Home› A Moving Train

Fox News On Global Warming

JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
edited January 2007 in A Moving Train
Posted: 06 Jan 2007 09:03 AM CST
It's media spin because it just happens to be hotter on the coasts where the liberal media is based.

This is hysterical.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=LDEOIWzeK7o

By the way, being from the NE, the guy who says that the past three years were records for cold here, is absolutely wrong. Last winter was a rather warm one too.
Post edited by Unknown User on
«13

Comments

  • miller8966miller8966 Posts: 1,450
    i dont believe in global warming.
    America...the greatest Country in the world.
  • JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    miller8966 wrote:
    i dont believe in global warming.
    AND you watch FOX news. Imagine that.
  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761
    miller8966 wrote:
    i dont believe in global warming.

    Of course you don't. You my friend aren't interested in facts and numbers, those are just liberal propeganda
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • keeponrockinkeeponrockin Posts: 7,446
    chiefojibwa wrote:
    exactly. reality has a well-known liberal bias.

    Duh, you didn't know?
    Believe me, when I was growin up, I thought the worst thing you could turn out to be was normal, So I say freaks in the most complementary way. Here's a song by a fellow freak - E.V
  • miller8966miller8966 Posts: 1,450
    I think this winter has been great. Personally i love the fact that its warmer...im actually contemplating spraying some aerosol cans off into the air.

    Ya know speed up the process.
    America...the greatest Country in the world.
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    so its republicans fault for global warming? earth has been around alot longer then humans. there is not way to stop the world from warming up. one day all humans will be gone and the earth will carry on. why is this such an issue? its laughable how everyone finds time to blame the big bad FOX news for distorting the so called facts
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    chiefojibwa wrote:
    well, as long as you're happy, fuck the rest of the world!
    im pretty happy too.
  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761
    jlew24asu wrote:
    im pretty happy too.

    Just keep voting for administrations that let the oil and energy companies compose their own regulations and you will be really happy.
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    ledvedderman wrote:
    Just keep voting for administrations that let the oil and energy companies compose their own regulations and you will be really happy.
    I want nothing to do with Oil and our dependence from oil. find me a candidate who wants to end us with that dependence and he has my vote.
  • Thorns2010Thorns2010 Posts: 2,201
    miller8966 wrote:
    I think this winter has been great. Personally i love the fact that its warmer...im actually contemplating spraying some aerosol cans off into the air.

    Ya know speed up the process.

    To bad aerosol cans in the US haven't contained CFC's since the 70's :D
  • CorporateWhoreCorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    jlew24asu wrote:
    im pretty happy too.

    I too am happy.

    Haha, these liberals crack me up. "You know, liberalism always tends to have a monopoly on the truth HEE HEE!"

    Clowns.

    Liberalism is the ideology of national suicide.
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • CorporateWhoreCorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=3a9bc8a4-802a-23ad-4065-7dc37ec39adf

    Global warming is bullshit.
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • CorporateWhoreCorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    icarus wrote:
    people who dont believe global warming...

    explain to me why we're not in an ice age anymore.
    Better yet, have the cavemen explain why they weren't in an ice age anymore!
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • sourdoughsourdough Posts: 579
    I don't think ANYONE is denying that climatic shifts have occured before. The difference between previous changes and what is happening now, is that there was not any one species with the ability and record of altering the environment AND the atmosphere.
  • CorporateWhoreCorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    sourdough wrote:
    that there was not any one species with the ability and record of altering the environment AND the atmosphere.

    And there still isn't.
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    CorporateWhore wrote:
    And there still isn't.
    Considering you cannot prove a negative, is this merely your personal opinon, then?
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • NOCODE#1NOCODE#1 Posts: 1,477
    miller8966 wrote:
    i dont believe in global warming.
    its alright we have your flinstones chewables ready
    Let's not be negative now. Thumper has spoken
  • CorporateWhoreCorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    Anyone who believes that global warming is undeniable fact is living in Looney Tunes land.

    Get a brain and study the facts. Research it yourself, and then maybe you will be as informed as we skeptics.
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    CorporateWhore wrote:
    Anyone who believes that global warming is undeniable fact is living in Looney Tunes land.

    Get a brain and study the facts. Research it yourself, and then maybe you will be as informed as we skeptics.
    So, character judgments aside, based on your interpretation of the research, this is your opinion considering you can't prove a negative?
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • CorporateWhoreCorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    angelica wrote:
    So, character judgments aside, based on your interpretation of the research, this is your opinion considering you can't prove a negative?

    my opinion is this guy's opinion:

    http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008597
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    CorporateWhore wrote:
    my opinion is this guy's opinion:

    http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008597
    I'm not talking about that guy--I'm talking about you specifically. Are you taking "that guy's" opinion as your own, then? You've levelled a strong judgment re: Looney tunes, I'd think you would be willing to stand behind it. Considering you cannot prove your opinion, then I'm going to have to assume you are willing to make judgments based on your interpretation of the facts--on your opinion.
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • CorporateWhoreCorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    angelica wrote:
    I'm not talking about that guy--I'm talking about you specifically. Are you taking "that guy's" opinion as your own, then? You've levelled a strong judgment re: Looney tunes, I'd think you would be willing to stand behind it. Considering you cannot prove your opinion, then I'm going to have to assume you are willing to make judgments based on your interpretation of the facts--on your opinion.

    That guy is an atmospheric researcher from MIT. He is also a skeptic of global warming. I agree with him. Prove him wrong?
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    CorporateWhore wrote:
    That guy is an atmospheric researcher from MIT. He is also a skeptic of global warming. I agree with him. Prove him wrong?
    I'm challenging your line of thinking because I see gaps. As I say, I'm not concerned with "that guy".
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • miller8966miller8966 Posts: 1,450
    angelica wrote:
    I'm challenging your line of thinking because I see gaps. As I say, I'm not concerned with "that guy".

    SO what if theirs "gaps" in his thinking..everyone has gaps in their theories.
    America...the greatest Country in the world.
  • CorporateWhoreCorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    angelica wrote:
    I'm challenging your line of thinking because I see gaps. As I say, I'm not concerned with "that guy".
    My guess is that he knows more about global climate than you do.
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    CorporateWhore wrote:
    My guess is that he knows more about global climate than you do.
    There are many experts who disagree. You are the one throwing around statements about "looney tunes". I wonder why you make statements and then are seemingly dodging them by attempting to direct attention back on me, or on the guy in the article. It gives me the impression you are not comfortable answering questions about what seem to be strong opinions you hold on the subject. If your opinions were as solid as you try to make them out to be, I think you would be quite willing to stand behind them and not use smoke and mirrors. In the end, your opinion is your interpretation as is mine or anyones. And really, calling people, or points of view "looney tunes" isn't anything close to being scientific, or based on fact.
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    miller8966 wrote:
    SO what if theirs "gaps" in his thinking..everyone has gaps in their theories.
    This is a message board, where people debate topics. It's fine that we all have gaps in our theories, and hopefully we're able to stand up to questioning and face such gaps and either become strong in our views, or realise we might not be as realistic as we might tell ourselves we are. This way we all learn.
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • NOCODE#1NOCODE#1 Posts: 1,477
    CorporateWhore wrote:
    That guy is an atmospheric researcher from MIT.
    AND?


    why have 90% of the north east record highs (during winter) all been reached in the last 37 years


    next
    Let's not be negative now. Thumper has spoken
  • NOCODE#1NOCODE#1 Posts: 1,477
    CorporateWhore wrote:
    My "guess" is that he knows more about global climate than you do.


    "Guess" is the key word
    Let's not be negative now. Thumper has spoken
  • CorporateWhoreCorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    NOCODE#1 wrote:
    "Guess" is the key word

    Um.

    He knows more about global climate than you.
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
Sign In or Register to comment.