Proctor & Gamble
sj.brodie
Posts: 468
Do me a favour. Look at this list and consider how many items by PG are in your house right now;
http://www.pg.com/common/product_sitemap.jhtml
How did this company come to be so successful? Reading a 'Herbal Essences' bottle is like spraying black paint over your eyes.
Why do P&G logos depict images of nature, flowers etc behind the logo? They do not represent nature, they represent greed. Nothing more.
How do these fuckers get away with marketing their products as being attractive and sexy? You've seen the commercial with a woman climaxing in the shower? Now we need to be educated about all the stages that were necessary to get that bottle of herbal essences orgasm shampoo in your hand. I can think of nothing more repulsive, spiritless and sexually uninteresting than their actions which are described here in detail;
http://www.uncaged.co.uk/pgnano.htm
Proctor & Gamble admit that they continue to test on animals
Now consider their fake image & marketing techniques again.
They should replace that image of nature with one of a dead mouse, gutted and bleeding from it's lungs with a needle shoved through it's thorax.
But it's good for the economy i guess...
http://www.pg.com/common/product_sitemap.jhtml
How did this company come to be so successful? Reading a 'Herbal Essences' bottle is like spraying black paint over your eyes.
Why do P&G logos depict images of nature, flowers etc behind the logo? They do not represent nature, they represent greed. Nothing more.
How do these fuckers get away with marketing their products as being attractive and sexy? You've seen the commercial with a woman climaxing in the shower? Now we need to be educated about all the stages that were necessary to get that bottle of herbal essences orgasm shampoo in your hand. I can think of nothing more repulsive, spiritless and sexually uninteresting than their actions which are described here in detail;
http://www.uncaged.co.uk/pgnano.htm
Proctor & Gamble admit that they continue to test on animals
Now consider their fake image & marketing techniques again.
They should replace that image of nature with one of a dead mouse, gutted and bleeding from it's lungs with a needle shoved through it's thorax.
But it's good for the economy i guess...
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
(Reason #1 of many not to support the SPP/NAU agreement for North America).
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Let's test on humans, instead!!!
(It's more fun to watch them suffer, isn't it?)
—Dorothy Parker
http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
Don't fuck with P&G.
While testing on animals may not be pleasant, what is the alternative? And before you say "Just don't use those products," remember there are a lot more things than makeup or shampoo that get tested on animals (including medicines, etc).
I need it more fruity smelling...
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
I DON'T think the argument is legitimate when we're talking about shampoo. The world has plenty of shampoos, deodorants, mascaras and laundry detergents. There is no way that I can see to argue that the development of another one is worth the pain, suffering, and death of innocent creatures. There are plenty of companies that manage to make these products without testing on animals, so it's obviously quite possible to do so.