Say No to Israeli Occupation!

Byrnzie

http://www.endtheoccupation.org/article.php?list=type&type=162

On the 40th anniversary of Israel's illegal military occupation of the Palestinian West Bank, Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem, join the US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation and United for Peace and Justice in Washington, DC, June 10-11, 2007 for a protest, teach-in, and lobby day.

Sign the petition...

http://www.democracyinaction.org/uscampaign/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=6345&t=


http://www.palestineremembered.com/images/DeadPalestinianAsAnIsraeliTrophies.jpg

http://www.worldproutassembly.org/images/gaza-martyr.jpg

http://www.palestineremembered.com/images/FarisOdeh%20.jpg

boxwine_in_hell

Why not give Texas, California, New Mexico and Arizona back to Mexico. That territory was illegally taken. I'm sure Jordan took it illegally before it was part of Israel as well. The law is made by the victors.

polaris

boxwine_in_hell wrote:

Why not give Texas, California, New Mexico and Arizona back to Mexico. That territory was illegally taken. I'm sure Jordan took it illegally before it was part of Israel as well. The law is made by the victors.

then why did we invade iraq after it "occupied" kuwait?

boxwine_in_hell

polaris wrote:

then why did we invade iraq after it "occupied" kuwait?

I'm sure you can figure that one out without my help. Go hop in your car and think about it.

TheVoiceInside

This guy is fucking nuts!!! I know him too.
http://nyc.indymedia.org/or/2007/04/85354.html

polaris

boxwine_in_hell wrote:

I'm sure you can figure that one out without my help. Go hop in your car and think about it.

any answer i can think of contradicts your initial response - so, i'm gonna need your help ... if you could be so kind

boxwine_in_hell

The point is that it's okay to take land in the 19th Century but not in the 20th? That's stupid. Taking is taking. Why don't we just declare all the countries in the world a "do-over" and just start from scratch? Let's start with giving the Dakotas and Nebraska back to the Sioux nation, since it was "illegally" taken. Damn come to think of it, all of us American invaders and occupiers need to give our country back to the original inhabitants.

MrBrian

boxwine_in_hell wrote:

The point is that it's okay to take land in the 19th Century but not in the 20th? That's stupid. Taking is taking. Why don't we just declare all the countries in the world a "do-over" and just start from scratch? Let's start with giving the Dakotas and Nebraska back to the Sioux nation, since it was "illegally" taken. Damn come to think of it, all of us American invaders and occupiers need to give our country back to the original inhabitants.

we killed most of the original inhanbitants. israel has yet to do that, so the war is still going on. the blood is still shedding.

Israel has yet to win. not only that, they continue to grab land. so your exmaple does'nt quite fit this issue.

Byrnzie

boxwine_in_hell wrote:

The point is that it's okay to take land in the 19th Century but not in the 20th? That's stupid. Taking is taking. Why don't we just declare all the countries in the world a "do-over" and just start from scratch? Let's start with giving the Dakotas and Nebraska back to the Sioux nation, since it was "illegally" taken. Damn come to think of it, all of us American invaders and occupiers need to give our country back to the original inhabitants.

Or maybe just start according the original inhabitants the same rights and privileges as everyone else, and cease stealing more and more of their land? You could also begin releasing all the native American Political prisoners who are currently being held in your jails.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

polaris wrote:

then why did we invade iraq after it "occupied" kuwait?

because politicians, by and large, are foocking twats!

Byrnzie

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

because politicians, by and large, are foocking twats!

Where were ya when I needed ya? I've spent the past year on here trying to arrive at this one basic conclusion.

OutOfBreath

No. I said it now.

Peace
Dan

Derrick

boxwine_in_hell wrote:

I'm sure you can figure that one out without my help. Go hop in your car and think about it.

lol...well said. well said.

Byrnzie

Derrick wrote:

lol...well said. well said.

It wasn't well said at all. He didn't explain himself, and nobody but him is any the wiser. Or is it that you are both from some kind of hick town where everyone speaks in some kind of cryptic gibberish intelligible only to those with enough toxic cow dung up their nostrils?

TofuDownUnder

boxwine_in_hell, there really isn't an absolute answer to your argument. It's all situational, I mean, you wouldn't want to put all of Russia, Central Asia, Korea, and China under Mongolia's rule because Genghis Khan once ruled that land 800 years ago, huh?

But at the same time, in a situation like Palestine, the Israelis have clearly illegally invaded the land and expelled much of its population (if not killed off), and is occupying even more land.

I guess, at the end, nobody has a religious right to control the land, but since for the last 1500 Muslims have been the very predominant majority in Palestine, it is they who are in the right.

sicnevol

why? seriously, WTF