E-harmony.

1235»

Comments

  • lalalalaaaaaaaa
    lalalalaaaaaaaa Posts: 2,445
    Collin wrote:
    I don't get it. You said they needed to meet two criteria:

    1. They're discriminating with a legit reason (research was lacking/alternative website)

    2. They're not misrepresenting themselves
    (they still are)

    I guess the criteria don't matter that much after all, but it's rather about alternatives, which already existed, abundantly.

    Now that they're going to offer their services to gays on a linked site, they're meeting the criteria. Now E-Harmony (the COMPANY, not just http://www.eharmony.com) can call themselves a "relationship services provider" because they're not discriminating, and it's not a misrepresentation.
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    Saturnal wrote:
    Now that they're going to offer their services to gays on a linked site, they're meeting the criteria. Now E-Harmony (the COMPANY, not just http://www.eharmony.com) can call themselves a "relationship services provider" because they're not discriminating, and it's not a misrepresentation.


    cough *bullshit* cough :D
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")

Categories