The Flouridation debate

RolandTD20KdrummerRolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
edited March 2008 in A Moving Train
In industrialized societies, how many people are so poor they have no access to a toothbrush and toothpaste is what I'm wondering.

http://www.fluoridealert.org/health/brain/

video debate:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMhboAX4CMU
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.

http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • JzacurJzacur Posts: 64
    "Fluoridation is the most monstrously conceived and dangerous communist plot we have ever had to face. "

    Sorry I can never think about said topic without referencing Dr. Strangelove
    9/28/05 PNC Park Pittsburgh- 6/23/06 Mellon Arena Pittsburgh- 8/02/07 The Vic- 8/05/07- Lollapalooza 6/22/08 DC
  • In industrialized societies, how many people are so poor they have no access to a toothbrush and toothpaste is what I'm wondering.

    http://www.fluoridealert.org/health/brain/

    video debate:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMhboAX4CMU


    all this time and that is what you've been wondering??

    clearly this is a grand conspiracy!

    :)
    we don’t know just where our bones will rest,
    to dust i guess,
    forgotten and absorbed into the earth below,..
  • lazymoon13lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    all this time and that is what you've been wondering??

    clearly this is a grand conspiracy!

    :)

    LOL where does one come up with this stuff? I never thought I'd meet someone who's been to the end of the internet and back.
  • all this time and that is what you've been wondering??

    clearly this is a grand conspiracy!

    :)

    The argument is purely against tooth decay v.s. the associated health issues.

    How much does toothpaste cost in your neck of the woods?

    seen many people so poor they can't afford a toothpaste in industrialized societies have you?

    So ask yourself why is it still in the water then regardless of how you want to perceive it.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • wolfbearwolfbear Posts: 3,965
    I think like most things, there are positives and negatives. I voted against it in our city, but in some areas it might be beneficial. :)
    "I'd rather be with an animal." "Those that can be trusted can change their mind." "The in between is mine." "If I don't lose control, explore and not explode, a preternatural other plane with the power to maintain." "Yeh this is living." "Life is what you make it."
  • wolfbear wrote:
    I think like most things, there are positives and negatives. I voted against it in our city, but in some areas it might be beneficial. :)


    Yeah but...what areas? Third world perhaps... Drinking water is not going to brush your teeth for you, and everyone brushes their teeth. Are we talking some kind of dental crutch forcefully imposed in modernized societies to help compensate for the lazy people that don't brush or what? that seems not appropriate. given the effects noted on the brain.

    Even if there was one health risk to cause damage to the brain, it should be dumped, and people should do what their parents told them as children.

    I'm glad I don't drink fluoride. Studies have shown it lowers the IQ.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    Yeah but...what areas? Third world perhaps... Drinking water is not going to brush your teeth for you, and everyone brushes their teeth. Are we talking some kind of dental crutch forcefully imposed in modernized societies to help compensate for the lazy people that don't brush or what? that seems not appropriate. given the effects noted on the brain.

    Even if there was one health risk to cause damage to the brain, it should be dumped, and people should do what their parents told them as children.

    I'm glad I don't drink fluoride. Studies have shown it lowers the IQ.

    studies? what studies? perhaps the people in those studies were stupid to begin with. the water i drink is flouridated and i have no doubt my IQ has not suffered. nor has that of my children. or anyone else i know who wasnt stupid in the first place. :p:D
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • studies? what studies? perhaps the people in those studies were stupid to begin with. the water i drink is flouridated and i have no doubt my IQ has not suffered. nor has that of my children. or anyone else i know who wasnt stupid in the first place. :p:D

    according to data provided the first link in the OP...
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • ClimberInOzClimberInOz Posts: 216
    That is an interesting study, but is a long way short of conclusive proof. There are many other variables that might have caused that difference in IQ. Schools, diet, other sources of flouride that occur naturally or from indoor burning of coal (I know the study reffered to coal pollution levels, but it did not specifically address the frequency of indoor coal burning- one of the biggest factors in flouride exposure in China).

    Show me another 5 independent studies, which better control the variables and you will certainly have my interest. But for now I think the weight of evidence indicates that flouridated drinking water (at a certain level- remember, flouride occurs in our drinking water naturally, we just top up the amount a litle) is good for teeth and has no statistically significant health risks.
  • That is an interesting study, but is a long way short of conclusive proof. There are many other variables that might have caused that difference in IQ. Schools, diet, other sources of flouride that occur naturally or from indoor burning of coal (I know the study reffered to coal pollution levels, but it did not specifically address the frequency of indoor coal burning- one of the biggest factors in flouride exposure in China).

    Show me another 5 independent studies, which better control the variables and you will certainly have my interest. But for now I think the weight of evidence indicates that flouridated drinking water (at a certain level- remember, flouride occurs in our drinking water naturally, we just top up the amount a litle) is good for teeth and has no statistically significant health risks.

    some say it's fine, other studies are finding something entirely different. I'll skip the bone cancer, and opt for the tooth brush scenario

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_fluoridation_controversy#Further_problems_assigned_to_water_fluoridation
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
Sign In or Register to comment.