Home› A Moving Train

Pelosi Says She Would Impeach Bush If Somebody Knew of a Crime He'd Committed...

RolandTD20KdrummerRolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
edited July 2008 in A Moving Train
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/35102

"Pelosi told "The View" today that she'd impeach Bush if anybody knew of a crime he'd committed, just as she told Ed Schultz a year ago. Here's a list of crimes (PDF) drawn up by Conyers 2.5 years ago. And here's a list of crimes (PDF) from Kucinich's articles of impeachment drawn up by Elizabeth de la Vega.

Could a few thousand people fax these to her please?
Fax: 202-225-8259, Phone: 202-225-0100, Email: AmericanVoices@mail.house.gov or sf.nancy@mail.house.gov

Could someone also deliver them to her at her appearance with Politics and Prose bookstore of Washington, D.C., on Saturday, August 2 at 3 p.m. at Friendship Heights Village Center, 4433 S. Park Avenue, Chevy Chase, Maryland. (There is no cost for this event. Please sign up in advance by calling the Village Center at 301-656-2797.)

Bush has repeatedly instructed current and former staffers to refuse to comply with subpoenas and contempt citations.

Bush has violated numerous laws and claimed the right to do so in signing statements, as documented by the Government Accountability Office.

To watch a video of Bush admitting to violating FISA (thereby committing numerous felonies) go to the White House website here, and watch the December 19, 2005, press conference. You'll notice that Bush claims he began these crimes after September 11, 2001, which is not true; he began them earlier. You'll notice that Bush claims to have legal justification for violating the law, but those claims have completely collapsed. He also claims the spying is limited in ways that it is not. And when asked why he didn't try to change the law rather than violating it, he said he just doesn't have to because he's the president.

Does Pelosi subscribe to the belief that torture was ever legal?"

"Can I lick your balls again for you most noble sir"
http://lastrow.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/george-bush-and-nancy-pelosi.jpg
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.

http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • rocketmanrocketman Posts: 68
    What are you nuts? The only smart thing George W did in the last 8 years was pick Dick Cheney as VP. Impeach Bush and you get President Cheney. Yeah. Impeachment. Brilliant.
  • MrBrianMrBrian Posts: 2,672
    rocketman wrote:
    What are you nuts? The only smart thing George W did in the last 8 years was pick Dick Cheney as VP. Impeach Bush and you get President Cheney. Yeah. Impeachment. Brilliant.

    That makes Bush smart or the country stupid for electing him in the first place?
  • SVRDhand13SVRDhand13 Posts: 26,583
    rocketman wrote:
    What are you nuts? The only smart thing George W did in the last 8 years was pick Dick Cheney as VP. Impeach Bush and you get President Cheney. Yeah. Impeachment. Brilliant.
    Haha funny point. You think Cheney shot a guy on accident? Bush had him do it to show how he'd be even worse a president. Congress doesn't want someone in office who would shoot them in the face.
    severed hand thirteen
    2006: Gorge 7/23 2008: Hartford 6/27 Beacon 7/1 2009: Spectrum 10/30-31
    2010: Newark 5/18 MSG 5/20-21 2011: PJ20 9/3-4 2012: Made In America 9/2
    2013: Brooklyn 10/18-19 Philly 10/21-22 Hartford 10/25 2014: ACL10/12
    2015: NYC 9/23 2016: Tampa 4/11 Philly 4/28-29 MSG 5/1-2 Fenway 8/5+8/7
    2017: RRHoF 4/7   2018: Fenway 9/2+9/4   2021: Sea Hear Now 9/18 
    2022: MSG 9/11  2024: MSG 9/3-4 Philly 9/7+9/9 Fenway 9/15+9/17
    2025: Pittsburgh 5/16+5/18
  • RolandTD20KdrummerRolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    rocketman wrote:
    What are you nuts? The only smart thing George W did in the last 8 years was pick Dick Cheney as VP. Impeach Bush and you get President Cheney. Yeah. Impeachment. Brilliant.

    Who needs laws, and rules, and all that crap right?

    um...yeah...
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • down_skidown_ski Posts: 328
    MrBrian wrote:
    That makes Bush smart or the country stupid for electing him in the first place?

    Considering the other options were Gore or Kerry/Edwards? Leaning towards smart, unfortunately!

    My GOD EDWARDS FAKE BAKES!
  • DriftingByTheStormDriftingByTheStorm Posts: 8,684
    rocketman wrote:
    What are you nuts? The only smart thing George W did in the last 8 years was pick Dick Cheney as VP. Impeach Bush and you get President Cheney. Yeah. Impeachment. Brilliant.

    You could also impeach Cheney while you're at it.

    It's in the constitution,
    might as well give it a read while its still technicaly our supreme law of the land, Mr. Brilliant.

    :D
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • unsungunsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    Pelosi is probably a bigger idiot than Bush.
  • beachdwellerbeachdweller Posts: 1,532
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/35102

    "Pelosi told "The View" today that she'd impeach Bush if anybody knew of a crime he'd committed, just as she told Ed Schultz a year ago. Here's a list of crimes (PDF) drawn up by Conyers 2.5 years ago. And here's a list of crimes (PDF) from Kucinich's articles of impeachment drawn up by Elizabeth de la Vega.

    Could a few thousand people fax these to her please?
    Fax: 202-225-8259, Phone: 202-225-0100, Email: AmericanVoices@mail.house.gov or sf.nancy@mail.house.gov

    Could someone also deliver them to her at her appearance with Politics and Prose bookstore of Washington, D.C., on Saturday, August 2 at 3 p.m. at Friendship Heights Village Center, 4433 S. Park Avenue, Chevy Chase, Maryland. (There is no cost for this event. Please sign up in advance by calling the Village Center at 301-656-2797.)

    Bush has repeatedly instructed current and former staffers to refuse to comply with subpoenas and contempt citations. stating executive privilige. Until it's proven it's not executive privilige, it's not breaking the law.[/color}

    Bush has violated numerous laws and claimed the right to do so in signing statements, as documented by the Government Accountability Office.signing statements have precedence, and have not been proven illegal or unconstitutional, so what's your point?

    To watch a video of Bush admitting to violating FISA (thereby committing numerous felonies) go to the White House website here, and watch the December 19, 2005, press conference. You'll notice that Bush claims he began these crimes after September 11, 2001, which is not true; he began them earlier. You'll notice that Bush claims to have legal justification for violating the law, but those claims have completely collapsed. He also claims the spying is limited in ways that it is not. And when asked why he didn't try to change the law rather than violating it, he said he just doesn't have to because he's the president.again, it hasn't been proven to be illegal, he's claiming privilige due to being at war. The supreme court has ruled on some of this, and if he goes against that now he'd be in trouble, but many of the specifics haven't been ruled about.

    Does Pelosi subscribe to the belief that torture was ever legal?"

    "Can I lick your balls again for you most noble sir"
    http://lastrow.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/george-bush-and-nancy-pelosi.jpg

    you ain't said nuthin yet....anyway, the reason many of these issue haven't been pushed before the supreme court in my opinion, is because the congressional leadership was aware and in the loop for these actions, and since we all know it's more important to keep your job than do your job well in politics, most either kept quiet, went along with, or agreed with actions taken.

    it's not black and white when so many of the people involved are also needed to take action against the president.

    it's a sad statement about our government, but even sadder is that it's happened before in the past.
    "Music, for me, was fucking heroin." eV (nothing Ed has said is more true for me personally than this quote)

    Stop by:
    http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=14678777351&ref=mf
  • RolandTD20KdrummerRolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    LOFL...they updated the article to include a demented joker like picture of her

    again that's....

    these two documents:

    http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/downloads/crisis/summary.pdf
    http://www.pubrecord.org/docs/vega/kucinich-bush-articles-of-impeachment-violations.pdf

    emailed to:

    AmericanVoices@mail.house.gov
    sf.nancy@mail.house.gov

    ;)

    xoxo
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • rocketmanrocketman Posts: 68
    MrBrian wrote:
    That makes Bush smart or the country stupid for electing him in the first place?
    No and Yes
  • rocketmanrocketman Posts: 68
    DriftingByTheStorm wrote:
    You could also impeach Cheney while you're at it.

    It's in the constitution,
    might as well give it a read while its still technicaly our supreme law of the land, Mr. Brilliant.

    :D
    That's Sir Brilliant. Maybe people should just get off their asses and vote very four years. Then you wouldn't have to whine on about impeachment.
Sign In or Register to comment.