Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Who says they want nuclear weapons? They officially say they want nuclear energy not weapons. Lots of people have it...why not them? They are not evil people.
The US says they want nukes. Bush would also love to attack Iran.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Who says they want nuclear weapons? They officially say they want nuclear energy not weapons. Lots of people have it...why not them? They are not evil people.
The US says they want nukes. Bush would also love to attack Iran.
then why wont they allow inspectors? why wont the follow UN resolutions? why wont they let Russia enrich it for them, which was offered?
you trust them to have weapons grade radioactive material?
of course the people are not evil. they are actually very good people. expect your buddies who chant Death to America as part of their daily prayers. and that crazy president and extremists shahs. yea, the people of Iran are not the problem.
then why wont they allow inspectors? why wont the follow UN resolutions? why wont they let Russia enrich it for them, which was offered?
you trust them to have weapons grade radioactive material?
of course the people are not evil. they are actually very good people. expect your buddies who chant Death to America as part of their daily prayers. and that crazy president and extremists shahs. yea, the people of Iran are not the problem.
Watch Rageh in Iran it explains a bit more why they chant Death to the US., it's more symbolic from a society perspective than literally. They are a simple people.
They would have to allow inspectors in I agree. They got fucked pretty hard by the US in the Iran/Iraq war. That is still really fresh (1980-1988).
They feel like they're getting screwed over by the US for a long time now.
They probably do want to get nukes, but not specifically to start launcing them. Nukes are more of a status symbol.
I think they are just tired of being the US's bitch.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
ok how about the direct quotes from an Iranian general?
"Today the Americans are around our country but this does not mean that they are encircling us. They are encircled themselves and are within our range," said Gen Mohammed Hassan Koussechi.
"If the United States is saying that they have identified 2,000 targets in Iran, then what is certain is that it is the Americans who are all around Iran and are equally our targets," he told the official IRNA news agency.
Gen Koussechi added: "We have reached capacities that allow us to hit the enemy at a range of 2,000 kilometres."
Sure in an earlier quote from you that you never heard the bullshit that Saddam could reach the states with his vast missiles that he had. And then you throw this up. Ah yeah, Jlew you keep spinning it boy!
Sure in an earlier quote from you that you never heard the bullshit that Saddam could reach the states with his vast missiles that he had. And then you throw this up. Ah yeah, Jlew you keep spinning it boy!
how is this my spin? I'm quoting the Iranian general
Watch Rageh in Iran it explains a bit more why they chant Death to the US., it's more symbolic from a society perspective than literally. They are a simple people.
They would have to allow inspectors in I agree. They got fucked pretty hard by the US in the Iran/Iraq war. That is still really fresh (1980-1988).
They feel like they're getting screwed over by the US for a long time now.
They probably do want to get nukes, but not specifically to start launcing them. Nukes are more of a status symbol.
I think they are just tired of being the US's bitch.
I did watch rageh of Iran. its a excellent documentary. then chant symbolizes hate. pure and simple. but great job trying to marginalize it.
you want to make the assumption that they will never use them, go ahead. you are probably right, but you might have a different opinion if they chanted death to canada everyday
I did watch rageh of Iran. its a excellent documentary. then chant symbolizes hate. pure and simple. but great job trying to marginalize it.
you want to make the assumption that they will never use them, go ahead. you are probably right, but you might have a different opinion if they chanted death to canada everyday
This is how they protest, because this is how they've been affected by foreign interests. If Canada had aided an 8 year adversarial war against them, attacked and occupied their neighbor across a vast ocean, and was now threatening them with yet another war. Probably.
Who has Iran attacked?
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Comments
ok and?
it's illegal...
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
so is Iran's desire for nuclear weapons.
Who says they want nuclear weapons? They officially say they want nuclear energy not weapons. Lots of people have it...why not them? They are not evil people.
The US says they want nukes. Bush would also love to attack Iran.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
then why wont they allow inspectors? why wont the follow UN resolutions? why wont they let Russia enrich it for them, which was offered?
you trust them to have weapons grade radioactive material?
of course the people are not evil. they are actually very good people. expect your buddies who chant Death to America as part of their daily prayers. and that crazy president and extremists shahs. yea, the people of Iran are not the problem.
Watch Rageh in Iran it explains a bit more why they chant Death to the US., it's more symbolic from a society perspective than literally. They are a simple people.
They would have to allow inspectors in I agree. They got fucked pretty hard by the US in the Iran/Iraq war. That is still really fresh (1980-1988).
They feel like they're getting screwed over by the US for a long time now.
They probably do want to get nukes, but not specifically to start launcing them. Nukes are more of a status symbol.
I think they are just tired of being the US's bitch.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Sure in an earlier quote from you that you never heard the bullshit that Saddam could reach the states with his vast missiles that he had. And then you throw this up. Ah yeah, Jlew you keep spinning it boy!
how is this my spin? I'm quoting the Iranian general
I did watch rageh of Iran. its a excellent documentary. then chant symbolizes hate. pure and simple. but great job trying to marginalize it.
you want to make the assumption that they will never use them, go ahead. you are probably right, but you might have a different opinion if they chanted death to canada everyday
This is how they protest, because this is how they've been affected by foreign interests. If Canada had aided an 8 year adversarial war against them, attacked and occupied their neighbor across a vast ocean, and was now threatening them with yet another war. Probably.
Who has Iran attacked?
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")