Toward an International Arms Trade Treaty

Puck78Puck78 Posts: 737
edited October 2006 in A Moving Train
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL

26 October 2006

Overwhelming majority of world’s governments vote to start work on an International Arms Trade Treaty

Control Arms Campaign:Amnesty International, International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) and Oxfam International.

Today at the United Nations, the majority of the world’s governments took the first step towards a global Arms Trade Treaty to prevent international arms transfers that fuel conflict, poverty and serious human rights violations. The vote comes three years after the launch of a campaign which has seen over a million people in 170 countries calling for a Treaty.

The vote in the UN General Assembly’s First Committee is the first time that governments have voted on the proposal to develop an Arms Trade Treaty, and support was overwhelming: 139 voted yes, with only the United States voting against. Support was particularly strong in Africa, Latin America and Europe.

Work on the Treaty will begin in early 2007 when the new UN Secretary General, Ban Ki-moon, will begin to canvass the views of all member states to establish the foundations of the Treaty.

Going into the vote, the resolution was co-sponsored by 116 governments; a huge number for such a bold initiative.15 Nobel Peace Prize Laureates supported the call for an Arms Trade Treaty this week in a statement issued by the Arias Foundation and the Control Arms Campaign.

"This massive vote to develop a global Arms Trade Treaty is an historic opportunity for governments to tackle the scourge of irresponsible and immoral arms transfers. Any credible Treaty must outlaw those transfers, which fuel the systematic murder, rape, torture and expulsion of thousands of people," said Kate Gilmore, Amnesty International’s Executive Deputy Secretary General.

"Today, the world’s governments have voted to end the scandal of the unregulated arms trade. Since the Control Arms campaign began three years ago, an estimated one million people have been killed by conventional weapons. In response, over a million campaigners from over 170 countries have called for an Arms Trade Treaty. Today governments answered that call," said Jeremy Hobbs, Director of Oxfam International.

"We have come a long, long way since three years ago when we launched the Control Arms campaign: in those days the prospect of an Arms Trade Treaty being negotiated in the UN was viewed as idealistic at best. But today we are in the majority. Now this victory must be converted into a strong and effective Arms Trade Treaty based on States’ commitments under international law," said Rebecca Peters, Director of IANSA.

Notes to Editors

The Process
The resolution requests the Secretary General to seek the views of all UN Member States on the feasibility, scope and draft parameters on a comprehensive legally binding instrument establishing common international standards for the export, import and transfer of conventional arms, and to submit a report to the General Assembly in late 2007. This will be followed by the establishment by the Secretary General in 2008 of a group of governmental experts from around the world which will examine the issue in detail and report back to the UN General Assembly.

About the campaign
The idea for the establishment of globally binding rules on arms transfers began in 1995 with a few Nobel Peace Laureates including Amnesty International and Dr Oscar Arias. The Control Arms Campaign was launched by AI, Oxfam International and the IANSA in 2003 and so far enjoys the support of over a million campaigners worldwide.

http://www.controlarms.org
www.amnesty.org
www.amnesty.org.uk
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    no way, the united states voted against developing an arms trade treaty? i am shocked beyond belief......nah who am i kidding? seems par for the course really.
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • I wish we could simply destroy all weapons, and stop manufacturing them.

    Gov should give up all armies as fighting forces.

    Once no one has the means to do war, they'll have to talk to each others.

    Okay, that SHOULD be this way. It'll never happens.

    A treaty is a start, but it won't go anywhere, cause the US gov won't sign it ;)
    Reality isn't what it used to be.
Sign In or Register to comment.