The H-Effect

AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
edited September 2006 in A Moving Train
Ok, This guy developed a very unique system. It's mind-blowing.

He spent ten years building a laboratory using tesla coils and other things to concentrate microgravitational energy. Anyway, what he produced was some random effects. When he turns the machine on and it warms up, a series of random things could happen. Though 90% of the time, nothing happens.

The possible events are total breakdown of metallic substances, objects like icecream inside a glass being forced upwards at an endlessly increasing velocity, objects bending and/or shaking, objects dissapearing from existance and reappearing later, and the portal effect (only happened once). His neighbours have also reported their doors opening by themselves and various other strange phenomena. The creator warns the device can start random fires over a very large radius.

The creators name is John Hutchison from Vancouver, B.C. He is an autodidact and is considered a nut by the scientific community. But no one is disputing this strange energy he has tapped into.

Video: http://www.coasttocoastam.com/video/Hutchison-Effect-Music-700k.wmv

Hutchison's Website: http://www.hutchisoneffect.ca/
I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • Interesting to watch, and there are a few videos floating around the net about this guys 'experiments'.

    I cannot pull up a link because my work has a massive web filter and blocks most interesting sites, but these are generally "proven" to be hoaxes. In one video, you can clearly see a wire pulling the item up.

    Interesting none the less, but fake as far as Im conserned.
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    truroute wrote:
    Interesting to watch, and there are a few videos floating around the net about this guys 'experiments'.

    I cannot pull up a link because my work has a massive web filter and blocks most interesting sites, but these are generally "proven" to be hoaxes. In one video, you can clearly see a wire pulling the item up.

    Interesting none the less, but fake as far as Im conserned.

    You think they are all fake? interesting.

    On that note, I wonder how he tied his wire to the icecream.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • Ahnimus wrote:
    You think they are all fake? interesting.

    On that note, I wonder how he tied his wire to the icecream.

    Read about that also, upside down camera. But again, Im not knocking you or him. And I have no proof, only what I've read/ seen/ been pointed to.

    Just my 2 cents on the thread.
  • Yeah that video is cool, but I'm not buying. It looks like some guy in his garage moving junk with strings or magnets. the Ice cream or whatever that liquid was, was pretty cool.
  • Go to his website. Look at some of the pictures. His, "high tech" equipment looks like a bunch of rusted junk. The picture of his balcony, what is that a drum on the railing? wonder how that is used to create the Hutchinson effect?
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    About.com says

    "Hutchison even performed his experiments for scientists from Los Alamos Laboratory. The effect has been videotaped many times and even broadcast on network television."

    http://paranormal.about.com/library/weekly/aa032700a.htm

    As it turns out, the idea was originally made possible by Mel Winfield who developed part of the machine. Another autodidact. He also has videos on his website http://www.nucleonicenergy.com/ he calls the effect Nucleonic Energy. He also provides a lot of theory to support it.

    "Although gravitational acceleration applies to both protons and neutrons in any object, let us examine a proton orbiting within a nucleus in an atom in an object near the Earth's surface. The behavior of a neutron is similar. Since there are waves of energy emanating from all the nucleons contained in the Earth [the average distance of which would coincide at Earth center] the proton would spin naturally with a horizontal axis in the manner of a ping pong ball on a jet of air and would maintain this attitude like a gyro as it orbited within the nucleus. Whether or not the nucleon orbits within the nucleus or just revolves with the nucleus, it still follows an orbital path. The preceding study on nuclear structure brings us to emphasize two important facts. Firstly, its orbital axis and its spin have the same orientation so consequently its orbital plane is vertical relative to the Earth's surface. Secondly, it rotates in the same direction as the atomic vortex. It could not be in any other way for these two arrangements since, in a vortex, the outer layers are orbiting faster than the inner. This would rotate all the particles in the same direction as the vortex as it is shown in Fig. 2.

    Energy waves coming from the Earth strike the proton on the underside and, because of its spin, are forced around it. The result is a difference of pressure between each side of the proton. This phenomenon is known as the Magnus effect from the name of the German Chemist, Heinrich Gustav Magnus who described the effect in 1852. This process is analogous to a baseball, when thrown with a spin, that forces the air to one side causing a lessening of pressure and thus a curving of its path. By replacing the ball with a proton and the air with the moving etheron field, we get the same situation, at a smaller scale, and the proton would be accelerated to the side where there is a greater velocity of the stream carried by the Earth waves. This is depicted in Fig. 2 in contrast to Fig. 1 which would be the case if the proton was not spinning."

    http://www.spacetelescopes.com/gravitation.html

    Let's keep in mind these guys are following up the work of Nikola Tesla, the father of AC current, who was also considered a nut case and a fraud.

    "When he was 81, Tesla stated he had completed a dynamic theory of gravity. He stated that it was "worked out in all details" and that he hoped to soon give it to the world.[2] The theory was never published. At the time of his announcement, it was considered by the scientific establishment to exceed the bounds of reason. Most believe that Tesla never fully developed the Unified Field Theory.

    The bulk of the theory was developed between 1892 and 1894, during the period that he was conducting experiments with high frequency and high potential electromagnetism and patenting devices for their utilization. It was completed, according to Tesla, by the end of the 1930s. Tesla's theory explained gravity using electrodynamics consisting of transverse waves (to a lesser extent) and longitudinal waves (for the majority). Reminiscent of Mach's principle, Tesla stated in 1925 that,

    There is no thing endowed with life - from man, who is enslaving the elements, to the nimblest creature - in all this world that does not sway in its turn. Whenever action is born from force, though it be infinitesimal, the cosmic balance is upset and the universal motion results. "

    Tesla died of heart failure alone in the New Yorker Hotel, some time between the evening of January 5 and the morning of January 8, 1943, at the age of 86. Despite selling his AC electricity patents, Tesla was essentially destitute and died with significant debts. Later that year the US Supreme Court upheld Tesla's patent number 645,576 in effect recognizing him as the inventor of radio.

    Immediately after Tesla's death became known, the Federal Bureau of Investigation instructed the Office of Alien Property to take possession of his papers and property, despite his US citizenship. His safe at the hotel was also opened. At the time of his death, Tesla had been continuing work on the teleforce weapon, or death ray, that he had unsuccessfully marketed to the US War Department. It appears that his proposed death ray was related to his research into ball lightning and plasma and was composed of a particle beam weapon. The US government did not find a prototype of the device in the safe. After the FBI was contacted by the War Department, his papers were declared to be top secret. The so-called "peace ray" constitutes a part of some conspiracy theories as a means of destruction. The personal effects were seized on the advice of presidential advisors, and J. Edgar Hoover declared the case "most secret", because of the nature of Tesla's inventions and patents. [47] One document states that "[he] is reported to have some 80 trunks in different places containing transcripts and plans having to do with his experiments [...]". Charlotte Muzar reported that there were several "missing" papers and property. [48]


    Tesla's family and the Yugoslav embassy struggled with the American authorities to gain these items after his death due to the potential significance of some of his research. Eventually, his nephew, Sava Kosanoviċ, got possession of some of his personal effects which are now housed in the Nikola Tesla Museum in Belgrade, Serbia. [49]
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • It looks pretty fake....
    Believe me, when I was growin up, I thought the worst thing you could turn out to be was normal, So I say freaks in the most complementary way. Here's a song by a fellow freak - E.V
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    Any physicists among us?
    For the quantitative approach to demonstrate the Magnus effect on a proton, we must refer to the Fluids Mechanic field. According to the analysis of ideal fluid flow around a cylinder17, The formula for the lift force at right angles to the free streaming fluid

    where the two stagnation points come together at the bottom of the cylinder, with the two streamlines making an angle of 60 degrees with the tangent to the cylinder, is FL = pBUT. p = density of the undisturbed stream, U = steady flow of uniform velocity of the undisturbed stream, B = length of the cylinder, T = the circulation and equals 4 RU. R = the radius of the cylinder [proton]. The maximum peripheral velocity of the flow is 4U at the top.

    In our case, the cylinder becomes the proton with B being its diameter. The application is valid since it is said17 that it applies not only to the circular cylinder but to a cylinder of any shape including the lifting vane or air foil. Also it has been applied to a baseball which is spherical. There may be a slight difference in the case of a solid sphere since, in that case, there are different angles of deflection of the approaching wave. In the case of a proton, there are smaller particles that make up the vortex of which it is composed. It is structured in the same manner as is the sun. The waves strike these smaller particles head on without deflection, regardless of the curvature of the vortex. They strike them as if they were on a flat surface so therefore the cross sectional area of the sphere is receiving the effects of the force. This is the area of a circle which is used in the next calculations.

    The formula as applied to the proton is F = 4 Pr2U2. Since, in our model, the proton is descending on the left side of its vertical orbit, counter-clockwise, while rotating counter-clockwise [an observer on the opposite side would see the opposite], the Earth wave stream rising vertically strikes the proton and turns into it like a water wave striking the shore an angle and then progressively turning parallel to it. As each minute portion of the wave, in turn, meets the shore, its direction of motion turns at 90o to the shore line which is why the water molecules move a short distance, in this direction, on to the sands. Thus the full dynamic [velocity] force of the wave is transmitted to the proton which, by its rotation, carries it around to its right side. The stagnation point is now at the nine o'clock position with the force difference, known as lift force, being applied horizontally to the right. There is no force pushing back from the right because the wave stream has sufficient momentum so that centrifugal force holds it away from that side. Since the proton is essentially traveling at 45o to the horizontal by moving from the nine o'clock position of the orbit to the six o'clock position, this force of the Magnus effect is divided into the horizontal and vertical directions. Thus the full force drives the proton or neutron.

    The Magnus force accelerates the proton from zero acceleration at the nine o'clock position to its maximum downward acceleration at the six o'clock position of the orbit. The average change in velocity [ V] thus takes place over 1/8 of the circumference of the orbit. The radius of a nucleus is given as 1.2 X 10-13 X [mass no.]1/3 cm. If iron is used as an example, the mass no. is 56 and the radius is then 4.591034839 X 10-13 cm. Since there are 56 nucleons in an iron nucleus that are orbiting, an average radius of orbit will be taken which is the radius from the axis to where all of the mass would be located if it was at a point or on a circumference line. The formula for this radius is [2/5 r2]1/2 = R. R would equal 2.903625382 X 10-13 cm. which is the orbital radius of the average nucleon in the Fe atomic nucleus. The circumference of this radius would be 1.824401634 X 10-12 cm.

    The proton spin angular momentum is given by [3]1/2 X h/4 which is 9.13300574 X 10-28 gm. cm.2/s which = Iw. The neutron spin angular momentum is .684926602 times this which is 6.255438586 X 10-28 gm.cm.2/s. The 26 protons and 30 neutrons added together = 4.251213068 X 10-26 gm.cm.2/s. They are added together because it has been shown herein that the neutron is a proton with a third vortex revolving in the opposite direction around it with an electron between. At least it is opposite relative to the vortexes within it as would a slower orbiting one which would also stop the angular motion of any waves emanating from the inner structure. The proton, making up most of the mass of the neutron, will revolve in the same direction as the bare proton and therefore all angular momentum should be added together with the third vortex of the neutron subtracting [by counter-acting] almost one third of the angular momentum from its proton. This agrees with accepted data.

    Now, the mass of the Fe atom, derived from its atomic weight, 55.847u - 26 electrons X .00055u [which is .0143u] = 55.8327u. Multiplied by 1.66057 X 10-24 gms. per u = a total of 9.271410664 X 10-23 gms. which is the mass of the nucleus. Angular momentum of the atom = mvr so if 4.251213068 X 10-26 is divided by the mass of the nucleus and by R, the average velocity of 1.579161219 X 109 cm./s for the orbit around the nucleus is obtained. The mass of the average nucleon = 9.271410664 X 10-23 gms. / 56 = 1.655609047 X 10-24 gms. The nucleon period in the atom = R X 2 / 1.579161219 X 109 cm./s = 1.155297896 X 10-21 s. The full velocity increase from zero to maximum takes place over 1/4 of the orbit thus the full time is the period divided by 4 which = 2.88824474 X 10-22. To verify that the average velocity [ ] increase is one half of this, F = ma can be used where a = g. The value of will be shown to be 982.9514643 in section II, Cosmology. g = v/t or t = v/g. During the interval of the full time, the Magnus force drives the nucleon downward through a distance of 1/2at2 which equals .5 X 982.9514643 cm./s2 X [2.88824474 X 10-22]2s = 4.099869758 X 10-41cm. = 4.099869758 X 10-41 cm. in 2.88824474 X 10-22 s = 1.419502198 X 10-19 cm./s. t for this average velocity = /g = 1.419502198 X 10-19 cm./s /982.9514643 cm./s2 =1.44412237 X 10-22 s. The average force = 1.655609047 X 10-24 gms. X 1.419502198 X 10-19 cm./s /1.44412237 X 10-22 s = 1.627383337 X 10-21 dynes.

    To compare this with gravitational force, an altered version of Newton's formula shall be used which is [circle G]m/r2 = F. Circle G [ ] will be defined in PART II, Cosmology, and is equal to 3.989644343 X 1020 cm.3/s2. The mass is that of the average iron nucleon which is 1.655609047 X 10-24 gms. and r = the average radius of the Earth, as determined in Part II, of 637090389.9 cm. The result is 1.627383338 X 10-21 dynes. This is an exact correlation. Note: The top and bottom half of the orbit around the atom can be treated separately because they have separate time intervals and are identical in result even though the effect at the top half is the result of deceleration rather than acceleration.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • even flow?even flow? Posts: 8,066
    Nobody has a link to Popular Mechanics debunking this guy? :)
    You've changed your place in this world!
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    even flow? wrote:
    Nobody has a link to Popular Mechanics debunking this guy? :)

    The Popular Mechanics guys are edittors, one of the farthest things from a scientist. I believe what they tell me as much as I believe what Fox News reports.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • I'm calling bullshit based solely on this guy's website.....I mean I couldn't decide if I was at some halloween site, a 14 year old's myspace page, or some shitty porn site. I've seen more professionalism from each of those than I saw at this guy's site.
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    I'm calling bullshit based solely on this guy's website.....I mean I couldn't decide if I was at some halloween site, a 14 year old's myspace page, or some shitty porn site. I've seen more professionalism from each of those than I saw at this guy's site.

    Yea, it is a pretty crappy website.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
Sign In or Register to comment.