9-11 Debunkers P.M. are credible?

2»

Comments

  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    bootlegger10 wrote:
    Your job to prove it wasn't. Anyway, we got the planes flying into buildings on our side. You've got pipe dream theories that are based out of an intense hatred for America. It is funny, every time I start leaning left, freaks like the Loose Change folks bring me back to reality.

    There aren't just theories surrounding 9/11, there are also facts. You are obviously afraid to confront these facts and so take the easy, age-old cop-out, of accusing people of 'hating America'.
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    Hard questions come up...their heads shut off, and all they think is sasquatch and UFO's...It's a uniquely American experience.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    Hard questions come up...their heads shut off, and all they think is sasquatch and UFO's...It's a uniquely American experience.

    If they began to question the world that Fox news presents to them, and happened to discover some cracks in this edifice, then the entire building could come crashing down around them. This is a very scary prospect for some people. Obtaining a critical faculty is like eating Pringles: Once you pop, you can't stop!
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    Byrnzie wrote:
    If they began to question the world that Fox news presents to them, and happened to discover some cracks in this edifice, then the entire building could come crashing down around them. This is a very scary prospect for some people. Obtaining a critical faculty is like eating Pringles: Once you pop, you can't stop!

    stuck inside the box while being made to think they are outside of it....or nothing exists or matters outside of it.

    as per wikipedia:

    "In the United States, Fox News Channel is rated as the cable news network with the largest number of regular viewers"

    yeap...
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • Ahnimus
    Ahnimus Posts: 10,560
    I personally read the P.M. article on it and I found it to be no more than a straw man tactic. They picked at the least credible theories of 9/11 and ignored the fairly decent theories.

    I enjoy an opposing view, but I have no respect for straw man tactics.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    It's not possible to debate with anyone that watches mainstream American news channels... they don't have a two clues to rub together to form a valid unbiased opinion.

    Kinda like when you're a in a room full of stink, after a while you just can't smell it anymore.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • g under p
    g under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,237

    Some people, who suppose themselves to be both "intelligent" and "rational", dismiss any denial of the official story of September 11th as "conspiracy theory". This not only reveals an absence of (or at least a curious suspension of) thinking ability but also fails to address the fundamental question: Who planned and carried out the attacks of 9/11? Articles on this website and on many others present convincing evidence (to those whose minds are not closed) that what happened on 9/11 (a crime which has never been subjected to a criminal investigation) could not have happened as the Bush administration claims it did. If so then why should we believe the claim that the operation was planned and carried out by a cabal consisting of a couple of dozen Arabs? Given all the holes in the official story, there is no reason to believe this claim. And if Arabs did not plan and carry out the attacks of 9/11, then who did? This is the question that those who accept the official story are desperately trying to avoid facing, because to do so threatens their entire set of beliefs about the current nature of American society and the U.S. government. Faith in the official story is ultimately based on one thing: Fear of the consequences, should it be proven false.

    This article, by way of rebuttal of the deceptive straw-man tactics of Popular Mechanics, examines the evidence for and against the official story (which is itself a conspiracy theory) of the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, and concludes that there is no evidence to support the official story, and that it cannot be true. This was also the conclusion reached in the author's earlier article on this subject, The World Trade Center Demolition and the So-Called War on Terrorism. Read, think about it, and decide for yourself. Don't allow yourself to be deceived by the complicity of the mainstream media in the cover-up and by the trolls in the online forums and on Wikipedia (all references to this article in Wikipedia articles are quickly deleted).

    Has anyone read this there's more, check it out and do tell what ya think. It's called Reply To Popular Mechinics re: 9/II.

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    g under p wrote:
    Has anyone read this there's more, check it out and do tell what ya think. It's called Reply To Popular Mechinics re: 9/II.

    Peace

    reading it now...interesting.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • g under p
    g under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,237
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    reading it now...interesting.

    After a good night's rest many things appear to be clearer, so what did ya think about this?

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


Categories