More wisdom from Wright...

2»

Comments

  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    eekamouse wrote:

    Watch this... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOdlnzkeoyQ

    Watch the whole thing. The WHOLE thing.

    Really all one needs to watch is the fist 2/3'rds

    He's telling the truth....there's some really messed up murderous and genocidal verses as he says (and worse) in the bible upheld to this day.

    Murder, rape, genocide.... it's in the bible and laid out as almighty commands to be carried out as the will of almighty God..

    This is why the bible is, in reality, just a book made up by the politicians in the government (the church) of the day...

    Very little has changed over the years...

    The beat still goes on as twisted as ever...
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • DOSW
    DOSW Posts: 2,014
    Abookamongstthemany wrote:
    It must have been tough enough for Pastor Wright to grasp, seeing as how this whole issue is surrounded around the fact that he couldn't keep the two separated.

    What's your point? Just because Wright sometimes confuses the two doesn't mean Obama does, and THAT's the issue here.
    It's a town full of losers and I'm pulling out of here to win
  • Abookamongstthemany
    Abookamongstthemany Posts: 8,209
    DOSW wrote:
    What's your point? Just because Wright sometimes confuses the two doesn't mean Obama does, and THAT's the issue here.

    It doesn't mean Obama doesn't either. If Wright is bright enough to be Obama's mentor and he still gets the two confused....which a lot of people do, apparently (see abortion, gay marriage...which Obama's against, stem cell research, death penalty...I've even heard God invoked to rationalize pollution) then it's isn't a stretch to think that Obama's politics might gets mixed a bit, too....not that he's gonna let on but the possibility still exists.
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • eekamouse
    eekamouse Posts: 267
    God people. I don't want to vote for Obama. I would vote for Nader and/or Paul over him.

    However, Obama is right on at least one thing... the war. Always has been, sounds like he always will be.

    He might be lying. He might leave us in there. But there is no way our economy can get back on it's feet without pulling out of Iraq. Let alone our moral standing in the world.

    Hence, he gets my vote by default.
    Love is more important to me than faith.
  • El_Kabong
    El_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    eekamouse wrote:
    God people. I don't want to vote for Obama. I would vote for Nader and/or Paul over him.

    However, Obama is right on at least one thing... the war. Always has been, sounds like he always will be.

    He might be lying. He might leave us in there. But there is no way our economy can get back on it's feet without pulling out of Iraq. Let alone our moral standing in the world.

    Hence, he gets my vote by default.

    he said he will keep troops there to fight al qaeda...isn't that what they've been saying for years?

    and hasn't nader had it faaaaar more right about the war? and how can obama be so right when he changes his mind all the time? see my sig for one example, saying we need to stay until the insurgency is defeated and still keep a permanent presence to let 'iran and syria know we're serious'....??
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • unsung
    unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    eekamouse wrote:
    God people. I don't want to vote for Obama. I would vote for Nader and/or Paul over him.

    However, Obama is right on at least one thing... the war. Always has been, sounds like he always will be.

    He might be lying. He might leave us in there. But there is no way our economy can get back on it's feet without pulling out of Iraq. Let alone our moral standing in the world.

    Hence, he gets my vote by default.


    Ron Paul was the only Republican not to vote for the war. Even if he has no chance at winning stick to what you believe in, don't vote by default. IF Obama does win God forbid, you will be able to say you didn't vote for him after he screws things up worse.

    I like RP because he believes in personal freedom, the Constitution, and he isn't going to tax and spend blindly like Obama would. He also believes money should have something to back it up and not just have it running on a non-stop printing press. There is no value to the dollar when there are unlimited amounts going around.
  • eekamouse
    eekamouse Posts: 267
    unsung wrote:
    Ron Paul was the only Republican not to vote for the war. Even if he has no chance at winning stick to what you believe in, don't vote by default. IF Obama does win God forbid, you will be able to say you didn't vote for him after he screws things up worse.

    I like RP because he believes in personal freedom, the Constitution, and he isn't going to tax and spend blindly like Obama would. He also believes money should have something to back it up and not just have it running on a non-stop printing press. There is no value to the dollar when there are unlimited amounts going around.


    Yes. Yes. I hear all this, and will make my decision in November.

    HOWEVER, this shit with the pastor is utter crap.

    ALSO, once Obama gets us out of the war and unfucks the country, maybe (doubtful) someone like RP can get in and start budget slashing.
    Love is more important to me than faith.
  • Eliot Rosewater
    Eliot Rosewater Posts: 2,659
    unsung wrote:
    The guy hates whites and he hates America. Old news, time to move on.
    Are you illiterate? Or just a fucking moron?
  • Eliot Rosewater
    Eliot Rosewater Posts: 2,659
    unsung wrote:
    Ron Paul was the only Republican not to vote for the war.

    but why limit your choices to republicans? That's like going to a restaurant and only eating coleslaw. gross.
  • eekamouse
    eekamouse Posts: 267
    El_Kabong wrote:
    he said he will keep troops there to fight al qaeda...isn't that what they've been saying for years?

    and hasn't nader had it faaaaar more right about the war? and how can obama be so right when he changes his mind all the time? see my sig for one example, saying we need to stay until the insurgency is defeated and still keep a permanent presence to let 'iran and syria know we're serious'....??

    That's the beauty of it. If he does that shit... do you know how many people will be fucking pissed!

    It will expose the hypocrisy of both sides.

    And, then I'll buy a gun, and it will be anarchy in the streets with any luck.

    Fucking lazy Americans.

    Was that outloud?
    Love is more important to me than faith.
  • unsung
    unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    Eliot Rosewater wrote:
    but why limit your choices to republicans? That's like going to a restaurant and only eating coleslaw. gross.


    Because I think that Ron Paul would be the best choice for this country even if he wasn't the media darling and not a big business puppet. Economics is more important to me than voting for someone because it is cool.
    Eliot Rosewater wrote:
    Are you illiterate? Or just a fucking moron?

    Are you another one of these guys on this site that calls people names when you don't agree politically or do you just spout off because you are behind the keyboard? I thought the first way to lose an argument is when someone resorted to profanities and name-calling instead of offering an opinion that consisted of a valid thought.

Categories