The U.S & Terrorism

ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
edited April 2008 in A Moving Train
Just watched a Noam Chomsky speech - Distorted Morality - http://www.torrentz.com/80741d6bd91bbf9842f2950ffe8a70d554ef552f - in which he mentions the fact that the U.S and Israel both voted against a U.N resolution condemning international terrorism in 1987. The U.S then used it's veto and blocked the resolution. The reasons given for their negative votes were that the following paragraphs were unacceptable to them...

http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/42/a42r159.htm
General Assembly
94th plenary meeting - 7 December 1987

8. Also urges all States, unilaterally and in co-operation with other
States, as well as relevant United Nations organs, to contribute to the
progressive elimination of the causes underlying international terrorism and
to pay special attention to all situations, including colonialism, racism and
situations involving mass and flagrant violations of human rights and
fundamental freedoms and those involving alien domination and occupation, that may give rise to international terrorism and may endanger international peace and security;


14. Considers that nothing in the present resolution could in any way
prejudice the right to self-determination, freedom and independence, as
derived from the Charter of the United Nations, of peoples forcibly deprived
of that right referred to in the Declaration on Principles of International
Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, particularly peoples under colonial and racist regimes and foreign occupation or other forms of colonial
domination, nor, in accordance with the principles of the Charter and in conformity with the above-mentioned Declaration, the right of these peoples to struggle to this end and to seek and receive support;


At the time of this resolution the ANC was regarded by the U.S as a terrorist organization - hence, the following phrase was seen by the U.S as problematic..

'..peoples under colonial and racist regimes..'

..and hence why the following U.N resolutions were all vetoed by the U.S..

1979 Calls for an end to all military and nuclear collaboration with the apartheid South Africa.
1979 Strengthens the arms embargo against South Africa.
1979 Offers assistance to all the oppressed people of South Africa and their liberation movement
1981 Condemns South Africa for attacks on neighbouring states, condemns apartheid and attempts to strengthen sanctions. 7 resolutions.
1981 Condemns an attempted coup by South Africa on the Seychelles.
1983 Resolutions about apartheid, nuclear arms, economics, and international law. 15 resolutions.
1984 Condemns support of South Africa in its Namibian and other policies.
1984 International action to eliminate apartheid.
1984 Resolutions about apartheid, nuclear arms, economics, and international law. 18 resolutions.
1986 Calls on all governments (including the USA) to observe international law.
1986 Imposes economic and military sanctions against South Africa.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article2000.htm

Also, the phrase '..and foreign occupation or other forms of colonial
domination..' was understood by everybody to refer to the Israeli occupation of the West bank and Gaza. And so the resolution condemning terrorism was vetoed by the U.S because it would have interfered with U.S terrorist activities in Latin America and it's unconditional military, economic, and diplomatic support for Israeli terrorism in the West Bank and Gaza.

The resolution:
153 - 2, with one abstention (Honduras)
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • NevermindNevermind Posts: 1,006
    Our government are the terrorists. Hello Pentagon.
  • the only terrorists i see are the ones ousting other countries' leaders and occupying their country to terrorize the civilians.

    yeah, us, the united states.
    You can't spell "dumb" without DMB
  • GauchoBGauchoB Posts: 224
    Byrnzie wrote:
    Just watched a Noam Chomsky speech - Distorted Morality - http://www.torrentz.com/80741d6bd91bbf9842f2950ffe8a70d554ef552f - in which he mentions the fact that the U.S and Israel both voted against a U.N resolution condemning international terrorism in 1987. The U.S then used it's veto and blocked the resolution. The reasons given for their negative votes were that the following paragraphs were unacceptable to them...

    http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/42/a42r159.htm
    General Assembly
    94th plenary meeting - 7 December 1987

    8. Also urges all States, unilaterally and in co-operation with other
    States, as well as relevant United Nations organs, to contribute to the
    progressive elimination of the causes underlying international terrorism and
    to pay special attention to all situations, including colonialism, racism and
    situations involving mass and flagrant violations of human rights and
    fundamental freedoms and those involving alien domination and occupation, that may give rise to international terrorism and may endanger international peace and security;


    14. Considers that nothing in the present resolution could in any way
    prejudice the right to self-determination, freedom and independence, as
    derived from the Charter of the United Nations, of peoples forcibly deprived
    of that right referred to in the Declaration on Principles of International
    Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, particularly peoples under colonial and racist regimes and foreign occupation or other forms of colonial
    domination, nor, in accordance with the principles of the Charter and in conformity with the above-mentioned Declaration, the right of these peoples to struggle to this end and to seek and receive support;


    At the time of this resolution the ANC was regarded by the U.S as a terrorist organization - hence, the following phrase was seen by the U.S as problematic..

    '..peoples under colonial and racist regimes..'

    ..and hence why the following U.N resolutions were all vetoed by the U.S..

    1979 Calls for an end to all military and nuclear collaboration with the apartheid South Africa.
    1979 Strengthens the arms embargo against South Africa.
    1979 Offers assistance to all the oppressed people of South Africa and their liberation movement
    1981 Condemns South Africa for attacks on neighbouring states, condemns apartheid and attempts to strengthen sanctions. 7 resolutions.
    1981 Condemns an attempted coup by South Africa on the Seychelles.
    1983 Resolutions about apartheid, nuclear arms, economics, and international law. 15 resolutions.
    1984 Condemns support of South Africa in its Namibian and other policies.
    1984 International action to eliminate apartheid.
    1984 Resolutions about apartheid, nuclear arms, economics, and international law. 18 resolutions.
    1986 Calls on all governments (including the USA) to observe international law.
    1986 Imposes economic and military sanctions against South Africa.
    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article2000.htm

    Also, the phrase '..and foreign occupation or other forms of colonial
    domination..' was understood by everybody to refer to the Israeli occupation of the West bank and Gaza. And so the resolution condemning terrorism was vetoed by the U.S because it would have interfered with U.S terrorist activities in Latin America and it's unconditional military, economic, and diplomatic support for Israeli terrorism in the West Bank and Gaza.

    The resolution:
    153 - 2, with one abstention (Honduras)

    Doesn't this make your 20th thread on the last 8 months with the word Israel in it? They do have treatment for OCD in China no?
  • NevermindNevermind Posts: 1,006
    GauchoB wrote:
    Doesn't this make your 20th thread on the last 8 months with the word Israel in it? They do have treatment for OCD in China no?
    Go away jlew.
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    US terrorist activities in Central/South America during the Cold War killed more innocent civilians than Al Qaida could dream of killing.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    This is our wierd... symbionic relationship courtesy of the Bush Administration. We need them around to justify all those jobs in the heavily bloated Homeland Security monster. That is the future of the Military/Industrial complex as we ween aray from heavy manfacturing.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
Sign In or Register to comment.