social scurity benefits

deadnotedeadnote Posts: 1,678
edited October 2007 in A Moving Train
when is the government gonna budge and up the benefits for deserving qualifliers
set your laughter free

dreamer in my dream

we got the guns

i love you,but im..............callin out.........callin out
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • LizardLizard So Cal Posts: 12,091
    I dunno---maybe when people that didn’t put a dime into it stop getting money?
    So I'll just lie down and wait for the dream
    Where I'm not ugly and you're lookin' at me
  • when do i get my Porsche 911?
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    deadnote wrote:
    when is the government gonna budge and up the benefits for deserving qualifliers

    A better question is when is congress going to admit that it's broken and scrap it altogether.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • onelongsongonelongsong Posts: 3,517
    deadnote wrote:
    when is the government gonna budge and up the benefits for deserving qualifliers

    when they stop paying those who are defrauding them.
    i found out the receptionist at my doctors office was receiving social security disability benefits and working under her husbands social security number. i've reported her every month for 4 months yet as of yesterday; she's still working there.
  • even flow?even flow? Posts: 8,066
    when they stop paying those who are defrauding them.
    i found out the receptionist at my doctors office was receiving social security disability benefits and working under her husbands social security number. i've reported her every month for 4 months yet as of yesterday; she's still working there.


    Maybe you should change her last name to Lopez or Sanchez and they may act a tad quicker.

    Don't you have to work down there to actually get money when you retire?
    You've changed your place in this world!
  • When will Congress stop taking money from the surplus, and instead leave it there (collecting interest) to pay benefits for people down the road?
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • onelongsongonelongsong Posts: 3,517
    even flow? wrote:
    Maybe you should change her last name to Lopez or Sanchez and they may act a tad quicker.

    Don't you have to work down there to actually get money when you retire?

    i was gainfully employed for 33 years before becoming disabled. then i started a business i could work from home (ranching). all i do is watch the buffalo eat and process orders. since they put me on morphine and phenobarbitol i get ssdi. i have surgery in a forthnight so we'll see what happens.
  • hippiemomhippiemom Posts: 3,326
    know1 wrote:
    A better question is when is congress going to admit that it's broken and scrap it altogether.
    No time soon, I hope. It's my only income now.
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
  • spiral outspiral out Posts: 1,052
    know1 wrote:
    A better question is when is congress going to admit that it's broken and scrap it altogether.

    What would happen to all the people who rely on it?
    Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!

    The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
  • wolfbearwolfbear Posts: 3,965
    I can't see the program going away, too many people depend on it, although it was never designed for that. It's a catastrophe that's for sure and one that is coming to a head shortly. It's been drained for other issues for sure and if invested properly the money would be there, but who knows what the outcome will be? :)
    "I'd rather be with an animal." "Those that can be trusted can change their mind." "The in between is mine." "If I don't lose control, explore and not explode, a preternatural other plane with the power to maintain." "Yeh this is living." "Life is what you make it."
  • AnonAnon Posts: 11,175
    When will Congress stop taking money from the surplus, and instead leave it there (collecting interest) to pay benefits for people down the road?

    good question. deadnotes post talked about 'deserving qualifiers'. it's disgusting to think that people like hippiemom and other deserving recipients may one day, not have this kind of support.

    where's the money going? $507 billion spent for the global war on terror to date, might have something to do with that.
  • 810wmb810wmb Posts: 849
    bush proposed to fix it, everyone (dems) said "there's nothing wrong with it"
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • A better question would be:
    When are they going to STOP TAXING it?

    WHEN RON PAUL GETS ELECTED!

    :D
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • 810wmb wrote:
    bush proposed to fix it, everyone (dems) said "there's nothing wrong with it"

    If Congress wouldn't have skimmed off the surplus for the past decades, we'd have plenty of money in there for the system to last for the loooonnnnggggg foreseeable future.
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • 810wmb810wmb Posts: 849
    If Congress wouldn't have skimmed off the surplus for the past decades, we'd have plenty of money in there for the system to last for the loooonnnnggggg foreseeable future.


    that's true, but when it came time to address the problem, the dems said it was fine....
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • 810wmb wrote:
    that's true, but when it came time to address the problem, the dems said it was fine....

    You mean when there was a Republican majority in the house and senate?

    Politicians on neither side wanted it, it isn't the best campaigning move to piss off the old people.

    Blaming the dems for something that both parties do is my biggest pet peeve of conservative talk radio.
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    Lizard wrote:
    I dunno---maybe when people that didn’t put a dime into it stop getting money?


    this is wrong... and scrapping it is wrong too... i know it has become popular propaganda with some, especially from the right. but thats because they have their facts wrong

    the real issue is the fact that ZERO income over $97,500 gets taxed for social security... thats right folks... you only pay that 6.2 % tax on the first 100k of your income... so that means bill gates is only paying into social security on his first 100k, which means he is apying just about the same as us per year, yet he is worth $50 billion dollars.

    so open all income to the 6.2 % tax and we could do a whole hell of a lot with it. but oh no, the ceo making $20,000,000 this year cant afford to pay that 6% :rolleyes:

    if you take advantage of this country and its economic system and opportunites then you should help give back to the country...

    there is no reason why bill gates only paid about $3,000 more than me in social security taxes last year... that is just bullshit
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    hippiemom wrote:
    No time soon, I hope. It's my only income now.


    see... this is what i am talking about... thank you for sharing and bringing the issue back to reality

    to my friends on the right... life is real... people are real...

    stop being so fucking greedy, and gladly help your fellow human
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    my2hands wrote:

    there is no reason why bill gates only paid about $3,000 more than me in social security taxes last year... that is just bullshit

    why are you so focused on income tax. our tax system is much more complex. and come april 15th, rich people pay MUCH more then you.

    and no its not bullshit. does bill gates use more government resources then you are I?
  • decides2dreamdecides2dream Posts: 14,977
    Lizard wrote:
    I dunno---maybe when people that didn’t put a dime into it stop getting money?



    :)
    agreed.


    also, i think the government has to stop "borrowing" $$$ from social security as well. we all are PAYING in...so leave it be, pay out benefits to those who paid in, and leave the rest ALONE! personally, i stil believe social security is a good idea, smart to have supplemental retirement income.....and glad it is there for those deserving aAND truly needing.

    my2hands wrote:
    there is no reason why bill gates only paid about $3,000 more than me in social security taxes last year... that is just bullshit



    why?
    it's not like he'll get MORE out of it, so i see no need for him to pay out even more. social security is designed to be supplemental income, as in....ADDITION to your own pension plan, savings, etc. it's also a great safeguard for those who need disability, dependent spouses/children for a worker who dies, etc. i see no need for ANYone to pay more than their 'fair share'....and i believe people like bill gates, sure ridiculously wealthy...but it sure seems that he give and gives and gives...so why should he be FORCED to give anymore? he pays in like the rest of us.
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • LizardLizard So Cal Posts: 12,091
    my2hands wrote:
    this is wrong... and scrapping it is wrong too... i know it has become popular propaganda with some, especially from the right. but thats because they have their facts wrong

    the real issue is the fact that ZERO income over $97,500 gets taxed for social security... thats right folks... you only pay that 6.2 % tax on the first 100k of your income... so that means bill gates is only paying into social security on his first 100k, which means he is apying just about the same as us per year, yet he is worth $50 billion dollars.

    so open all income to the 6.2 % tax and we could do a whole hell of a lot with it. but oh no, the ceo making $20,000,000 this year cant afford to pay that 6% :rolleyes:

    if you take advantage of this country and its economic system and opportunites then you should help give back to the country...

    there is no reason why bill gates only paid about $3,000 more than me in social security taxes last year... that is just bullshit

    1) There are social programs to help people—that are tax funded. I don’t think it is asking too much that programs that take out money from your paycheck, supposedly for your future, are at least used by people that paid into it.

    2) Gates donates tons of money so I have no problem with him.
    So I'll just lie down and wait for the dream
    Where I'm not ugly and you're lookin' at me
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    :)
    why?
    it's not like he'll get MORE out of it, so i see no need for him to pay out even more. social security is designed to be supplemental income, as in....ADDITION to your own pension plan, savings, etc. it's also a great safeguard for those who need disability, dependent spouses/children for a worker who dies, etc. i see no need for ANYone to pay more than their 'fair share'....and i believe people like bill gates, sure ridiculously wealthy...but it sure seems that he give and gives and gives...so why should he be FORCED to give anymore?
    what the fuck happened to the people of this country?... i guess no one believes in helping their fellow man anymore. "he is rich, so why should he care or help pay his share, since he wont need it"... i am sossry, but i think that is a terrible way to look at this issue. when my father was struck with cancer, that became his only income to survive off of, it is needed, and it is real. i see nothing wrong with a man worth $50 billion paying 6% of his entire income to help the disabled and retiree's that worked their entire life to help make this country "great"... if he can take advantage of this country and its economic system to the tune of $50,000,000,000 then he sure as hell can pay 6% on his entire income just like I do. to think otherwise is just insane, and greedy. IMO


    he pays in like the rest of us.
    no he doesnt... that is my entire point... he pays .000000001 % of his income into fica, while me and you pay the full 6.2 %


    individual greed in this country is absolutely out of control... people thinking the extremely wealthy should not help pay their fair share for social programs and safety nets because they wont have to use them? wow, just flat out wow! what a joke
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    Lizard wrote:

    2) Gates donates tons of money so I have no problem with him.

    it is much more than bill gates... it is ALL income over $97,500 that doesnt get ANY fica tax that is the problem. think about that for a second. the CEO of Exxon pays just about the same total amount into social security as you and I. even though he makes in one week more than you or i will make in our lifetimes... and % wise it isnt even close... he is paying a fraction of 1% of his total income, and we are paying the full 6.2%

    that is just insane to me...and even crazier to me that people defend it?
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    Lizard wrote:
    1) There are social programs to help people—that are tax funded. I don’t think it is asking too much that programs that take out money from your paycheck, supposedly for your future, are at least used by people that paid into it.


    the whole fraud thing is exactly that, a fraud. people act like it is rampant and out of control. not even close. just like the "welfare mother" scare that caught fire in the 80's and still exists... it is bullshit

    the VAST 99% majority of people collecting disability and ss need it, deserve it, and have earned it.
  • LizardLizard So Cal Posts: 12,091
    Sorry re your dad having cancer. I assume he paid taxes, etc. when he worked, right? then he IS entitled. And he should be -- but the funds for HIM should not be given to those who didn't pay, wouldn't you agree with that? And that is not to say they should not get help. As I said before, there are programs out there to help but for THIS particular program, paid into out of people's paychecks, should not be paid to those who did not.

    That's fair, no?
    So I'll just lie down and wait for the dream
    Where I'm not ugly and you're lookin' at me
  • Am I correct that everyone who has paid into Social Security is entitled to receive it? Since he was brought up here already, would someone like Bill Gates still be eligible for SS once he reaches retirement age?
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • JOEJOEJOEJOEJOEJOE Posts: 10,619
    my2hands wrote:
    this is wrong... and scrapping it is wrong too... i know it has become popular propaganda with some, especially from the right. but thats because they have their facts wrong

    the real issue is the fact that ZERO income over $97,500 gets taxed for social security... thats right folks... you only pay that 6.2 % tax on the first 100k of your income... so that means bill gates is only paying into social security on his first 100k, which means he is apying just about the same as us per year, yet he is worth $50 billion dollars.

    so open all income to the 6.2 % tax and we could do a whole hell of a lot with it. but oh no, the ceo making $20,000,000 this year cant afford to pay that 6% :rolleyes:

    if you take advantage of this country and its economic system and opportunites then you should help give back to the country...

    there is no reason why bill gates only paid about $3,000 more than me in social security taxes last year... that is just bullshit

    I agree, the limit on SS of $97,500 needs fixing, but keep in mind that the CEO earning $20m pays $290,000 in medicare tax, as does his/her employer.

    The odds are, the CEO will never require one penny of medicare benefits, so this does equal the score quite a bit.
  • JOEJOEJOEJOEJOEJOE Posts: 10,619
    A better question would be:
    When are they going to STOP TAXING it?

    WHEN RON PAUL GETS ELECTED!

    :D

    as of now, they only tax it once your total income exceeds a certain amount. Those whose only income is SS benefits are not taxed.

    The taxability of benefits forces the "rich" to "pay back" some of the benefits they receive.
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    Lizard wrote:
    Sorry re your dad having cancer. I assume he paid taxes, etc. when he worked, right? then he IS entitled. And he should be -- but the funds for HIM should not be given to those who didn't pay, wouldn't you agree with that? And that is not to say they should not get help. As I said before, there are programs out there to help but for THIS particular program, paid into out of people's paychecks, should not be paid to those who did not.

    That's fair, no?

    i think the "fraud" issue is a red herring... it is not really a problem. i do not think the system is abused nearly as much as people think it is
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    JOEJOEJOE wrote:
    The odds are, the CEO will never require one penny of medicare benefits, so this does equal the score quite a bit.

    to me it doesnt matter if the individual will ever need it. it is about the 20 million other folks that will need it.

    i pay taxes for my local schools, and i dont have kids. i have no problem paying those taxes, becasue i support my community, my people, and society as a whole. i want good schools for kids to attend, whether they are my kids or not.
Sign In or Register to comment.