Analyze This!

Ahnimus
Ahnimus Posts: 10,560
edited February 2007 in A Moving Train
Turn on the news, read a book and you run into these people that have very strong convictions in drastic contrast to logical thought. Yet they stand by them in the face of total exposure. Their behavior is often reminiscent of some of the members of this board. I am speaking in reference to Ann Coulter and Tucker Carlson's rants about Liberalism and Canada. Or even Limbaugh's attack on Michael J Fox's clinical condition.

Is this not a mental condition? Should this not be considered a serious problem?

Samples
Ann Coulter
http://youtube.com/watch?v=bFQs9sVvujE
http://youtube.com/watch?v=rBJ18FK5ci4
http://youtube.com/watch?v=MkZmfxlSRDU

Rush Limbaugh on Michael J Fox
http://youtube.com/watch?v=uEah7_lzsOU

I really don't understand why these people are so popular. Is it just entertainment? Is television exploiting their sickness?
I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
Post edited by Unknown User on
«134

Comments

  • angelica
    angelica Posts: 6,038
    Ahnimus wrote:
    Turn on the news, read a book and you run into these people that have very strong convictions in drastic contrast to logical thought. Yet they stand by them in the face of total exposure. Their behavior is often reminiscent of some of the members of this board. I am speaking in reference to Ann Coulter and Tucker Carlson's rants about Liberalism and Canada. Or even Limbaugh's attack on Michael J Fox's clinical condition.

    Is this not a mental condition? Should this not be considered a serious problem?

    Samples
    Ann Coulter
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=bFQs9sVvujE
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=rBJ18FK5ci4
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=MkZmfxlSRDU

    Rush Limbaugh on Michael J Fox
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=uEah7_lzsOU

    I really don't understand why these people are so popular. Is it just entertainment? Is television exploiting their sickness?

    I have to admit, as a Canadian, I thought the "dog-sledding" bit was funny! Just imagining that anyone seriously thinks that we Canadians generally dog-sled still has me laughing! I'll get to the other clips in a bit.
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • Holy shit...lol...What idiots...Can't believe I haven't seen those clips until tonight... Ann Coulter? What the?.. I'm a conservative but way way different from this chick...I think she needs to get a good fuck or something..then get left behind in the dirt...
    Yeah the dog sled part was funny too...then we take coffee breaks in our igloos...LOL

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=84EjWeTMBZs
    Master of Zen
  • Holy shit...lol...What idiots...Can't believe I haven't seen those clips until tonight... Ann Coulter? What the?.. I'm a conservative but way way different from this chick...I think she needs to get a good fuck or something..then get left behind in the dirt...
    Yeah the dog sled part was funny too...then we take coffee breaks in our igloos...LOL

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=84EjWeTMBZs

    She needs food. A nice piece of cheesecake or a banana split with all the toppings. :D
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • angelica
    angelica Posts: 6,038
    Ahnimus wrote:
    Is this not a mental condition? Should this not be considered a serious problem?...

    Is television exploiting their sickness?
    Could you please elaborate on how you see these behaviours as "sickness"?
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • Ahnimus
    Ahnimus Posts: 10,560
    angelica wrote:
    Could you please elaborate on how you see these behaviours as "sickness"?

    Well, let's see, they are stuck on a path, won't listen to anyone else, they don't even have anything supporting their opinion, even their own parties disown them. I mean there ideas are just so fucking wack that they must either be insane or on drugs. I think their behavior is quite evident.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • She needs food. A nice piece of cheesecake or a banana split with all the toppings. :D

    and extra extra cream of course...lol
    Master of Zen
  • angelica
    angelica Posts: 6,038
    Ahnimus wrote:
    Well, let's see, they are stuck on a path, won't listen to anyone else, they don't even have anything supporting their opinion, even their own parties disown them. I mean there ideas are just so fucking wack that they must either be insane or on drugs. I think their behavior is quite evident.
    Oh their behaviour is evident, however interpretion of that behaviour is a different thing.
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • Ahnimus
    Ahnimus Posts: 10,560
    Honestly, I couldn't even have sex with Coulter, she just turns me right off. She may be attractive, but she's just annoying and sickening.

    That Laura Schwartz woman is a different story. I'd do her. lol
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • Ahnimus
    Ahnimus Posts: 10,560
    angelica wrote:
    Oh their behaviour is evident, however interpretion of that behaviour is a different thing.

    How do you interpret it?

    "Godless: The Church of Liberalism"

    That's so fucking ignorant and hateful towards atheists. If I could force myself to fuck Coulter, I'd do so and leave her in the dirt, that's the best solution I've heard yet.

    Here is a woman that literally wants democrats dead.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • angelica
    angelica Posts: 6,038
    Ahnimus wrote:
    How do you interpret it?

    "Godless: The Church of Liberalism"

    That's so fucking ignorant and hateful towards atheists. If I could force myself to fuck Coulter, I'd do so and leave her in the dirt, that's the best solution I've heard yet.

    Here is a woman that literally wants democrats dead.
    If we're going to pathologize people because we don't like them or don't agree with them or simply because they are obnoxious or sensationalistic, that would be a very dangerous way to go, in my opinion. You also said: "Their behavior is often reminiscent of some of the members of this board". The idea of confusing real sickness with behaviour that bothers us would do nothing but a serious disservice to real illness.

    If you so dislike hate and sensationalism in others, why would you give yourself permission to say: "If I could force myself to fuck Coulter, I'd do so and leave her in the dirt, that's the best solution I've heard yet".
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • Ahnimus
    Ahnimus Posts: 10,560
    angelica wrote:
    If we're going to pathologize people because we don't like them or don't agree with them or simply because they are obnoxious or sensationalistic, that would be a very dangerous way to go, in my opinion. You also said: "Their behavior is often reminiscent of some of the members of this board". The idea of confusing real sickness with behaviour that bothers us would do nothing but a serious disservice to real illness.

    I think this is the misinterpretation with illness. We are all ill, what we identify as "illness" is just extreme cases of the human condition. Coulter definitely fits into that category.
    If you so dislike hate and sensationalism in others, why would you give yourself permission to say: "If I could force myself to fuck Coulter, I'd do so and leave her in the dirt, that's the best solution I've heard yet".

    Because of the psychological implications of doing so. I wouldn't do it out of animosity, I'd do it for the psychological effects. If there was an alternative short of lobotomization, I'd advocate it.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • angelica
    angelica Posts: 6,038
    Ahnimus wrote:
    I think this is the misinterpretation with illness. We are all ill, what we identify as "illness" is just extreme cases of the human condition. Coulter definitely fits into that category.
    We are all flawed and imperfect. You said yourself, you see similar behaviours on this board. Again, we can convince ourselves someone is ill just because we don't like their view, but it doesn't make it true. Illness, particularly psychological illness is much more complicated than being fringe behaviour or views. It has to do with function vs. non-functioning.

    Because of the psychological implications of doing so. I wouldn't do it out of animosity, I'd do it for the psychological effects. If there was an alternative short of lobotomization, I'd advocate it.
    You don't seem to realize that your own hostility and hatred rival the hatred in what you hate.
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • Ahnimus
    Ahnimus Posts: 10,560
    angelica wrote:
    We are all flawed and imperfect. You said yourself, you see similar behaviours on this board. Again, we can convince ourselves someone is ill just because we don't like their view, but it doesn't make it true. Illness, particularly psychological illness is much more complicated than being fringe behaviour or views. It has to do with function vs. non-functioning.

    I'm not saying she is ill because her opinions are different than mine. I'm saying she is ill because she is blatantly wrong and when told so she ignores it or acknowledges it, then promptly forgets. She reminds me of my ex who had OCD.
    You don't seem to realize that your own hostility and hatred rival the hatred in what you hate.

    Are you Ann's sister?
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • angelica
    angelica Posts: 6,038
    Ahnimus wrote:
    I'm not saying she is ill because her opinions are different than mine. I'm saying she is ill because she is blatantly wrong and when told so she ignores it or acknowledges it, then promptly forgets. She reminds me of my ex who had OCD.
    First of all, I'm guessing you are in the top few percentile of intelligence. It's then par from the course that you will see a ton of things the average person does not. That makes you exceptional, not the average person sick. The average person doesn't make sense a lot and goes from self-illusion to self-illusion! And not that "smart" people are much better--it's just that "smart" people will tend to see more of these zany patterns while still repeating them, themselves.
    Are you Ann's sister?
    Are you going to address the point? It seemed as though you are calling these people sick for their ugliness. And then you go on to talk about how you'd like to do something ugly. That looks like a contradiction or hypocrisy to me. I'd love it if you could clear that up so I can understand.
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • Ahnimus
    Ahnimus Posts: 10,560
    angelica wrote:
    First of all, I'm guessing you are in the top few percentile of intelligence. It's then par from the course that you will see a ton of things the average person does not. That makes you exceptional, not the average person sick. The average person doesn't make sense a lot and goes from self-illusion to self-illusion! And not that "smart" people are much better--it's just that "smart" people will tend to see more of these zany patterns while still repeating them, themselves.

    Are you going to address the point? It seemed as though you are calling these people sick for their ugliness. And then you go on to talk about how you'd like to do something ugly. That looks like a contradiction or hypocrisy to me. I'd love it if you could clear that up so I can understand.

    Chances are you aren't going to understand. Judging by how this conversation has unfolded this far, we aren't going to agree. We don't normally anyway. Anyhoo, Ann Coulter is mentally ill.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • sponger
    sponger Posts: 3,159
    Ahnimus wrote:
    I'm saying she is ill because she is blatantly wrong and when told so she ignores it or acknowledges it, then promptly forgets. She reminds me of my ex who had OCD.

    Are you Ann's sister?

    She reminds me of you.
  • sponger
    sponger Posts: 3,159
    angelica wrote:
    First of all, I'm guessing you are in the top few percentile of intelligence.

    Some people on this board actually think that about Ahnimus. It's really one of the strangest occurrences I have ever seen take place on the internet.
  • angelica
    angelica Posts: 6,038
    Ahnimus wrote:
    Chances are you aren't going to understand. Judging by how this conversation has unfolded this far, we aren't going to agree. We don't normally anyway. Anyhoo, Ann Coulter is mentally ill.
    What. You're only willing to discuss this with those with whom the conversation will "unfold" in a way that you'd like it to? aka, those who agree with you?

    It's interesting to note that I'm a fairly left-leaning person, too. There is a reason lay-persons are unequipped to diagnose illness or mental health issues.
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • Ahnimus
    Ahnimus Posts: 10,560
    sponger wrote:
    She reminds me of you.

    I've never advocated the death of anyone. And I certainly don't consider Godless to be a bad thing.

    If you ever had a face to face conversation with me, you'd so how not excited I actually get about politics and shit. I wouldn't have a chance to talk up on one of these shows man, they'd trample me with their yelling and rambling.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • Ahnimus
    Ahnimus Posts: 10,560
    angelica wrote:
    What. You're only willing to discuss this with those with whom the conversation will "unfold" in a way that you'd like it to? aka, those who agree with you?

    It's interesting to note that I'm a fairly left-leaning person, too. There is a reason lay-persons are unequipped to diagnose illness or mental health issues.

    Don't give me this layperson shit. I bet I know more about the brain and mind than you do. Your theories are as bad as Coulter's.

    And, no, I'd just prefer to converse with someone where the conversation actually unfolds, not this wheel spinning crap. We can't make any compromises because you think there is a big line between mental health and illness and I think that line is very grey.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire