, 2002

"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a World Government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."
- David Rockefeller to Trilateral Commission in 1991

"You know, gentlemen, that I do not owe any personal income tax. But nevertheless, I send a small check, now and then, to the Internal Revenue Service out of the kindness of my heart."
- David Rockefeller, before a Congressional Committee

prytoj

Lesbelges wrote:

Now, I think that for the world as a whole and very idealistically this would be a great idea. However, I don't think that the US would ever go for a single world currency while it is still a super power.

We invented democracy, we invented free market capitalism.
Why is there so much sentiment to worry about what the relative baby
democracies, or any other society, think?

I used to think my dad was an overbearing a-hole gorwing up...but then I grew up...and I see he was right certainly more often that I was..

This just seems so crazy to me, this globalist ideal. Why not just take a match to the constitution while you're at it?

DriftingByTheStorm

prytoj wrote:

I suspect you're too busy to find out, also.
yours is a sentiment that really frightens me...

unfortunately, i understand redmosquito10's sentiment, and i to am afraid of what the seeming prevalence of such similar opinions portends for our and every country on earth.

I actually even sympathize with the notion that globalized communication and human integration should eventually lead to a global decision making process shared in equally by all nations. It sounds beautiful, and maybe there could be such a harmonious world someday.

However, the current reality is such that those pushing for all such global regulations are doing so to subserve the interests of at best 1% of humanity.

If your intentions with the abolition of nationalist interests is to promote the health and prosperity of all man kind, you should probably think twice about supporting any proposed eco-political decisions backed exclusively by the top 1% themselves.

???

Lesbelges

prytoj wrote:

We invented democracy, we invented free market capitalism.
Why is there so much sentiment to worry about what the relative baby
democracies, or any other society, think?

I used to think my dad was an overbearing a-hole gorwing up...but then I grew up...and I see he was right certainly more often that I was..

This just seems so crazy to me, this globalist ideal. Why not just take a match to the constitution while you're at it?

Maybe you misunderstood me, single currency and single government is just never going to happen.

Who are you saying invented democracy?

Commy

prytoj wrote:

We invented democracy, we invented free market capitalism.
Why is there so much sentiment to worry about what the relative baby
democracies, or any other society, think?

I used to think my dad was an overbearing a-hole gorwing up...but then I grew up...and I see he was right certainly more often that I was..

This just seems so crazy to me, this globalist ideal. Why not just take a match to the constitution while you're at it?

we invented democracy and "free market capitalism"? Really? damn. I had no idea.

So...why don't we practice any of them?

Nevermind

I thought the African people invented democracy.

Drowned Out

DriftingByTheStorm wrote:

unfortunately, i understand redmosquito10's sentiment, and i to am afraid of what the seeming prevalence of such similar opinions portends for our and every country on earth.

I actually even sympathize with the notion that globalized communication and human integration should eventually lead to a global decision making process shared in equally by all nations. It sounds beautiful, and maybe there could be such a harmonious world someday.

However, the current reality is such that those pushing for all such global regulations are doing so to subserve the interests of at best 1% of humanity.

If your intentions with the abolition of nationalist interests is to promote the health and prosperity of all man kind, you should probably think twice about supporting any proposed eco-political decisions backed exclusively by the top 1% themselves.

???

exactly. The movement we are talking about here has nothing to do humanitarian actions and philanthropy thru cooperation....the people pushin this agenda are the people behind the current economic sysem, which makes them the catalysts for every global issue or conflict involving money ( in other words EVERY issue or conflict).
We cannot support this particular globalist vision, or things will only get worse.

prytoj

That was a whole bunch of fancy, but you're correct.

The sentiment is increasing, and alarming.

And globalization sounds very pleasant and idealistic, but really means power consolidation,

Furthermore, it violates one of the founding priciples of our democracy: no taxation without representation! This is why one currency, one world government is impossible in America.

It's hard for the rules not to serve the 1%, since that's who makes them.

Why in the hell would you want an even more distant, more consolidated government?

If that's for you, may I suggest the European Union?
beautiful scam

DriftingByTheStorm wrote:

unfortunately, i understand redmosquito10's sentiment, and i to am afraid of what the seeming prevalence of such similar opinions portends for our and every country on earth.

I actually even sympathize with the notion that globalized communication and human integration should eventually lead to a global decision making process shared in equally by all nations. It sounds beautiful, and maybe there could be such a harmonious world someday.

However, the current reality is such that those pushing for all such global regulations are doing so to subserve the interests of at best 1% of humanity.

If your intentions with the abolition of nationalist interests is to promote the health and prosperity of all man kind, you should probably think twice about supporting any proposed eco-political decisions backed exclusively by the top 1% themselves.

???

DriftingByTheStorm

Lesbelges wrote:

Maybe you misunderstood me, single currency and single government is just never going to happen.

I don't think anyone of note (ok, outside of Glen Beck :cool:) has ever proposed a "one world currency", it's an oversimplification by Mr. Beck of an ideal held by a small cloister of the most greedy and powerhungry.

Regional currencies are certainly desirable by someone. One need only look at the euro to prove that one. The converse of your sentiment -- that the lack of autonomous fiscal control leads to an unmanageable economy -- is that such regionalization allows for a more tightly held power over a larger base. The Money Masters can pull a LOT of strings by affecting the inflation rate of an entire landmass.

However, getting away from his red-herring "global currency" misnomer ...

there are very real plans and desires to completely destroy and rebuild the existing financial order.

You need only open your ears and eyes to recognize this propaganda effort afoot by the elite everywhere. Sarkozy, Kissinger and his minions, the Rothschilds, Paulson, Bernanke, former Fed chairman, globalist class pet China, paid industry puppets (er,"analysts") on CNBC all day long ... EVERYWHERE ... you see these calls for "more global regulation" ...

and DO NOT BE FOOLED with the intent behind it folks.
DO NOT BE FOOLED!

RolandTD20Kdrummer

I'm beginning to see the latest steps Bush made to give the fed such broad and encompassing powers in a different light.

I wonder if they're going to use this latest financial global crisis to enact more and more laws to set the framework for more centralized control in order to "prevent" it from happening again. That was the excuse Bush made in the first place. Hell it's probably already there, and just needs a bit of red tape snipped away for all I know. Perhaps this is what they really get down to at the Bilderberg meetings. ???

Good ol top secret ultra elite Bilderberg meetings...that's just messed up right there btw.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies.
- Thomas Jefferson