Conservapedia

2»

Comments

  • barakabaraka Posts: 1,268
    Alex_Coe wrote:
    Look, you wack job: I do not have the time to spell "Donut" with eight letters. It is just not possible. My time is valuable, this "doughnut" foolishness has got to stop. It's wasting valuable man-hours.

    uh, my post was in jest.........hope yours was too.
    The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance,
    but the illusion of knowledge.
    ~Daniel Boorstin

    Only a life lived for others is worth living.
    ~Albert Einstein
  • Alex_CoeAlex_Coe Posts: 762
    It was.
  • Trau wrote:
    Don't act like liberals never make the same kinds of charges.

    I'm not. I recognize that both sides do it and I get this upset at both sides of the coin. The list you linked to is ridiculous, I agree. It just seems so fucking crazy to me that people would think that Wikipedia is so outwardly biased, and then put forth a conservapedia. I find it humorous as well as outrageous and frightening.
    "She knows there is no success like failure
    And that failure's no success at all."

    "Don't ya think its sometimes wise not to grow up."

    "Cause life ain't nothing but a good groove
    A good mixed tape to put you in the right mood."
  • Purple HawkPurple Hawk Posts: 1,300
    Trau wrote:
    Look at this list of absurdity.

    http://www.conservapedia.com/Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia

    I agree with the bitch about using C.E. and B.C.E. instead of A.D. and B.C., but those are accepted terms in their field.

    are you really that stupid? seriously. i don't mean to be rude, but can anyone see that this is a colbert typed project, made by a lib to poke fun at conservatives? again, anyone who actually thinks this is made by a conservative in a serious manner, you REALLY need to get a sense of humor.
    And you ask me what I want this year
    And I try to make this kind and clear
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
    Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
    And desire and love and empty things
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    I'm not. I recognize that both sides do it and I get this upset at both sides of the coin. The list you linked to is ridiculous, I agree. It just seems so fucking crazy to me that people would think that Wikipedia is so outwardly biased, and then put forth a conservapedia. I find it humorous as well as outrageous and frightening.

    i too find it amusing. i will choose to steer clear of conservapedia just as i do with wikipedia. :)
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • Purple HawkPurple Hawk Posts: 1,300
    cutback wrote:
    That's disgusting and offensive.

    your seriousness is disgusting and offensive.
    And you ask me what I want this year
    And I try to make this kind and clear
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
    Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
    And desire and love and empty things
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
  • Bwalker545Bwalker545 Posts: 162
    nvm...why cant I delete...
    "Almost unconsciously he traced with his finger in the dust on the table: 2+2=5" 1984
  • ScubascottScubascott Posts: 815
    I can't find 'Darwin' in conservapedia.
    It doesn't matter if you're male, female, or confused; black, white, brown, red, green, yellow; gay, lesbian; redneck cop, stoned; ugly; military style, doggy style; fat, rich or poor; vegetarian or cannibal; bum, hippie, virgin; famous or drunk-you're either an asshole or you're not!

    -C Addison
  • ScubascottScubascott Posts: 815
    Scubascott wrote:
    I can't find 'Darwin' in conservapedia.

    Wait, I found him. The article discusses his religious beliefs.

    I then found the article on evolution. It gives a very short one paragraph outline explaining what the theory is and then proceeds to attack it based on lack of transitional forms in the fossil record. Their arguments are very, very lame, and the article makes no mention of the evidence for evolution by natural selection. I'm tempted to see if I can create an account and edit the article, but I don't have that much time to waste.
    It doesn't matter if you're male, female, or confused; black, white, brown, red, green, yellow; gay, lesbian; redneck cop, stoned; ugly; military style, doggy style; fat, rich or poor; vegetarian or cannibal; bum, hippie, virgin; famous or drunk-you're either an asshole or you're not!

    -C Addison
  • ScubascottScubascott Posts: 815
    are you really that stupid? seriously. i don't mean to be rude, but can anyone see that this is a colbert typed project, made by a lib to poke fun at conservatives? again, anyone who actually thinks this is made by a conservative in a serious manner, you REALLY need to get a sense of humor.

    I don't know. I've got a pretty dry, sarcastic sense of humour, and I looked at the site. After reading a few articles I think its actually for real. If not somebody has way, way too much time on their hands. . . .
    It doesn't matter if you're male, female, or confused; black, white, brown, red, green, yellow; gay, lesbian; redneck cop, stoned; ugly; military style, doggy style; fat, rich or poor; vegetarian or cannibal; bum, hippie, virgin; famous or drunk-you're either an asshole or you're not!

    -C Addison
  • HinnyHinny Posts: 1,610
    Scubascott wrote:
    I don't know. I've got a pretty dry, sarcastic sense of humour, and I looked at the site. After reading a few articles I think its actually for real. If not somebody has way, way too much time on their hands. . . .
    I think it started out as a joke- the privacy and disclaimer sections being left blank being the biggest clues. Then it must've been seen by some thick people as a legit site, and they went about putting their own entries in.
    Binary solo..000000100000111100001110
Sign In or Register to comment.